Salary slip
Sathyanarayana A R
(Querist) 29 May 2017
This query is : Resolved
Is issue of salary slip to employees mandatory under any/many statutory law/s? If so please enlighten me. If salary is paid but salary slip is not issued, what is the legal implication? Please let me know.
Guest
(Expert) 29 May 2017
No statute has made that mandatory so far. It is for the transparency and simplification of administrative processes and also to avoid disputes and doubts, as far as possible, in the minds of both the employer and employees.
However, cashless transactions, if made mandatory, will compel the employer to issue salary slips to each employee.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Employee can demand form 16 from the employer.
Guest
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Employee can't demand Form 16, if no TDS has been recovered.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
THE CONTRACT LABOUR (REGULATION AND ABOLITION) CENTRAL RULES, 19711
78. Muster Roll, Wages Registers, Deduction Register and Overtime Register.—1 [(l) (a) Every contractor shall in respect of each work on which he engages contract labour,— (i) maintain a Muster Roll and a Register of Wages in Form XVI and Form XVII respectively:
(c) Every contractor shall obtain the signature or thumb impression of the worker concerned against the entries relating to him on the Register of Wages or Muster Roll-cum-Wages Register, as the case may be, and the entries shall be authenticated by the initials of the contractor or his authorised representative and shall also be duly certified by the authorised representative of the principal employer in the manner provided in rule 73.
(d) In respect of establishments which are governed by the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (4 of 1936) and the rules made thereunder, or Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (11 of 1948) or the rules made thereunder, the following registers and records required to be maintained by a contractor as employer under those Acts and the rules made thereunder shall be deemed to be register and records to be maintained by the contractor under these rules, namely:—
(a) Muster Roll; (b) Register of Wages; (c) Register of Deductions; (d) Register of Overtime; (e) Register of Fines; (f) Register of Advances;
(g) Wage slip;
https://hrylabour.gov.in/staticdocs/labourActpdfdocs/Contract_Labour_Central_Rules.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
26. Form of registers and records.
(2) A wage slip in Form XI shall be issued by every employer to every person employed by him at least a day prior to the disbursement of wages.
(3) Every employer shall get the signature or thumb-impression of every person employed on the 1 {register of wages} and wage slip. (4) Entries in the 1 {register of wages} and wages slips shall be a authenticated by the employer or any person authorized by him in this behalf.
4 {26A. Preservation of registers A register required to be maintained under rules 21(4), 25(2) and 26(1) and 5 {the muster roll required to be maintained under rule 26(5)} shall be preserved for a period of three years after the date of last entry made therein.}
http://labour.nic.in/sites/default/files/TheMinimumWages_Central_Rules1950_0.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948
18. Maintenance of registers and records.- (1) Every employer shall maintain such registers and records giving such particulars of employees employed by him, the work performed by them,
the wages paid to them, the receipts given by them
and such other particulars and in such form as may be prescribed.
(3) The appropriate Government may, by rules made under this Act, provide for the issue of wage books or wage slips to employees employed in any scheduled employment in respect of which minimum rates of wages have been fixed and prescribe the manner in which entries shall be made and authenticated in such
wage books or wage slips by the employer
or his agent.
http://www.labour.nic.in/sites/default/files/TheMinimumWagesAct1948_0.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Payment of Wages Act;13A,
4 [13A. Maintenance of registers and records.— (1) Every employer shall maintain such registers and records giving such particulars of persons employed by him, the work performed by them, the wages paid to them, the deductions made from their wages,
the receipts given by them
and such other particulars and in such form as may be prescribed.
(2) Every register and record required to be maintained under this section shall, for the purposes of this Act, be preserved for a period of three years after the date of the last entry made therein.]
http://labour.nic.in/sites/default/files/ThePaymentofWagesAct1936.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
6. Payment of wages.-
Wages shall be paid direct to the individual workman on any working day between the hours 6.00 A.M. and 6.00 P.M; at the office of the Mine. The manager or any other responsible person authorized by him shall witness and attest the payments and note the date of payment in the wage register. Payment of wages to a contractor's workman shall be made at a place to be specified by the manager and it shall be witnessed by a nominee of the employer deputed for this purpose in writing.
http://www.delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_labour/Labour/Home/Acts+Implemented/Details+of+the+Acts+Implemented/The+Industrial+Employment++Act%2C+1946/The+Industrial+Employment+%28Standing+Orders%29+Central+Rules%2C+1946
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Under Standing Orders:
19. PAYMENT OF WAGES / SALARY:
Wage Slip shall be made available to all the employees providing detailed description of the wages received, money deducted on a/c of absentee, holiday, damages, EPF & ESIC etc.
http://www.mnr-india.com/images/careers/worker_standing_order.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT ,1976
Form D Register
THE EQUAL REMUNERATION RULES, 1976
FORM D [See Rule 6]
http://www.labour.nic.in/sites/default/files/equal_remuneration_rules_1976_0.pdf
http://www.labour.nic.in/sites/default/files/equal_remuneration_act_1976_0.pdf
http://www.labour.nic.in/womenlabour/equal-remuneration-acts-and-rules-1976
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Min.Wages Rules in the State
e.g;
The Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963
Sec 18 r/w Rule 27, Rule 28 and Rule 30 & Form II Maintenance of muster roll cum wage registers,
attendance cum wage slip,
records, inspection books etc
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
20 REGISTER OF LEAVE WITH WAGES FOR THE YEAR See Rule 120 FORM No. 14
Note : Separate Page will be allotted to each worker.
http://labour.kar.nic.in/fandb/f_feecharts.htm
http://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annexure/Annexure-B.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Pursue Various registers/slips under
Shops & Establishment Act of the state
Shops & Establishment Rules of the state
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
Shri Rajendra K Goyal is from Legal Cells of Banking background and can update you with insights.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
GO thru carefully the guidance issued by central Govt, State Govt of
Republic of India
by publications on its websites and offices.............
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 29 May 2017
http://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annexure/Annexure-B.pdf
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Dear Sathyanarayana,
The imposter, Mr./Ms Kumar Doab, with his fake identity, has provided you his google searched more than ample TRY & DIE TYPE OF MATERIAL through his 13 vague posts to make you find solution to your problem by yourself
OR you can start giving "(a) Muster Roll; (b) Register of Wages; (c) Register of Deductions; (d) Register of Overtime; (e) Register of Fines; (f) Register of Advances" as maintained for some wage workers in lieu of salary slips to your employees.
OR else,, as per his advice, you can treat your employees as wage workers and start issuing wage slips instead of salary slips without showing detailed elements of CTC and nature of deductions.
His other intention seems to be, as if you must treat your employees as factory workers of MNR Exports Pvt. Ltd., and must also make applicable the manual of the said private ltd company, titled as, "MNR EXPORTS PVT. LTD COMPANY’S LABOUR STANDARDS & EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANUAL" on the employees of your organization by scrapping of your own organization's employees manual.
Not only that he has further suggested that at your own you should make search of lakhs, rather millions of documents through hundreds of websites of the Central or States Governments, you can find rules or regulations on Salary slips to employees and then "go thru carefully the guidance issued by central Govt, State Govt of Republic of India by publications on its websites and offices............."
Not only that, He has provided YOU a link, "http://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annexure/Annexure-B.pdf" intended to maintain a very long list of various registers and other records, EXCEPT "SALARY SLIP", AS IF HE CONSIDERED YOU AS THE MOST RAW HAND AND A NOVICE EMPLOYEE OF YOUR ORGANIZATION AND ALSO AS IF YOU HAVE ASKED FOR THE VARIOUS KINDS OF REGISTERS/RECORDS TO BE MAINTAINED BY A COMPANY, BUT NOT SALARY SLIP.
Anyway, best of luck, he has provided you a job of months' together, if not for years at the cost of your own job, if you fail in your mission by adhering to his/her advice!
However, you may or may not lose your job by adhering to his/her advice, but the imposter, Kumar Doab, has been able to satisfy his/her mind and soul by making 13 posts as a remedy to his/her lust and chronic disease of making multiple posts on each and every thread, irrespective of whether he knows anything about the subject matter or not.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 30 May 2017
In this thread also I wish for the 1st time IT=@PSD....................eternal peace and sleep.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 30 May 2017
IT=@PSD is this very old, very sick entity in 2nd last posts in this thread...............that has posted IT's=@PSD's constipated views and fully wrong opinion in this thread as usual.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Even the 1st post of IT=@PSD in this thread also is copied and pasted from same tribal source of badlands of Pakistan from which IT=@PSD posted erroneous, misleading posts.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Employer should provide form 16 as liability for I T return has to be determined after including this income and other income (rent, interest etc.).
Sometime employee has worked with more than one employer during the year and TDS from each employer may not be deducted as payment from was below
taxable income.
Please visit link given below:
http://www.livemint.com/Money/5v0jwSCNNPZMF7pBo4oAqM/An-employer-can-be-penalized-for-not-issuing-Form-16-by-due.html
Every employee has the right to obtain the TDS certificate, i.e., the Form 16, from her employer. And according to section 203 of the I-T Act, if tax was deducted on the employee’s income, the employer has to furnish Form 16. If there was no TDS on the income, then the employer can decline to issue the form of that employee.
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Agree with Mr.RK Goyal
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Follow the Advise Please
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Follow the Guidance
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Well Advised
Guest
(Expert) 30 May 2017
Nothing to Add More
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
IT=@PSD,
Shri Rajendra K Goyal has posted his comments on Form16.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
Poser, Imposter IT=@PSD
Your condition has been truly and truthfully diagnosed as ;
Worsened in last 17-18 months
at LCI.
You are at liberty to rant, today also in your private fiefdom, in front of your own mirror as many times as you want............
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
At the plateform of LCI IT=@PSD has advertised that adding title Mr/Mrs/shri/Shrimati (equivalent of Zenab/Mohtarma) to one's name makes one tout ( Dalaal/Dalla/Bhadwa)................
IT=@PSD has not advertised which original research on IT's=@PSD's tribal genes, customs proves it.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
The frantic, frustrated posts of IT=@PSD are advertisement of purposeless and meaningless life lived at LCI also.
Of course these are record some points and show IT's=@PSD's photo.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
Young lawyer NJSR has posted his concurrence to the advice's in the thread.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
Good to see expression of agreement with expert
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
Good to see expression of agreement with advice of expert
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
Good to see expression of well advised by expert
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
It remained to be added that poster, Impostor..........
IT=@PSD
has posted in threads his purposeless, meaningless,sidetracking,worthless posts that have reference of standing orders from tribal badlands of Pakistan.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
All links posted above are issued by good orders by governance and government of Republic of India............
Government of Republic of India can post,keep its orders on any website.
IT=@PSD was, is, and shall never be
NOone
Anything
to question.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
IT=@PSD
shamelessly advertise some firms at good plateform of LCI.
Per applicable rules/laws of Republic of India 'Salary Slip' has to be issued by firms.
Any violator can be penalized,punished........................
Be it anyone
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
The gross ignorance, of ill informed IT=@PSD is exposed in this thread also.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 June 2017
IT=@PSD advertises as some Chief Lawyer
IT=@PSD is not a Lawyer.
IT=@PSD advertises some firms as some law firms..................that are not law firms.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 June 2017
Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana,
Your query has been addressed in detail.
You can benefit from the details provided to you without any cost to you.
You may thank LCI and Experts at LCI that share and illustrate.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 June 2017
Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana,
The Republic of India is not some Tribal badlands of Pakistan that does not care of Statue or Statutory provisions.....
In Republic of India the employer can be personally held responsible for violations of Standing Orders.
Usually employer keep someone in HR/Personnel/Admin/Legal cells to offer their neck...............
The designated officials should neither violate themselves or on asking by employer.............
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 June 2017
IT=@PSD and the firms that IT shamelessly advertises at LCI are being blacklisted by community of employees, employers...........for grossly wrong and ill informed conduct, approach, language, being habitual offender and abuser.........and having insatiable itch to provoke, instigate, and be Dangai.......
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 June 2017
Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana,
Watch your profile carefully.............IT=@PSD litters IT's=@PSD's trademark TAMASHAA ( IT's=@PSD's own favorite word) nuisance, abuse at profiles of authors/querists, members, experts, in addition to threads...............
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
It seems by your exposure you have become quite restless, impulsive, irritated, frustrated and aggressive that you cannot resist making absolutely vague and senseless posts in multiple just for the solace of your mind and as of a remedy to your chronic disease of making multiple posts without any object.
Anyway, you are welcome again with your restless, impulsive, irritated, frustrated mind.
But, it seems you are fond of being exposed more and more about your follies as well as deceptive, evasive and wrongly directed posts without any advice to the author of the problem.
So, I am responding to all of your posts individually from next post onward.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
You have already been exposed about your wrong advice about "(a) Muster Roll; (b) Register of Wages; (c) Register of Deductions; (d) Register of Overtime; (e) Register of Fines; (f) Register of Advances; (g) Wage slip;, as well as a very long list of HR records as per Central Acts", as against the question merely on salary slip, where you have not so far refuted my observation so far even through any of your 17 vague, evasive and abusive posts.
However, I would like to congratulate you if you could get even the slightest of solace to set at peace your frantically restless and frustrated soul & mind or could have found any remedy to your chronic disease of making multiple useless posts!
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice by reproduction of the section is quite wrong, as, "26. Form of registers and records. ...... (2) A wage slip in Form XI shall be issued by every employer to every person employed by him at least a day prior to the disbursement of wages" CANNOT BE A SUBSTITUTE TO A SALARY SLIP OR A STATUTORY PROVISION FOR THAT TERM.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice by reproduction of the section is quite wrong, as, "6. Payment of wages.- Wages shall be paid direct to the individual workman on any working day between the hours 6.00 A.M. and 6.00 P.M" CANNOT BE A SUBSTITUTE TO A SALARY SLIP OR A STATUTORY PROVISION FOR THAT TERM, AS NOTHING IS INDICATED THEREIN ABOUT SALARY SLIP.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice by reproduction of the section is quite wrong, as, "6. Payment of wages.- Wages shall be paid direct to the individual workman on any working day between the hours 6.00 A.M. and 6.00 P.M" CANNOT BE A SUBSTITUTE TO A SALARY SLIP OR A STATUTORY PROVISION FOR THAT TERM, AS NOTHING IS INDICATED THEREIN ABOUT SALARY SLIP.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you reproduced Clause 19 of the MNR EXPORTS PVT. LTD COMPANY’S LABOUR STANDARDS & EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MANUAL about "PAYMENT OF WAGES / SALARY" as the provision of the private company's Manual cannot be applied universally, more particularly when the problem does not relate to your assumed company, "MNR EXPORTS PVT. LTD" of CALCUTTA, or that he is also working at Calcutta.
The author of the problem has nowhere mentioned that the problem related to MNR EXPORTS PVT. LTD.
Question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you reproduced section "13A. Maintenance of registers and records."
The author of the problem has not at all sought any solution on the maintenance of registers and records in his company.
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you quoted, "EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT ,1976" and "Form D Register" of "THE EQUAL REMUNERATION RULES, 1976.
The author of the problem has not at all sought any solution on the "EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT ,1976" or "Form D Register" to be maintained for his company.
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you quoted, "THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948" and its section "18. Maintenance of registers and records." AND Sun-section "(3) The appropriate Government may, by rules made under this Act."
The author of the problem has not neither asked for any solution on "THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948" NOR is competent to make rules under this Act.
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you quoted,"Min.Wages Rules" of the State of Maharashtra, i.e., "The Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963."
YOU SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST THE BAREST MINIMUM COMMONSENSE THAT Maharashtra State's "The Maharashtra Minimum Wages Rules, 1963" cannot be applied in the cases of Karnataka State, as the author of the problem belongs to Bangalore (Karnataka.
FURTHER, when you have quoted, "Sec 18 r/w Rule 27, Rule 28 and Rule 30 & Form II Maintenance of muster roll cum wage registers, attendance cum wage slip," that is also quite wrong, as the author has not sought solution to any problem relating to muster roll, wages registers or attendance cum wage slips for any worker or "records, inspection books etc."
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you quoted, Form No. 14, pertaining to "REGISTER OF LEAVE WITH WAGES FOR THE YEAR" of the Factories Rules, as the author of the problem has not at all sought format of "REGISTER OF LEAVE WITH WAGES FOR THE YEAR."
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely wrong when you quoted, Form No. 14, pertaining to "REGISTER OF LEAVE WITH WAGES FOR THE YEAR" of the Factories Rules, as the author of the problem has not at all sought format of "REGISTER OF LEAVE WITH WAGES FOR THE YEAR."
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely irrelevant and wrong when you have asked him to "Pursue Various registers/slips under Shops & Establishment Act of the state Shops & Establishment Rules of the state," when you have not quoted relevant rule pertaining to the problem of "Salary Slip" of the author.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely irrelevant, wrong and uncalled for when you have advised that "Shri Rajendra K Goyal is from Legal Cells of Banking background and can update you with insights." You should have known that the author of the problem has nowhere stated that he belonged to the banking industry or asked for salary slips prescribed for bank employees.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely irrelevant, wrong and uncalled for when you have advised him to "GO thru carefully the guidance issued by central Govt, State Govt of Republic of India by publications on its websites and offices," WHEN NOT SPECIFIED THE PUBLICATION, WHILE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND STATE GOVERNMENT HAVE LAKHS OF PUBLICATIONS/ DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO SERVICE MATTERS.
Is not your advice a clearcut "TRY & DIE" FORMULA FOR THE AUTHOR, you advised, BUT WITH NO SOLUTION of his problem?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice is absolutely irrelevant, wrong and uncalled for when you have expected him to open and refer the link of a list of 86 documents, "http://labour.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annexure/Annexure-B.pdf"
You could have stated, what for what purpose he should refer that list of 86 documents, when there is no reference to any statutory law pertaining to salary slip problem of the author.
Those registers and records cannot be a substitute to the salary slip of the author.
THAT CLEARLY DENOTES LACK OF COMMONSENSE IN YOU AND A LUST FOR MAKING MULTIPLES OF VAGUE AND MISLEADING POSTS JUST TO MISGUIDE THE QUERISTS AND ALSO TO CREATE FAKE IMPRESSION ABOUT YOU TO BE AN EXPERT TO MISTAKE AS ILLUSTRATED ADVICE ON YOUR PART, WHILE YOU ALWAYS TRIED TO BEFOOL ONE AND ALL AT THIS FORUM.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
BUT WHEN I EXPOSED YOU IN MERELY ONE POST ABOUT YOUR WRONG AND MISLEADING ADVICE, INSTEAD OF CLARIFYING YOUR POSITION, YOU WISHED FOR MY DEATH BY SAYING, "In this thread also I wish for the 1st time IT=@PSD....................eternal peace and sleep."
MIND IT, YOU WOULD NEVER BE TREATED AS AN EXPERT EVEN AFTER MY DEATH.
AN IMPOSTER AND A FAKE EXPERT WOULD REMAIN EVER AS AN IMPOSTER AND A FAKE EXPERT.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Not only that even after wishing for my death, you could not get your extremely frustrated soul appeased and thereafter made at least 17 additional posts just as a remedy to your chronic disease of making multiples of vague and meaningless posts.
But, in spite of that, I can assure you that you won't be able to get mental peace.
Also your that action cannot establish you as an expert, as A FAKE EXPERT AND AN IMPOSTER WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN AN IMPOSTER ONLY.
Anyway, rest assured, I shall give observation on all of your insensible posts, which you make due to your unsound mind. The same process is going to continue below this post also
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your abusive post, "@@PSD is this very old, very sick entity in 2nd last posts in this thread...............that has posted IT's=@PSD's constipated views and fully wrong opinion in this thread as usual," DO YOU AGREE THAT YOUR EXPOSURE THROUGH MY POST HAS BECOME A CAUSE OF CONSTIPATION IN YOUR BODY?
So from this post even, nobody can expect that you can make any sensible post, what to say of any sensible advice to any author of the problem!
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your post, "Even the 1st post of IT=@PSD in this thread also is copied and pasted from same tribal source of badlands of Pakistan from which IT=@PSD posted erroneous, misleading posts" MAKES IT VERY CLEAR THAT YOU HAVE A VERY CLOSE LINK WITH PAKISTAN, WHEN YOU REFER TO THE BADLANDS OF PAKISTAN, AS THAT CAN ONLY BE KNOWN TO A REAL PAKISTANI, NOT ANY INDIAN WHO HAS NEVER VISITED PAKISTAN IN HIS LIFE.
SO, MY APPREHENSION PROVES TRUE THAT YOU CAN ONLY BE A SPY OF PAKISTAN AND WOULD HAVE BELONGED TO SOME SUCH BADLANDS OF PAKISTAN, BUT NOT AN INDIAN CITIZEN, AS IN SPITE OF HUNDREDS OF REQUESTS, YOU HAVE REFUSED TO REVEAL YOUR TRUE IDENTITY, NAME PHOTO AND LOCATION.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your post"@PSD,Shri Rajendra K Goyal has posted his comments on Form16," THAT ALSO REVEALS LACK OF COMMONSENSE IN YOU AND ALSO THAT YOU DON'T KNOW EVEN ABC OF SERVICE LAWS.
CAN YOU CLARIFY, IN WHAT WAY FORM-16, AS ISSUED ANNUALLY ONLY WITH GROSS AMOUNT OF ANNUAL SALARY AND THE TDS RECOVERED, HAS ANY CONCERN WITH THE SALARY SLIP, WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE ISSUED ON OR BEFORE THE DISBURSEMENT OF SALARY EVERY MONTH?
If Mr. Rajendra K Goyal has rendered wrong advice, that does not mean that I should blindly endorse that like you.
A pertinent question arises, when you are unable to understand the sense of the problem and also does not know ABC of law, why do you unduly poke your nose everywhere?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your post, "@PSD ... Your condition has been truly and truthfully diagnosed as ;
Worsened in last 17-18 months at LCI," HOW A PERSON, LIKE YOU, WHO HAS REALLY GONE BERSERK AND MAKES ONLY SENSELESS POSTS, MAD CAN BE EXPECTED TO DIAGNOSE ANY ONE ELSE, WHEN ALL MY ABOVE POSTS CLEARLY PROVIDE AN OPEN DIAGNOSE OF YOUR MENTAL CONDITION TO BE OBSERVED BY ONE AND ALL AT THE LCI?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your post, "At the plateform of LCI IT=@PSD has advertised that adding title Mr/Mrs/shri/Shrimati (equivalent of Zenab/Mohtarma) to one's name makes one tout ( Dalaal/Dalla/Bhadwa)..............." when you don't reveal your reasl identity, how anyone can know that you are a gent or a lady? Also, when you have shown symbols of sycophancy towards Mr. Sudhir Kumar and a few others, that only can sense your being a tout of some experts at LCI.
Further, about your vague post, @PSD has not advertised which original research on IT's=@PSD's tribal genes, customs proves it," that does not prove any tribal genes in me, rather your own exposure proves that you have none other than tribal genes in you." You just make insensible posts, but I have been proving practically that every that thing fits very well on you that you said.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
I have already stated, " You just make insensible posts, but I have been proving practically that every that thing fits very well on you that you said."
Your post aimed at me, "The frantic, frustrated posts of IT=@PSD are advertisement of purposeless and meaningless life lived at LCI also," is also like that, which befits your berserked personality.
THE EXAMPLE IS VERY MUCH THERE AT THIS VERY THREAD, as I exposed you only with my single post, but in response you made 20 posts full of your frantic frustration. NOT ONLY THAT MY SINGLE POST REVEALED ONLY ABOUT YOUR WRONG, EVASIVE AND MISLEADING ADVICE WITH PROOF, BUT IN STEAD OF PROVING ME WRONG, YOU COULD SHOW ONLY YOUR FRANTICALLY FRUSTRATED IMAGE OF YOUR UNSOUND MIND BY MAKING 20 WORTHLESS AND MEANINGLESS POSTS.
THAT CLEARLY GIVES IMPRESSION TO ONE ALL THAT YOU HAVE GONE PROFUSELY BERSERK.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your vague self certification, "Young lawyer NJSR has posted his concurrence to the advice's in the thread," DON'T TRY TO TAKE UNDUE CREDIT ON YOU. Mr. NJSR HAS NOWHERE MADE ANY CONCURRENCE ON YOUR WRONG, MISLEADING & TRY & DIE TYPE OF ADVICE.
Can you point out, if anywhere in any of his posts Mr. NJSR would have stated to be agreed with you. HE SIMPLY STATED, "Agree with Mr.RK Goyal." NOWHERE COMES THE NAME OF IMPOSTER KUMAR DOAB.
Moreover, even if he would have agreed with you that would not have mean that your unmindful wrong, evasive and misleading advice could become a correct advice for the author of the problem,
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
OF WHAT CREDIT TO YOU, WHEN YOU SAY "Good to see expression of agreement with expert," but nobody agreed with you?
However, that way you clearly admit that you are not an expert, as whosoever agreed with anyone, he agreed with expert, not you? Apparently, if not agreed with you, you can never be an expert.
HOWEVER, IT CAN NEVER BE A GOOD FOR YOU.
IT IS ONLY JUST LIKE THE SAYING, "Begaani shaadi mein Abdulla diwaana."
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
OF WHAT CREDIT TO YOU, WHEN YOU REPEATED "Good to see expression of agreement with advice of expert," but nobody agreed with you?
However, that way you AGAIN clearly admit that you are not an expert, as whosoever agreed with anyone, he agreed with expert, not you? Apparently, if not agreed with you, you can never be an expert.
HOWEVER, IT CAN NEVER BE A GOOD FOR YOU.
IT IS ONLY JUST LIKE THE SAYING, "Begaani shaadi mein Abdulla diwaana."
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
OF WHAT CREDIT TO YOU, WHEN YOU REPEATED "Good to see expression of agreement with advice of expert," but nobody agreed with you?
However, that way you AGAIN THIRD TIME admit that you are not an expert, as whosoever agreed with anyone, he agreed with expert, not you? Apparently, if not agreed with you, you can never be an expert.
HOWEVER, IT CAN NEVER BE A GOOD FOR YOU.
IT IS ONLY JUST LIKE THE SAYING, "Begaani shaadi mein Abdulla diwaana."
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
OF WHAT CREDIT TO YOU, WHEN YOU AGAIN REPEATED "Good to see expression of well advised by expert," when nobody stated that you would have advised well with your wrong and misleading advice?
However, that way you AGAIN FOURTH TIME admit that you are not an expert, as whosoever agreed with anyone, he agreed with expert, not you? Apparently, if not agreed with you, you can never be an expert.
HOWEVER, IT CAN NEVER BE A GOOD FOR YOU.
IT IS ONLY JUST LIKE THE SAYING, "Begaani shaadi mein Abdulla diwaana."
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
When you say, "@PSD ... has posted in threads his purposeless, meaningless, sidetracking, worthless posts that have reference of standing orders from tribal badlands of Pakistan," YOU HAVE ONLY ATTACKED ON YOURSELF, NOT ME, AS I HAVE ABUNDANTLY PROVED YOUR ADVICE TO BE QUITE purposeless, meaningless, sidetracking, worthless posts that have reference of standing orders IN THIS VERY THREAD. I HAVE NEVER REFERRED STANDING ORDER OF ANY COMPANY, WHILE YOU TIME AN AGAIN REFER THAT OF THE MNS EXPORTS PVT LTD.
Everything you said, I have proved against you. I have already said, you just allege without any basis, but I practically prove against you.
FURTHER, YOU SEEM TO BE HOME SICK, AS YOU HAVE AGAIN MADE A MENTION OF YOUR "tribal badlands of Pakistan." ARE YOU REALLY A SPY OF PAKISTAN, PLEASE CONFIRM?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your advice stating, "All links posted above are issued by good orders by governance and government of Republic of India............" does not justify your advice to be correct, if you refer to only irrelevant hundreds and thousands of such documents/ links, which fails to provide even a remote solution to the nature of problem.
FURTHER, your statement, "PSD was, is, and shall never be NOone ... Anything to question" is quite wrong, as you will have to admit that I have exposed you exorbitantly when you have rendered quite a wrong and misleading advice to the querist.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your statement, "@PSD shamelessly advertise some firms at good plateform of LCI. ... Per applicable rules/laws of Republic of India 'Salary Slip' has to be issued by firms. ... Any violator can be penalized, punished.............. Be it anyone," WHY DELAY, TAKE THIS CHALLENGE ALSO, SUE ME IN THE COURT OF LAW AND GET ME PENALISED, IF YOU HAVE ANY PROOF WITH YOU.
I have already posed several challenges on you, but you have never done anything so far. ANY REASON FOR NOT TAKING ANY OF MY CHALLENGES SO FAR?
You may post your reason here itself in response to this post, so that readers should also know what are your compulsions that you only prefer to allege, but find yourself unable to prove.
HOWEVER, ONE THING IS CERTAIN THAT YOU SHAMEFULLY MAKE ANY FAKE ALLEGATION, BUT DON'T PROVE THAT.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your statement, "The gross ignorance, of ill informed IT=@PSD is exposed in this thread also," is a gross contradiction of what is being proved and what has already been proved in several threads against you.
Had I been even slightly ignorance (what to say of gross ignorant, I would not have been able to expose you on account of your grossly misleading and wrong pieces of advice to several querists. MIND IT ONLY A KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSON CAN BRING TO FORTH WHAT IS WRONG AND WHAT IS RIGHT, NOT AN IMPOSTER, LIKE YOU.
Even in this very thread, on every count you made mention in each and every post in this thread, you have been proved grossly wrong.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
About your statement, "@PSD advertises as some Chief Lawyer ... =@PSD is not a Lawyer. ... @PSD advertises some firms as some law firms..................that are not law firms," YOU MAY BETTER STATE ABOUT YOURSELF, WHETHER YOU ARE A LAWYER?
About myself, you should bvetter remember, I have already posed several challenges on you to drag me in a court of law and prove whatever you believe to be true. After that you may post the judgment at the LCI for the information of the all the members. Why don't you do that.
OTHERWISE, GIVE ME YOUR FULL PARTICULARS, INCLUDING YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO, ADDRESS, etc, TO HELP YOU TO PROVE YOUR BELIEF. WHY DELAY?
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
As you addressed the author, "Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana," and stated wrongly that his "query has been addressed in detail" and he "can benefit from the details provided," YOU CANNOT CLAIM HIS QUERY TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN DETAIL BY YOUR TOTALLY MISLEADING, WRONG AND EVASIVE ADVICE, WHICH CAN ONLY PROVE AS A "try 7 die" EFFORTS BY HIM, IF HE MAKES MISTAKE TO FOLLOW YOUR ADVICE, AS HE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO FIND EVEN THE SLIGHTEST OF THE CLUE TO SOLVE HIS VERY SIMPLE PROBLEM OUT OF YOUR SUGGESTED REGISTERS, RECORDS, FORMS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR YEARS TOGETHER.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
As you addressed the author, "Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana, ... The Republic of India is not some Tribal badlands of Pakistan that does not care of Statue or Statutory provisions.....<' YOU NEED NOT REMIND HIM ABOUT YOUR OWN PAKISTANI BADLANDS. HE MAY BE KNOWING MUCH BETTER THAN YOU ABOUT INDIA.
THE QUESTION ARISES how do you know that the statutes or statutory provisions are not cared for by the inhabitants of Pakistani badlands. THAT ITSELF PROVES THAT YOU HAVE VERY CLOSE CONNECTIONS WITH PAKISTAN.
FURTHER< if "in Republic of India the employer can be personally held responsible for violations of Standing Orders" of MNX EXPORTERS< which you referred, you could better have guided him how he could hold responsible his own employer on account of salary slip, which he never stated was not being by his employer. HE JUST WANTED TO KNOW THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF NOT ISSUING A SALARY SLIP, WHICH YOU HAVE NOT SPECIFIED IN ANY OF YOUR 33 VAGUE MISLEADING & EVASIVE POSTS.
Moreover, how do you know that he is an employee, not an employer, having asked for legal implications?
STILL FURTHER IN THAT VERY POST, YOU HAVE STATED, "Usually employer keep someone in HR/Personnel/Admin/Legal cells to offer their neck..............., WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE FOR MAKING SUCH A VAGUE POST, WHEN YOU DON'T KNOW THE BACKGROUND OF THE CASE OR HIS ORGANIZATION? By the way, with this statement, how the querist can find answer to his query?
That clearly proves that you make only vague and meaningless posts just to confuse the authors of the problem.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Your own statement is DENOTES YOUR SHAMELESS ACT, WHEN YOU MADE SUCH A NASTY STATEMENT, "@PSD and the firms that IT shamelessly advertises at LCI are being blacklisted by community of employees, employers...........for grossly wrong and ill informed conduct, approach, language, being habitual offender and abuser.........and having insatiable itch to provoke, instigate, and be Dangai......."
Contrarily, every such incident pertains to you, which you state about me, when I have proved all your advice and statements 100% wrong, misleading and evasive.
I have already stated, you can only make false allegations, but hopelessly fail to prove even a bit out of vastly exaggerated misleading and false statements. CONTRARILY, I HAVE PROVED ALL OF YOUR STATEMENTS AS YOUR FABRICATED STORIES AND FALSE STATEMENTS.
DON'T WORRY, I STILL GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO PROVE EVEN THIS STATEMENT BY QUOTING EVEN A SINGLE EXAMPLE OF MY BEING BLACKLISTED BY ANYONE.
Blacklisting can be made only of the imposter black sheep, like you, who does not come forward even with real identity, real name, photo and real place of location. Further, why on this very point, take a challenge to drag me in the court of law to prove your point.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
You have addressed the author, as "Dear LCI Author @ Sathyanarayana," and asked him to watch his profile carefully............. IT=@PSD litters IT's=@PSD's trademark TAMASHAA ( IT's=@PSD's own favorite word) nuisance, abuse at profiles of authors/querists, members, experts, in addition to threads................"
QUESTION ARISES, WHAT FOR HE SHOULD WATCH HIS PROFILE, WHEN EACH AND EVERY OF YOUR NUISANCE FILED POSTS APPEARS ON YOUR OWN PROFILE ALONG WITH MY RESPONSE TO EXPOSE YOU ABUNDANTLY. YOU MAY ALSO SEE YOUR PROFILE, AS AN IMPOSTER, WHO DID NOTHING EXCEPT MISGUIDING ONE AND ALL OF THE SOLUTION SEEKER.
In fact, you are a tamasha in yourself, when you start posting useless, meaningless, evasive and misleading posts in plenty just to appease your sould as of a remedy to your chronic disease of making multiple posts, aimlessly.
Guest
(Expert) 12 June 2017
IT-@Imposter/ Fake expert, Kumar Doab,
Now, by when you are fond of getting yourself extensively exposed, I habe fulfilling your wishes by responding to all of your misleading, evasive and meaningless vague posts and also provided you a golden opportunity to make a lot of further evasive, misleading, meaningless posts, if in case your soul is pacified in any way or your chronic disease is cured even to the slightest extent.
Best of luck!
But be sure, now onward, all your vague posts aimed at me would be responded individually to expose you more and more, you imposter.