paramjeetsingh
03 September 2009 at 20:46
R/sir,
i m paramjeet singh working as chef with a restaurant. i want to start my own mobile food van.i want to do the query about licenses for that.
Regards
paramjeet
subramaniam
03 September 2009 at 20:17
If a student got master degree through open university with out any basic qualifiction and there after complete Law degree from regonised law college, he is eligible for enrollment as a advocate is possible or not ?
sachin arora
03 September 2009 at 20:13
Sir/Madam,
We purchased a land two years back.The plot was too big and the owner sold it in four parts. when we went to purchase the land, the first part was sold. the owner told us that the first part had a length of 24.9 foot.We took the second part os the plot with the front of 42 foot. Subsequently all the parts were sold by the owner and the registration was done for all of them on one day as the land actually belonged to a person of punjab and this owner had given only the token to them.
Immediately after the registration, we made the boundary of the land with correct measurements. After two years, now when we planned for making our house, the third party told us that their front was 32 foot in the registration paper but it was actually coming 30 foot in measurement. They checked our registry and then measured our plot which was coming right. Then they measured their adjacent plot i.e. fourth part which actually belonged to the owner who had sold the plot to all of us.He was making his own house and he had captured one foot of the third party. On the other hand , the third party also measured the first part which was coming 24.9 and the measurement in the registry was 23.9.It was due to the carelessness of the owner that one foot extra went to the first party. We were at no mistake, still the third party is trying to claim one foot land from us. Kindly tell that what are the legal actions that the third party can take on us though we are not responsible for whatever has been done??
AJIT KAWATKAR
03 September 2009 at 20:09
kindly anybody give me maharashtra ownership flat [amendmend]rules 2009.Thank you.
Ashvin Khambhata
03 September 2009 at 20:01
My friend is running one enginreenig industries having employed 110 employees .Out of said srentgh,14 are holding managinarl position.My friend want to close down this unit due to financial lose but he has started one small unit in Maharasrta & he willmanufacture one item of present unit. whather is it obligation to club this two units under i.d.act.Is in necessary to obtain prior permission from appropiate Government? pl give some judgments
Ranganath
03 September 2009 at 19:37
Ld Counsels,
The ban imposed on using police statements as evidence is confined to the particular criminal trail and does not restrict its applicablity as evidence in other civil or criminal proceedings.
This is the law laid down by SC in its judgement in "Khatri and others etc. v. State of Bihar and others "Can any one give me the full judgment of this case.
(2)The ban imposed by Section 162 against the user of a statement recorded
by Police during investigation is a limited one, and is confined to an inquiry
or trial in respect of an offence then under investigation. Such a statement can
be used in collateral proceedings, e.g. in civil or writ proceedings subject to
relevancy.
Also pls clarify if the polcie statement can be used to initiate process u/s 340 CrPc for perjury.
thanks
NAMRATA DONTUL
03 September 2009 at 19:14
In case of 498A can a FIR be filed without medical examination of victim/complainant. If without medical examination of victim FIR is filed and chargesheet is presented then what provisions are available to accused.
NAMRATA DONTUL
03 September 2009 at 19:08
If arrest is done in early morning at 5 a.m. in 498A case then can it is a violation of fundamental rights
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
MV ACT
please suggest some citation regarding the release of vehicle by court which was seized under Section 207 M.V Act. My client is ostensible owner who purchased the vehicle only on stamp paper but not transferred in his name yet. The driver has confessed and case has been disposed. Court has denied to release the vehicle because he is not registered owner. vehicle can not be transferred unless it is released.