prashant vithal kadam
30 September 2009 at 22:43
sir,
we had filed a easementary suit for extra 4 feet pasthway apart from the seven feet width which we had purchased from the defendants. now the court has rejected it by saying that we have disturbed the existing pathway by constructing the cement road over that 7 ft. so are we entitles for the extra 4ft width along with seven ft, as we have to also take our 4-wheelers inside.
easementary
sir,
we had filed a easementary suit for extra 4 feet pasthway apart from the seven feet width which we had purchased from the defendants. now the court has rejected it by saying that we have disturbed the existing pathway by constructing the cement road over that 7 ft. so are we entitles for the extra 4ft width along with seven ft, as we have to also take our 4-wheelers inside.