Y Singh N Rajput
(Querist) 04 April 2015
This query is : Resolved
I need latest judgement of supreme court / high court on the verdict that a person who is having a possession of the immovable property is not entitled / eligible for temporary injection.[ REF. CPC ORDER 39 RULE 1 ]
secondly , the plaintiff is not entitled for the temporary judgement when the relief asked in the main suit and in the stay application is one and the same.
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
(Expert) 05 April 2015
Z is agent of Y ! Suit by Real Owner against his Agent ! Possession of Z on behalf of Y as per Records and Y Letter Head (alleged Fraud Letter )!
Nature of Possession of -Z - independent that of Y /or/ for and on behalf of Y !
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 06 April 2015
Incomplete information and vague query. Consult a local lawyer with all relevant documents.
Y Singh N Rajput
(Querist) 07 April 2015
the plaintiff is not entitled for the temporary judgement when the relief asked in the main suit and in the stay application is one and the same.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 09 April 2015
The queries appear to be very vague or devoid of correct information enabling a proper opinion.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup