LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Bringing matter before court

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 29 October 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Mr. A has filed a WRIT to dissmiss order of Tribunal before highcourt aganist Mr. B and the said WRIT is dismissed at admission stage itself as too late(more than 35 yrs). can Mr. C who is in possession of property under B through agrmnt of sale take the advantage of said Judgment in a Injunction suit filed Mr.A aganist Mr. C. Mr. B is title holder of property which is in Mr.C's possession. Do the said Jdgment Bind on Mr.C though Mr. C is not a party in the said WRIT. But C's name is projected in the said WRIT memo. Pls advice
Further :in the WRIT Mr. A's contention was he was not aware of the Land Reforms Tribunal's judgment and he was not a party and the property subject to the judgment is in his possession on the basis of WILL of his father and that he came to know about said jdgmnt only after Mr. C started claiming that Mr. C entered into agreement with Mr. B to purchase the portion of subject property. The Court after preliminary hearing rejected the petition reasoning Not impresed with the A's reason and also mentioned in Order if Mr. A was not party of the tribunal proceeding he should have known by this time that his posession is in threat. since the writ came to quash the order of tribunal after 35 years it is a stale claim. Mr.A filed Writ aganist Mr. B on Jan 2010. Mr. A filed injunction suit aganist Mr. C on Oct 2010 and in the said suit Mr. B was not made party and also not mentioned about the Writ. The Writ Petition rejected on Sep 2011. The suit aganist Mr. C is now posted for Mr. A's evedence. Can Mr. C bring this matter before the trail court since Mr. C is claiming that he is in posession on the basis of agrement for sale with Mr. B
ajay sethi (Expert) 29 October 2011
state facts chronologically . you have jumbled up the facts
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 29 October 2011
Mr. A is playing double game damaging his case adversely. He must have impleaded B in his suit as cause of action in this case was separate than his writ especially when C is claiming his possession through B by way of agreement to sale in his favour.

C can bring the matter of dismissal of writ in the ongoing suit and what benefit can go in his favour is unknown without going through contents of writ and written statement filed by C.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 29 October 2011
I go with Mr. Mr. Makkad.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :