LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

BAIL U/S 439 IN HIGH COURT IN IPC 376 2 G

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 21 April 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Sir,
i would like to know whether bail is possible in a case where the prosecutrix has not taken the name of the accused petitioners in the FIR but has taken the names of accused petitioners in sec 161 and she has not given her statement in sec 164 where almost 2 months have been passed since the offence. moreover the injury report is not suggesting any offence against her. Fsl has also not been done.
the accused petitioners are in J.C.

now after 4 to 5 hearings prosecutrix has taken the names of the accused petitioners in 164 but at some other time as she mentioned in FIR , she is changing her statement time,
whether in these new circumstances defence can take these things for getting bail
M.Sheik Mohammed Ali (Expert) 21 April 2011
depend up on the circumstantial report and evidence, the court may decided.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 21 April 2011
Yes the case seems to have good merit for getting bail.
Kiran Kumar (Expert) 27 April 2011
good case for grant of concession of bail.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :