27 evidence act

salilkumarp (Querist) 13 September 2008 This query is : Resolved
two accused persons were tried for an offence u/s 379 r/w 34 ipc. 2 nd accused was im- plicated on the basis of an alleged confession of 1 st accused.how far ths confession admissible, especially when recovery was effected from 1 st accused ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ARVIND JAIN (Expert) 17 September 2008
If no recovery on the basis of the discloser, cofession not applicable on the 2nd accused.
I leave it open for further comments.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Shall i remove her name from health insurance policy
Legal advice on gifting of residential flat in mumbai.
Status order stalling promotions
Lottery winner
Lottery winner
Indexation on ltcg on property sale
Protection of mobile call records
Ni act 138 by mistake wrong answer given
Pocso act
Complaint under sc/st act

Vacation judge
Legal notice used for harrasment
Settlement
What is the meaning of possession (legally) of apartment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content
Validity of legal notice.....