Conveyance of the said flat in favour of the plaintiff or hi
SHYAMSUNDER BUBNA
(Querist) 22 July 2018
This query is : Open
IN ORDER DATED 10TH MARCH 2015 THE HON'BLE COURT DIRECTED THE COURT RECEIVER TO PROCEED WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE THREE CONVEYANCES INCLUDING THE CONVEYANCE OF THE SAID FLAT IN FAVOUR OF THE PLAINTIFF OR HIS NOMINEES ON THE BASIS OF UNDERTAKING TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE MADE HEREINAFTER AGAINST HIM ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION, AND THE SAID UNDERTAKING IS ACCEPTED AS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE COURT.
THE NOMINEE OF THE PURCHASER IN FURTHERANCE OF ORDER DATED 10.03.2015 HEREBY UNDERTAKE TO INDEMNIFY THE COURT RECEIVER IN RELATION TO ANY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE AGAINST COURT RECEIVER ON ACCOUNT OF EXECUTION OF TRANSFER DEEDS, FORMS AND CONVEYANCES IN THIS FASHION AND THIS UNDERTAKING IS AN UNDERTAKING TO THE HON'BLE COURT.
An agreement for sale of Flat No. 401/401A along with Stilt Parking in Basement of Benhur Apartment has been executed on 28th August 2017 by you in favor alleged Nominee of Plaintiff/Auction Purchaser M/s. Oomerbhoy Investments Pvt. Ltd. along with confirming parties. This is pertinent to note that Nominee of any party must be individuals and not the Corporate Body. Nominee a person in whose name title to real estate or ownership of stock is held but who is not the actual proprietor or holder.
