LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ghansham das   25 September 2009 at 21:43

NI Act-138 , 141-142,,,

Dear Sir,
Can it pls be reply-

A deemed registred Ltd, company collects the a deposit/advances, remained attahced with its principal company which is public-listed one in BSE/NSE/etc: ok.
Now after taking money, appointing agancy workings,start harrasnments, diladalla, & issues payments for admitted liability, which is made to stop -dishonestly,?
[ 138 case filed, in 32/35 days,]

Also fails to refunds the dues,claims, etc, but
sells out its shares,rights,etc to third party.

What are the steps under which such section- rule- acts etc are in existance, to curbed and controll & making awareness to Public too,can be adopted.
which are different courts are to be approached, compalint to be sent, where, how, with along with Police stn if so, pls guide.
thanks
janaki raman

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   25 September 2009 at 21:33

Language of suit at the time of filing....

Seniors

Please solve my query quickly.

today in one case under sec.138 of N.I. act the advocate of accused demanded to translate the whole suit in vernancular language i.e. in GUJARATI, in JMFC.

We r generally doing court proceeding in english.

Is there any article/ section/ or latest judgement that make compulsion to do so?

Pl source me judgements in favour and against us.

It is very urgent for us.


judge also urged us to do so if we fail to prove that there is no such provision that bind us to translate the suit in Varnencular...

ashish misra   25 September 2009 at 21:00

138 nia act

i have some business transaction with a company. these transaction run around five year . in 2005 company unwritten demand some security cheque .i have give around 15 cheque blank cheque only company name is mentions. And my signature amount
column is blank .
23th of july 2009 I closed that account due to some problem . immediately I inform company person . due to some dispute our business is closed .
Company present some cheque on 22.9.2009 due to account closed the cheque is dishonored . they send me legal notice 19.11.2009 . i file a criminal case against you.

Dear sir
1. i have evidence that cheque is issued in 2005
2. I inform the company that account is closed

ashish misra   25 September 2009 at 20:59

138 nia act

i have some business transaction with a company. these transaction run around five year . in 2005 company unwritten demand some security cheque .i have give around 15 cheque blank cheque only company name is mentions. And my signature amount
column is blank .
23th of july 2009 I closed that account due to some problem . immediately I inform company person . due to some dispute our business is closed .
Company present some cheque on 22.9.2009 due to account closed the cheque is dishonored . they send me legal notice 19.11.2009 . i file a criminal case against you.

Dear sir
1. i have evidence that cheque is issued in 2005
2. I inform the company that account is closed

sankar.n   25 September 2009 at 19:39

FACTORIES ACT CITATION REQUESTED

P. PARASURAMAN,
N. SANKAR,
ADVOCATES,
VELLORE -9.

DEAR FRIENDS,

PLEASE LET ME CLARIFY WHETHER THE SPECIAL OFFICER (IMPLIED BY NAME) OF A CO.OP SUGAR MILL IS LIABLE FOR THE DEATH OF A WORKER OF THE SUGAR MILL WHILE HE WAS HIT BY THE REVERSING CONTRACT CANE LORRY IN THE UNLOADING SITE OF THE SUGAR MILL CAMPUS UNDER FACTORY ACT ON THE PRETEXT OF NEGLIGENCE AND LACK OF SUPERVISION, APART FROM THE PROSECUTION OF THE LORRY DRIVER UNDER 304 (A) IPC, COMPENSATION BY THE MILL AND COMPENSATION UNDER MCOP. AT THE TIME OF ACCIDENT, THE SPECIAL OFFICER WAS HOLDING ADDITIONAL CHARGE ONLY. FURTHER THE DIRECT SUPERVISING OFFICER (FACTORY MANAGER) HAS ALSO BEEN PROSECUTED UNDER THE FACTORIES ACT. WHEN THE FACTORY MANAGER WHO WAS DIRECTLY SUPERVISING HAS BEEN IMPLICATED IS IT NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE THE SPECIAL OFFICER WHO WAS HOLDING ADDITIONAL CHARGE THAT TOO BY HIS NAME INSTEAD OF DESIGNATION. APPROPRIATE CITATIONS MAY KINDLY BE GIVEN.

Himanshu   25 September 2009 at 18:49

Stamp Duty on Lease Deed

Please advice, if I want to execute Lease Deed in U.P. for 3 years, the Lease Rent will be Rs.100000/- and Security Deposit amount will be Rs.300000/- what amount of stamp duty will be payable on Lease Deed for commercial property. Please also advice the percentage of stamp duty to be payable.

Parul Jain   25 September 2009 at 17:41

Coaching instiute for Judicial service preparation

Respected all ,

I need information on coaching institute specializing in training for Judicial examination like DJS, RJS ( Rajasthan Judical services) in Laxmi Nagar , Delhi or nearby area.

Regards
Parul

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   25 September 2009 at 17:27

cognigence of act

when a magistrate order u/sec 156(3) he received report u/sec 173(1) & taking cognigence u/sec 190(1)(a)
Expect it u/sec.202 gets report u/sec.173(2) & taking cognigence u/sec.190(1)(b)
is it all right. pls varify these statement

Anandakumar   25 September 2009 at 17:18

13(4) SARFAESI PAPER PUBLICATION

After taking possession under 13(4) SARFAESI, is it mandatory to publish the same in news paper. If it is mandatory, What is the available recourse for the bank if it is not published?

P.C. Joshi   25 September 2009 at 16:44

Professional advise

Friends,
Can personal advises be asked on this forum. If yes, how.

Regards
P.C. Joshi