Dwij
19 June 2008 at 22:21
Hi,
I filled form 1A with the company name as initials of names of the members of my family. it was suffixed with private limited.
The authorised capital I showed was Rs 100,000.
The objectives of the company were:
Primary objectives of DPHM Private Limited is to do leveraged short term and long term investing in Indian Stock Exchanges like NSE and BSE.
My form was rejected with the following reasons:
"abbreviated names is not considered for new co, and less authorised capital for investment SRN should be resubmitted by 17/07/2008.This is the last time this SRN can be resubmitted. Thereafter further resubmissions of this SRN shall not be allowed."
Please suggest me what I am doing wrong here. Thanks.
Dwij
Vinay Ranjan
19 June 2008 at 18:50
Dear sir/ma'm
I have a small practical problem regarding filing of application in court in arbitration matter,which i am stating herein.
there was a dispute arose between two party for which arbitration was provided.Even after giving application for the formation of tribunal by the applicant to respondent the respondent didn't took any action.After that the applicant moved to court for getting an interim order for staying any disposal of property by the respondent. This order was granted by the court till the date the tribunal is constituted. Now the tribunal is constituted but one of the three member of the tribunal got retired.
So,again the applicant filed an application in the same court citing the earlier application and claimed for the interim order.no fresh application was filed. So, my query is whether that court after giving the interim order at the first time still has the jurisdiction to deal with the matter?is this application maintainable?
Rama Verma
19 June 2008 at 17:48
there is future agreement between a & b FOR 1997 TO 2001 in which A PAYS IN ADVANCE FOR OIL TO BE PROVIDED UPTO 2001.BUT B FAILS TO PROVIDE OR STOP TO PROVIDE.WHAT ARE LIABLITIES AGAINST B.
neelam desai
19 June 2008 at 17:11
what is the difference between registered mortgage and equitbale mortgage
Ranjit Asati
19 June 2008 at 16:02
Dear Sir,
I am going to start a joint venture with a land developer.In this joint venture we will buy land and develope it,build duplaxes and sale it.I have to invest some money(50%) in the venture.Please advise me,which document should I prepare with him for future security of money and to minimize the risk of fraud?
Ashok Tiwari
19 June 2008 at 14:22
Friends,
i am puttinga quary on this site, please provide proper solution.
One Mr. A, married to Mrs. B, and out of bedlock of A & B born mr. C, who is a minor. Now A & B separeted from each other (Devorced) and the Minor Son mr. C is staying (custody)with his father A. Now his Father Mr. A working with a international Firm in Saudi Arabia, and His Son Mr. C is stying with his grandmother at Mumbai.
Now Mr. A desires to appoint his sister D to be the gaurdian of minor Mr. C.
How Mr. A can appoint his sister to be the gaurdian of his son in his absence or during his visit at abroad.
without approching proper court.
Legal_Query
19 June 2008 at 14:08
Sir,
pls suggest website or journal which specifically deals with mining and mining related issues in India, like case laws, judgments, notifications, proceedural laws etc.
rgds
shweta
19 June 2008 at 13:08
A, a Hindu dies leaving 4 people. In his will he mentions that 100 Rs each would be paid to the 4 people he left behind i.e 400 Rs.
But after selling his property on A's death only Rs 300 is realised.
Now in what proportion would the property be divided and which Sections of which Act would apply.
puja
19 June 2008 at 12:30
When can son asks for the partition of property? wht if father has self acquired property only? what is the status of married daughter in that case?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Provincial Insolvancy Act
Hi friends! in a pending creditor Insolvancy petition the Respondent / Debtor sold his another property which was not shown in the schedule of the pending petition, without taking any consideration only with a view to defrauding the creditors. The said sale transaction is within the limitation to set a side the sale transaction i.e.90 days. The petitioner / Creditor neither filed another creditor I.P. nor filed a petitioner for add the recently sold property schedule by amending the pending petition. Please advice. What type of remedy the Petitioner / Creditor have for set aside the sale deed which was executed recentsly by the Respondent/Debtor.