allurisivajiraju
05 October 2009 at 08:02
Respected Seniors,
Suit for Pronote. Plaintiff residing at Kaikaluru and suit promissory note was executed at Kaikaluru. Defendant residing at Tadepalli Gudem. While executing suit promissory note residence of the plaintiff was mentioned clearly as Kaikaluru and subsequently suit was filed at PJCJC of Kaikaluru. Defendant not taken any specific defence with regarding to the jurisdiction in his written statement.
Suit was posted for marking of documents and cross of PW-1. On that day Court has taken an objection that there is no specific column in the suit promissory note for place of execution of Pronote. In fact there is no specific column for place of execution of pronote except address of the plaintiff.
In the above circumstances the Plaintiff counsel taken an adjournment to submit hearing to the Court with regarding to the jurisdiction.
Now my question is, is it applicable the principle of ‘DEBTOR SEEKS CREDITOR’.
Is there any solutions to the plaintiff.
Thanking you in advance.
monika
04 October 2009 at 23:50
if a person had applied for VRS and the sanction has been accorded by the authorities but the dues have not been setteled and it is more than one and a half years now any case law related to this please help
monika
04 October 2009 at 23:44
can a lawyer be the head of an NGO/private owned legal institution/trust as sole trustee
ROHAN SONI
04 October 2009 at 23:10
SIR I WANT TO PRACTICE AS A LAWYER IN INTELLECTUAL PROPPERTY RIGHTS AND MY QUALIFICATION IS LLB DO I REQ ANY OTHER COURCE AND ALSO SUDDEST THE REPUTATED LAW FIRM TO JOIN.REGARDS ROHAN
Adinath@Avinash Patil
04 October 2009 at 22:38
MAXIM-
MAXIM " VIGILANTIBUS NON DORMIENTBUS JURA SUBVENIENT"-
MEANING AND SCOPE-
LAW ASSISTS THOSE WHO ARE VIGILANT AND NOT THOSE WHO SLEEP OVER THEIR RIGHTS-BUT EVEN A VIGILANT LITIGANT IS PRONE TO COMMIT MISTAKES-APHORISM "TO ERR IS HUMAN"
BEING MORE A PRACTICAL NOTION OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR THAN AN ABSTRACT PHYLOSOPHY, UNINTENTIONA LAPS ON THE PART OF A LITIGANT SHOULD NOT NORMALLY CAUSE THE DOORS OF THE JUDICATURE PERMANENTLY CLOSED BEFORE HIM-
EFFORT OF THE COURT SHOULD NOT BE ONE OF FINDING MEANS TO PULL DOWN THE SHUTTERS OF ADJUDICATORY JURISDICTION BRFORE A PARTY WHO SEEKS JUSTICE, ON ACCOUNT OF ANY MISTAKE COMMITED BY HIM, BUT TO SEE WHETHER IT IS POSSIBLE TO ENTERTAIN MIS GRIEVANCE IF IT IS GENUINE.
Adinath@Avinash Patil
04 October 2009 at 22:12
DUTY OF A LAWYER
HE HAS A DUTY IN DISCHRGING
HIS PROFESSIONAL ASSIGNMENT,
HAS A DUTY TI HIS CLIENT,
A DUTY TO HIS OPPONENT,
A DUTY TO THE COURT,
A DUTY TO THE SOCIETY AT LARGE
AND A DUTY TO HISELF.
EVERY LAWYER SHOLD KNOW THIS.
Sachin Bhatia
04 October 2009 at 21:49
Want to know the price of following Law Books?
1) R.C.R. (Civil)
2) R.C.R. (Criminal)
3) C.C.J.
4) Black's Law Dictionary
5) L.J.R.
6) C.C.C. (Consumer)
7) A.I.R.
Ranganath
04 October 2009 at 20:29
Ld counsels,
Chargesheet has been filed alleging offenses u/s 420 and 417. Cognizance taken and summons issued. Accused filed discharge. In this case there is already a complaint alleging dowry demand but no FIR was registered based on this.
1. Process is issued based on second complaint. Is the court right in taking cognizance of the chargesheet arising out of second complaint without considering the final report of the first complaint. Though it is mentioned in teh second complaint that there is a previous complaint prior to this one. magistrate issued process with out reading the FIR.
2. Will discharge be dismissed citing that there are allegations of dowry demand and there is a possibility of framing charges though prima facie offenses u/s 420,417 is not established.
3. Will discharge be possible when the complainant is found to be lying on the face of the record which amounts to fraud on court.
Please clarify
Thanks
jagadhathri
04 October 2009 at 19:45
in a civil case if a suit is dismissed for default it can be restored by filing restore petition... like that in a criminal case if a complaint was dismissed whether it can be restored...
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
VACATION OF SHOPS
SIR, MY FRIEND AND I TOOK TWO SHOPS ON RENT FROM SAME/ SINGLE OWNER ABOUT 35 YRS BACK. NOW HE HAS SENT US A COURT NOTICE TO VACATE THESE SHOPS. AS HE IS A CENTRAL GOVT. EMPLOYEE AND GOING TO TAKE RETIREMENT AND WANTED TO DO SOME BUSINESS IN THESE SHOPS. HE HAS OTHER PROPERTY AND AGRICULTURAL LAND ALSO.
(1) CAN HE GET VACATED THESE SHOPS FROM US ON THE BASIS OF RETIREMENT AS HE HAS OTHER SHOPS AND PROPERTY ALSO ?
(2) IS THERE ANY REMEDY TO FIGHT AGAINST HIM ?