Departmental inquiry
mala
(Querist) 16 March 2012
This query is : Resolved
Sir
I hv recd sufficient feed back from your goodselves thankyou
Sir
I have cross examined all th witnesses i.e. departmental witnesses. Non one had told anything against. The complainant was cross examined and subsequently he was again examined before the court . Before the department and before the trial court he gave different versions ' When pointd out the difference he protested ad said the departmental inquiry the statement signed by me has typing errors
Now pleae suggest me
1. I have filed an appln for stay of this departmental inquiry pending adjudication before the criminal court of law
The said appln was refused and I appealed
2. In case of refusal by the authority What steps can i take further.
2. Whether can I recall for re examination any witnesses including the complainanat, CBI Insp.
3. Whether I go for an appeal against the order in a CAT
4. Whether I give a supplementary statement
5. Whether I request for examnation of defense witnesses
6. Whether I ask them to file a specific,and correct chargesheet Since I am sure that the complaint is false and I have done nothing wrong When I have done nothing there cannot be any date or time
Pleas e suggest me and help me from ruing my lie by unscrupulous people
The complainant has till date has fuiled 2032 Petitions in Indian Courts.
3 Curative Petitions
Several cases against Judges of Hon High Court especially against a Kolkata High Court Judge and also against a gujarath high court judge
venkatesh Rao
(Expert) 16 March 2012
Pl. unfold the story chronologically and experts can give an apt solution.
Guest
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Dear Mala,
Your fresh query, totally delinked from the original query pertaining to the problem may not help you much to get proper guidance. You seem to have mixed the departmental inquiry with the court case. Both are quite distinct in themselves. It is not understood, whether you talk about proceedings during departmental inquiry or the proceedings of the CAT or court.
It is also not understood, what concern the cases of Kolkata & Gujarat High Court judges, and also the 2032 Petitions in Indian Courts filed by the compalinant have with your own case of departmental inquiry and how an individual can manage to handle 2032 court cases in his life.
Sorry to point out, unless you make things clear, you would get, yourself, confused if you get divergent replies from experts.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 17 March 2012
which query you refers??
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Dear Malaji,
You should have briefly mentioned your earlier query.This is just enough for us to go through but we require the complete case history to get the correct advice from our experts.I have been requesting the querists so many times to give the complete case history.Yes,no,alright is not the solution.
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Dear Experts
This is her earlier query.
CHARGE NO 1
“That you deliquent employee no 1 Mr K used to unauthorisedly visit Sh N S then posted in ‘Section II with ulterior motive to ascertain the status of files. “
CHARGE NO. 2
“ That Criminal Appeal Nos 005 was directed to be included in the weekly list commencing from 10.2.2009 and these Appeals were updated on computer on 5.2.2009 at 1512 Hrs. The information was accessible over intranet and weekly list for week commencing from 10.2.2009 was generated on 5.2.2009 at 1730 hrsand the above appeals were shown in the weekly list of matters coming up before Court No 4 at page 73 thereof. That you Deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 being employees of the Supreme Court having access to Judicial and Listing Sections and being aware of listing procedures although it was none of the job of yours somehow obtained official information regarding orders of Listing of Criminal hich matter was to be listed by sources and means exclusively in your knowledge and thereby conducted misconduct.”
CHARGE NO 3
“That on 5.2.2009 he andf his advocatyecame to the and met Deliquent Employee No 1 and you Deliquent Employee No 2 met them and in your presence Advocate Saha that your were asking Rs 75000/- for early listing of the cases. That you personally demanded Rs 75000/- from Dr Saha for listing of the matter for Final Hearing within 3 4 weeks and thereby conducted grave mi
CHARGE NO 4
“That you deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 on 6 2 2009 soon after Weekly List No 5/2009 for the week 10 – 12 February 2009 was rolled out, immediately secured a copy of the same and accompanied by Advocate went to Saha in the evening and showed the Weekly List to Saha and demanded the bribe of Rs 75000/- That when Saha insisted that matter must come in Daily List. You Deliquent No 2 informed Saha that the matter would be in the Daily List within 2 3 weeks and Saha then initially promised to make only part payment of Rs 25000/- You and the other Deliquent Employee thereby committed a grave misconduct.”
CHARGE NO 4
“That you deliquent Employee No 1 and 2 on 6 2 2009 soon after Weekly List No 5/2009 for the week 10 – 12 February 2009 was rolled out, immediately secured a copy of the same and accompanied by Advocate n went to Saha in the evening and showed the Weekly List to Saha and demanded the bribe of Rs 75000/- That when Saha insisted that matter must come in Daily List. You Deliquent No 2 informed Saha that the matter would be in the Daily List within 2 3 weeks and Saha then initially promised to make only part payment of Rs 25000/- You and the other Deliquent Employee thereby committed a grave misconduct.”
MY QUERY
AND FACTS
FACT IS that the said information was available on internet on 5 2 2009 at 1512 hrs onwards and any adv or anybody can access the same inpayment of rs 20/-
I never met any one for obtainig any information
Pl suggest all the witnesses have been cross examined and no one has said anything against me except the complainant
What steps further should I take
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Malaji,
I have gone through your earlier queries.
Another thing is the chargesheet itself is a bit confusing.It is not according to the service rules and regulations.It can certainly be challenged and immediately be in touch with a competent advocate who is well versed and experienced in service rules.
Whoever it is the accused person will get relief.You have mentioned that you have already submitted an application (petition) for staying the departmental enquiry.What are the contents of the petition?You have also mentioned CBI.Has the case gone to that extent.You can think of the other aspects you have mentioned only after your petition is allowed.
Don't get dejected as there will be a certain way to come out only if you have not committed any departmental offence.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 17 March 2012
Not able to understand the query.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Guest
(Expert) 18 March 2012
Shonee ji,
To me it is a mix up of deprtmental inquiry case and a court case, which has also been blended with a CBI case under PC Act. That is why I asked for clarification from Ms. Mala.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 23 March 2012
Still not clear to me sir.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
