Vianney
15 July 2016 at 17:22
1) What is the effect of absence of Registration number, Name of Government Appointing the Notary - on the seal of the Notary.
2)Serial Number as required by Form XV of Notarial Register pertaining to the document notarised not mentioned on the document.
Laxman Singh
15 July 2016 at 17:13
WE A NEED BRAVE COMPLETE CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT WHO MAINTAIN THEIR THINKING POWER ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION TO FILE A PETITION IN SC REGARDING OUR SUBJECT.
OUR CONSTITUTION HAS DEGENERATED BECAUSE MALPRACTICE HAS DESTROYED CHECKS AND BALANCE IN THE SYSTEM, IT IS POSSIBLE TO REFORM THE CONSTITUTION TO RESTORE IT’S ORIGINAL INTENT BUT NO PARTY IS ATTEMPTING THAT.
SO WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO FILE PETITION IN SC REGARDING THE SUBJECT "CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTION."
CAN I APPEAR AND PROSECUTE IN SC AS A CITIZEN PLZ GUIDE ME
IF ANY EXPERT WANT MORE DETAIL REGARDING THE SUBJECT PLZ SEND UR REPLY
rajan chopra
15 July 2016 at 17:10
Sir the cheque issued by the drawer in favour of me to clear his liability has been bounced for want of funds.Now I want to file a criminal complaint u/s 420 IPC and can I file the same in the Court or before that I have to sent notice to drawer of the cheque as per law ?
pushpakrishna
15 July 2016 at 17:06
Dear experts
Can an accused person get station bail from sho as per the section 41(a)cr.pc in a case u/s 3(1)x ofPOA sc st act.OR
Can an accused person can file quash petition in the high court for the above as the complinant used to filing the same to extract the money from various persons.
Kindly give suitable advice on the above.
Thanq experts in advance.
Arjun Mehra
15 July 2016 at 16:35
Dear All,
I was senior professional working with private company before i was terminated from my permanent services by giving in lieu 3 month of notice pay. Reason for termination is not provided in termination letter only clause reference was given under which termination was executed. I was terminated by applying clause B.
As per appointment letter there are 2 clauses with reference to exit i.e Clause A & Clause B.
Under Clause A employment can be terminated by the company, without any notice or payment of any kind of lieu of notice in the following reasons like furnishing incorrect information, suppression of material information, dishonesty, disobedience, insubordination, incivility, intemperance, irregularity, misconduct on duty, adjudged insolvent, cheat, Fraud etc.
Whereas Under Clause B subject to the right of the company to terminate this employment in accordance with clause A, it may be terminated either by the company or yourself by giving 3 month notice to each other.
I was terminated using clause B and my settlement was done with payment of 3 month of notice, leave encashment, PF and gratuity etc. but I am not issued any relieving letter which is issued to all other employees.
Below I am quoting the exact wording used in the letter issued to me. There is no header given to letter such as termination letter or something.
"In Accordance with clause B of your appointment letter, the company has decided to terminate your services with immediate effect by payment to you in lieu of stipulated 3 months' notice. However, you may receive your dues, if any, from our accounts department on any working day during the working hours after completing due formalities."
Generally, Clause A is used whenever any termination letter is issued by specifying the exact reason for taking action against the employee with reference to their termination of service whereas in my case no reason was provided except the use of clause mentioned in the letter.
My F&F mention DOJ, DOR & LWD and I am paid all the benefits which is offered to any other employee and nothing was witheld except the relieving letter.
I need to know does my company has the right not to issue me relieving letter post issuing the above letter since I am terminated under clause B. I has requested them to issue me the letter but same is gone in vain. Also suggest possible action i can initiate to get the relieving letter.
Sincerely,
Arjun Mehra
anandakumar
15 July 2016 at 16:34
respected experts.my friend purchased an ancestral property from total of 8 legalheirs in the year 2006.out of the 8 legal heirs 3 were minors in 2006 and their natural guardians signed the sale deed.3 recurring bank deposits created in the names of minors and their respective shares were deposited in their names.necessary recitals were also made in the sale deed that for the welfare of the 3 minors their share amounts of the sale of the property were deposited in the banks and only the minors on attaining majority can utilise and withdraw the deposited amounts from the bank.likewise the minors after they became majors withdrawn the amounts in the years 2007,2008, and 2010.now,my friend wanted to sell the property but the purchasing party complains that his lawyer gave an opinion that the property was not sold by the order of permission from the court bcoz the property also stood in the name of minors but it was sold without their knowledge or consent.further the purchaser told to get consent letters from the 3 persons who were minors in 2006 .my friend searched for them but their whereabouts are not known.secondly,if they are found as major adults they may ask huge amounts for giving consent letters or demand anything else.how to solve this problem and sell the property.plz advise.
Neeraj Jha
15 July 2016 at 16:02
Dear Experts,
I had changed my name and address, and published in 3 local newspapers.
after 6 months at my parental house, summons came from court mentioned my old name then my parents denied and told that the name of the person does not live here. and he wrote down that and went back.
Please assist me is there any legal action against me by court in any manner.
Thanks in advance.
pavan kumar
15 July 2016 at 16:00
According to 173(8)crpc through this defacto complainant can file a petition to protest the complaint thanks
Dinesh Pratap singh
15 July 2016 at 14:23
an employee is there on election duty dealing with top priority isuue of Law and Order. on the same day/polling day some misshappening occurs which causes loss to the Government. Now the Departmental officers not taking consideration of election duty and no weightage is given to this fact. However the District Magistrate who was also a District Election Officer categorically stated that the employye was on election duty and was not aware of the new development of his working area and could not take the required action .
is there any law or election rule by which employees are safeguarded against this kind of double duty or liability.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Stamp duty on RECTIFICATION DEED
as name of the caste of buyer in registration deed is wrong .Kindly tell me how much stamp duty is required in rectification deed to make it correct .if this is the case of Ranchi jharkhand.