LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

CAT disputed order against my appeal

(Querist) 22 February 2011 This query is : Open 
sir,i appeared in deptt exam.fail by jsut 2 marks.got answersheet under rti.found many mistake
in evaluation.my few correct answers were made wrong .in 2 questions 5 facility name was
askd .write down 5 name
there r 10 to 15 facility available.in model answer key there were only 5 answers.if i write
down other than these answers my answers was made wrong.even what i ahve wrtitten accepted
by cpio of my deptt.hence applied through proper channel but no response.then i approach
CAT.CAt direct to consider the representation.Deptt pass speaking
order that we have no revaluation rule hence can not revaluate but increased 1 marks as this
answer was in model key.But my argument was that my
answer is correct and i am not asking for revalution of whole
answer script.provided 1 marks but in case of others correct answers they said as per model
answer there is no change in other answers.again move to CAT.
I prayed following point in CAT

1. My answers was correct but no marks provided.
2.i have attached solid evidences like RTI acceptence,Trg center document even pritn out of wesite where these facility(my answer) was availabele.
3.Mistake was commited by evalutor because there were only 5 samples .but there r 10 -15 correct answers.Model answer r provided for help but in my case evaluator was based on only model asnwer key.even i attached relevent document with my represenation but examiner said that as per model answer key u r answers r wrong.
4. Further it is said as there is no revaluation rule hence can not revaluate u r rest answers.
5even my answersheet was was send to same examiner but it should be send to other examiner

but CAT dismissed my appeal.CAT stated that
1. As there is no revaluation rule and you have not challanged the rule.
2. Examiner may used same method of evaluation for other candidates also.hence direction of
revalution in u r case will be unjustice to others candidates.
3.1 marks increased does not mean u have wright to revalute.
4.applicant have no right to say that as answersheet was send to same examiner it should be
send to another examiner

now i want to move HC.
what should be main focus in my writ.what is probabilty to win.pls guide for future strategy.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :