How to speed up the partition suit filed in district court

Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 28 August 2011
This query is : Resolved
Sir, Please Guide, :
Partition Suit filed in the District court one month before.. : First Summon on 25/08/2011, After lot of discussion I engaged the lawyer and Ist Installment paid 5k, but when I go to court : Judge on Leave, the case put on some other date..
I surprise to know that How this court functions, when they send summon mentioning the date, but on that date Judge take's leave, I didn't get any info.. : after visiting the court I came to know that Judge on Leave, Waste of may name, and Lawyer telling me if I don't engage the lawyer, then the case go for Ex-partie : How it is true ?,
Next day District Judge called for the Monthly meeting for the discussion of How to speed up the pending cases..: It is really just as a Eye wash meeting because SC insist to do the same,
Please guide me : Partition suit filed to put me in trouble & because of Suit I am not able to sale my properties, I should not sale the properties that is the intention of the person who file this partition suit.., My Lawyer say It take min. one year to get some way out.. till the time I have to await..
I feel it is totally unfair,
Can I send the Registered Letter to District court Judge about this case and request to consider / suggest speedy trail / end.. :
What kind of action's I can take, : partition suit don't carry any merits.. & even It have merits just 5% share they are eligible to get.. but they are not at all discussed before going to court, and their basic intention is to put me in trouble and not allow me to sale as I wish..
Case in Tamil Nadu.. District court : because the valuation of properties shows more then 25L.

Guest
(Expert) 28 August 2011
ONCE PARTITION SUIT FILED IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY CREATE THE LIS PENDENCE. OTHER DETAILS I REPLIED EARLIER. I SUGGEST TO SETTLE THE MATTER WITH LOK ADALAT FOR AMICABLE AND SPEEDY DISPOSAL.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 28 August 2011
Expert : S.GANESAN.LAWYER have adequately answered you.