Impleading

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 08 January 2012 This query is : Resolved
I was a banker on VRS in 2001.In 1996 I was suspended stating that there was a CBI case against me and that CBI case was dropped without involving me in the charge sheet and was over in 1998.As such Exonerated.But the DA reinstated me in 12/2000(55Months) without the back wages for the suspension period.After Appealing to the AA and the Review Authority without avail I filed a writ in the HC-MDS in 2002.The case came for final hearing now.But I have made only the CMD & the ED as respondents I &II not the DA ,the author of the Impugned original order,that forbid the payment of my back wages.The kind judge had asked me to challenge the original order in the prayer.Now should I imp lead the DA as a respondent as R-III,or can I file the original copy of the original order in the affidavit and proceed the case .Please give me a detailed reply.
Trindia.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 09 January 2012
Please reply

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 09 January 2012
Make DA as a one of the OP as no order is binding upon a person or authority if he or it is not a party to the case.
Do use the liberty given by the high court by adding DA a party to Writ petition.

Deepak Nair (Expert) 09 January 2012
I agree with Mr.Barman. Since the court itself has advised you to implead the DA, make DA as respondent no.3 in the case.