Departmental inquiry
mala
(Querist) 17 March 2012
This query is : Resolved
CHARGE NO 1
“That you deliquent employee no 1 Mr K used to unauthorisedly visit Sh N S then posted in ‘Section II with ulterior motive to ascertain the status of files. “
CHARGE NO. 2
“ That Criminal Appeal Nos 005 was directed to be included in the weekly list commencing from 10.2.2009 and these Appeals were updated on computer on 5.2.2009 at 1512 Hrs. The information was accessible over intranet and weekly list for week commencing from 10.2.2009 was generated on 5.2.2009 at 1730 hrsand the above appeals were shown in the weekly list of matters coming up before Court No 4 at page 73 thereof. That you Deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 being employees of the Supreme Court having access to Judicial and Listing Sections and being aware of listing procedures although it was none of the job of yours somehow obtained official information regarding orders of Listing of Criminal hich matter was to be listed by sources and means exclusively in your knowledge and thereby conducted misconduct.”
CHARGE NO 3
“That on 5.2.2009 he andf his advocatyecame to the and met Deliquent Employee No 1 and you Deliquent Employee No 2 met them and in your presence Advocate Saha that your were asking Rs 75000/- for early listing of the cases. That you personally demanded Rs 75000/- from Dr Saha for listing of the matter for Final Hearing within 3 4 weeks and thereby conducted grave mi
CHARGE NO 4
“That you deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 on 6 2 2009 soon after Weekly List No 5/2009 for the week 10 – 12 February 2009 was rolled out, immediately secured a copy of the same and accompanied by Advocate went to Saha in the evening and showed the Weekly List to Saha and demanded the bribe of Rs 75000/- That when Saha insisted that matter must come in Daily List. You Deliquent No 2 informed Saha that the matter would be in the Daily List within 2 3 weeks and Saha then initially promised to make only part payment of Rs 25000/- You and the other Deliquent Employee thereby committed a grave misconduct.”
CHARGE NO 4
“That you deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 on 6 2 2009 soon after Weekly List No 5/2009 for the week 10 – 12 February 2009 was rolled out, immediately secured a copy of the same and accompanied by Advocate n went to Saha in the evening and showed the Weekly List to Saha and demanded the bribe of Rs 75000/- That when Saha insisted that matter must come in Daily List. You Deliquent No 2 informed Saha that the matter would be in the Daily List within 2 3 weeks and Saha then initially promised to make only part payment of Rs 25000/- You and the other Deliquent Employee thereby committed a grave misconduct.”
MY QUERY
AND FACTS
FACT IS that the said information was available on internet on 5 2 2009 at 1512 hrs onwards and any adv or anybody can access the same inpayment of rs 20/-
I never met any one for obtainig any information
Pl suggest all the witnesses have been cross examined and no one has said anything against me except the complainant
What steps further should I take
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Why are you starting new thread on each clarification.
None has time to act as detective and link your previous threads.
Based on what is writtne above, without any regard to any other thread your present questions can be reacted as under.
The chargeshet is vague. You believe that all witnesses has deposed in your favour. At times the accused remains under such impression and the actual meaning of deposition put togather with documents is at times different.
If you have already cross-examined the witnesses, it appears that you have a Def Asstt and you should trust on him (or would have changed. If you hve gone about with Def Asstt then nothing can be advised now.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 23 March 2012
No comments.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
