LAWyersclubindia LCI
Login  Register
LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

citation but not the hole case.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 15 April 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Marutiudyog ltd vs. Ramlal (2005) 2 SC 638.
&
In CIT vs. B.R. Constructions (1999) 202 ITR 222 (AP) CFB.
&

SC in Ssouth India Corp Ltd vs. Secretary Borad of Revenue.


Required the hole case in detail pls any one provide me. it explain in depth of
It is not there in indiankoon.com so pls do the needful

The citation gives the non - obstante clause interpretation by the SC in depth.

Report Abuse
M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 26 August 2015
anonymous/academic query can not be answered..

Previous
Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :



Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Laws Follow us





Browse by Category

Stay updated with latest Posts!