If the hon-ble judge is retired/posted out

Guest (Querist) 30 December 2013 This query is : Resolved
My wri wp 21313 /2013 filed on 16/7 in AP HC.It was transferred to another Judge as soon as admitted on 18/7/13 stated to be wrongly posted by the Registrar.
It was taken up up 8 Aug in court no 5 when the GP home was given two weeks time to file their counter.None is filed as on date.In Oct 2013 my case was transfered to another court court No 10 with another judge. My case has been listed in the cause list at least 4 times in one month at the tail end or on onward list and never ever taken up by the respective judges despite several pleas by my advocate verbal as well as written.Fed up I had taken the NOC in the month of Nov and submited an appeal to the hon'ble CJ to hear me in person and to expedite..it has not happened.Now I find that the said Judge is missing from the list of Judge in court's site. Court No 10 is also not found included..What could be the reason? What happened to my case ? Who decides to whom it will go? And what is the next step if hon'ble CJ finds no time for me to even make a reply.its a life and death situation for my daughter whose admission to MBBS via EAMCET CAP quota is affected by such in action?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ajay sethi (Expert) 30 December 2013
your case will come up in due course . if there is an urgency you have to have the papers produced and ask for matter to be placed on board for urgent reliefs . your lawyer will do the needful

ajay sethi (Expert) 30 December 2013
you can make enquires with the Registry as to whether said judge has retired or has been transferred . generally judges take up cases on basis of assignments given By High court . for instances writs are taken up by a particular bench . you have to mention your case before said bench only

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 30 December 2013
Take up the matter with the court through your lawyer,

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 30 December 2013
You should not worry as the case shall be listed in routine manner and your lawyer should be made aware.

Guest (Querist) 30 December 2013
My Writ is all about admission to MBBS for my daughter based on her EAMCET rank 2013..EAMCET for 2014 has been announced in March 2014. Isn't it a case which should have been heard on priority?
My case was first wrongly posted and to one who was designated to hear Writ on such matters..Counselling for admn started wef 22 Jul 2013 to 29 Jul ( First phase).The second judge took up the matter and instantly gave two weeks time to the respondents..to file their counters..it never happened..the case was listed at the tail end or at the onward list..In Oct 2013 that judge was changed..and now the present judge is missing from the list of judges..I have already taken NOC from my advocate as I found many advocates are taking court slips to take up their cases on priority..its all in black & white.
There must be some SOP somewhere which cases must be taken up first?
Can somebody tell me about it and expand my horizon as I tend to believe my case on domicile issue of an outsider (ESM) is something to do with Telengana agitation..as Seemadhara people will also face the same problem in not so distant future.

Thyagarajan (Expert) 31 December 2013
Do not worry about the people who will be affected like you due to the present local political situation. Entrust your case to a lawyer. As you are not practicing lawyer; do not venture to bring up order in the judicial system.

Guest (Querist) 31 December 2013
@Thyagarajan..excuse me please. Voters in Delhi ventured and AAP got their govt.There must be some determining factors and not tie ups between an advocate and a judge or the Registrar. I am trying to understand why my case was not in the motion list? Why my advocate could not get a court slip which is then slipped into the hands of the deputy registrar who then authenticate it and then send it to posting clerk for an out of turn hearing his case..If the NIC has made it foolproof which it claims to generate cause lists for a week without any manual intervention and accepted by the Lordships at the Apex level why High Courts are still issuing Court slips to its favourites..I am of the view that it is the onerous duty of the officers of the court to ensure cause lists are not manually tampered at any level.

Thyagarajan (Expert) 31 December 2013
Dear Sri Haridas,
Make a brief of your grievance affix Rs 10 judicial stamp and send to Registrar of court addressing your letter as To Public information officer.The PIO is bound to reply you with in 30 days.

Guest (Querist) 02 January 2014
That's like some minister in the UPA II, I think that erstwhile EC ( A sardarji), filing RTI to get his info on his own ministry. Its the perfect example of bouncing the ball into the OTHER'S court.What about the OFFICERS OF THE COURT doing it for us.. for once?

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2014
Meet the High Court Registrar along with your advocate and submit your grievances and he would definitely do the needful

Guest (Querist) 03 January 2014
My erstwhile Advocate ( as I have obtained NOC from him and submitted my application to argue my case as PIP)had represented my case before the hon-ble court ( three judges in 3 months)orally and also submitted in writing three times to the Registrar ( Judicial ) to list my case in motion list ( my case was being listed at the tail ends almost weekly basis ( that shows even those people considered my case urgent but never reached there. On receiving NOC I have submitted a letter addsd to the Chief Justice of AP to grant me an appopintment to present my case in person and to ensure that my case is heard urgently. Neither I am granted an appointment nor my letter ack nor my case heard as on date..I am yet to see any change as to change of Advocate to PIP in its official website..meanwhile my erstwhile Advocate has filed an USSR on 29 Nov. I do not what for..

Guest (Querist) 04 January 2014
My mistake its USR that's been submitted by my erstwhile advocate .....
USR Number Advocate Name USR Type USR Filing Date
WPUSR 13986 /2013 WASIM AHMED KHAN MEMO 27-11-2013..

Guest (Expert) 04 January 2014
Meet the Registrar personally explain your problems and go for solution

Guest (Querist) 04 January 2014
According to the law of the land ( from the horses mouth i.e my advocate )till the time an advocate is engaged the petitioner has no right to meet either the Registrar or present his case at 1030hrs before the hon-ble judge.In fact when I visited the office of the Registrar (three times) I was told none other than the Deputy Registrar, as Registrar found no time for me even to hear me for a minute ( He is now upgraded to another hon-ble judge of the same high court)that it is the duty of my advocate to raise the issue before the court as they have no auth or power to reschedule the cause list. When confronted with the question how the Judge decides and whether it is given in black & white the Deputy Registrar said " No it all given verbally".That's the trick. Put the ball onto other's court. It is therefore a necessity to venture overhauling the system..Either the hon-ble Judge on completion of the day's argument gives the next date then & there and record it in the case sheet as it is being done at the trial courts or leave the responsibility to the NIC.COM which claims to have the software installed to prep cause list without any manual intervention with vested interest (This vested interest include the practising lawyers as well as they present their case before the Hon-ble Judge and get the Court slip which is not digitalised , machine numbered or accountable and is put to great abuse by the court oficer and the Registrar ofice, the posting clerks etc etc.
Its time hon-ble judges come down to mother earth and allow prep of cause list without their intervention.
I will wait for the day it to happen rather trying a TIE-UP with the Registrar (Judicial) who has failed in his duties. Aam Admi is catching up,

Thyagarajan (Expert) 05 January 2014
You are up to wait for something to happen. All the best

Guest (Querist) 06 January 2014
No I will make it happen in my life time..Aam Admi is catching up. There is Change India campaign where "Self Attestation as is being practiced instead of Notarised affidavit" is already in the pipe line.Each and every lawyer knows how it benefits the lawyers.com
So is the business of issuing chits to the favourites based on castes or religion in the most adhoc manner..The judges are human too they are to err and hence they must be dealt as Aam Admi when they are caught.

Guest (Querist) 06 January 2014
This is a cut and paste job from the NIC.in website..But Yourlordships are themselves ensuring that the noble aim & objectives of LOBIS are defeated by issuing Chits for some consideration. The Lawyers.com are too indifferent as such Gigri-Pogri are essential for their commercial success.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List of Business Information System (LOBIS) :
It is about scheduling of cases to be heard by the courts on the following day. It enabled the Registries of Supreme Court and High Courts in eliminating manual process of Cause List generation thus any manipulation by vested interests.....

Impact :
As Cause Lists are generated automatically by the computer manual intervention has been eliminated resulting in generation of Cause List in time with out any hassle
Cases are listed strictly in chronological order of date of filing; eliminated irregularities
All cases having the same law point(s) to be decided by the courts are bunched/grouped and posted before one bench.

NOBLE OBJECTIVES...HC of AP supposedly cent percent computerised..But Advocates gets the CHITS anyway and CAUSE LISTS are then tampered..
Can somebody tell me how the cases are clubbed ? What is meant by same LAW POINT? How my Writ get listed at 263 or 191 after 100 days with three Judges changed and somebody gets a chit..

Guest (Querist) 11 January 2014
My ONLINE RTI QUERY TO JUSTICE DEPT ON PREP OF CAUSELISTS BY THE HIGH COURTS:--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority Department of Justice

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
* Name Haridas Mandal
Gender Male
* Address Flat No 401 Ushodaya Apts , SV Colony RK Puram, Sec-Bad
Pincode 500056
Country India
State Andhra Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-27790895
Mobile Number +91-9704679309
Email-ID hmganjali23[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
* Description of Information Sought
I wish to raise a RTI query on the Registry of the Court on the following(

a ) How fresh cases are registered , posted against a Judge and seriality fixed for the designated Judge to hear that fresh case

b) At this stage who all are responsible to allot a case to a specific Judge and what are the laid down guiding priciples for the Registry of the Court.

c) Who is the Initiating officer of the Registrar ( Judicial)

d) Once listed at any serial and heard on that very day what methodology is followed for the next hearing Is it as per the sole discretion of the Judge as it is followed by the Lower Courts where at the end of hearing the case a specific date is fixed for next hearing (court officer who is available with the event calender duly consulted).

e) Does the Judge fixed the next date as well as the seriality of the case on that day If not who is entrusted with Is it the Registrar or the Court Officer

f) What all are parameters that entalis a case to listed on priority listed at the top on a day Is it left to the Judge or the court officer or the Registrar

g) Whether the cases thus heard , if not final order is arrived at, gets date and a serial number on that day in any consolidated list handed over to the registry through court officer Is it a confidential document at that point of time

h)Those cases listed both in Prints and ONWARD if not heard due to some reason or other how the next date is fixed for those cases Do the honble judge mark a date and seriality in each case for the next hearing If not whether the same is sent unmarked to the registry with or without approval of the Honble Judge to be listed delayed in the main list at any serial number as per the whims and fancies of the posting clerk/the asst registrar or the Registrar

j) What about some chits being issued by the honble Judge to some advocates which are converted into priority chits and the list already prepared WITH LOTS OF EFFORTS get breached Does this so called priority chit bear the signature of the Honble Judge, a date and a seriality when that case will be taken up

k) Why those chits are then sent to Asst Registrar for his signature before it is sent to posting clerk under Registrar ( Judicial)

l) Are those sacred chits which breach the already prepared printed lists are maintained for Records If yes who s the custodian of those Sacred Chits Where those are kept and whether those can be displayed for public consumption

m) In the whole activities of assigning a date , a serial number in the main list or some ONWARD list against a Judge between a a designated Court and the Registry to posting clerk where does Cjustice of the High Court of AP figures Is he the administrative boss of the Registrar Is he the Initiatiing officer of the Registrar ( Judicial) Is he responsible to have in place to ensure that cases are listed as per the laid down parameters and no breach whatso ever takes place in any of the court.

* Concerned CPIO Z. A. Khan
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB) Supporting document not provided

Online RTI Status Form
Registration Number JUSTC/R/2013/60371/1
Name Haridas Mandal
Date of Filing 30/12/2013
Request filed with Department of Justice
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 11/01/2014
Reply :- For obtaining information on the above points you may please contact CPIO of concerned High Court. As of now, there is no provision to transfer on-line RTI application to High Court. Thank you.
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number
Email Id somcell-justice-mha@nic.in

Guest (Querist) 11 January 2014
Now I will be sending my query to the CPIO of the High Court of AP and hope to get some sensible reply..Pl Wish me good luck.

Thyagarajan (Expert) 12 January 2014
Good you took the RTI route.
Convey the progress of you complaint.
We are there to help you step by step.

Guest (Querist) 12 January 2014
That's why lawyers are called Devil's Advoo cates..they want to hog the lime and the light on someone else's cost..do some good things to the society being the respected officers of the courts.And one more request...pl do not present your case b4 the judge at 1030hrs or 1415hrs or at 1625hrs asking for a priority slip..let the software installed by NIC.IN functions without any manual interventions..

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 12 January 2014
Mr.Haridas,

I suggest you to see the cause list of the court, it will say about the sitting arrangements of the judges for the day. This sitting arrangements is being planned by case type wise, year wise.

If you have any urgency, you can mention before the court and give a letter to the registry, the court will give priority to the senior citizen.

You are very good in drafting, and communications, so I suggest you to appear as party in person.

Guest (Querist) 13 January 2014
My Writ petition number is WP 21313/2013, filed on 16/7/2013 regd on 18/7/2013. There are already 2 Judges changed and its pending before the third judge..So in my case sitting arrangement seems to be changed on bi-monthly basis.I am not sure whether there will be another change of Judge on 20 Jan when court resumes.
I am now-a-days seing the cause lists for Court No 10 For Hon-Ble Justice Ramesh Parameswaran..It was last listed ( not listed in the printed list) but found mentioned in the onward list with no serial number on 10 Dec 2013.
Utterly disgusted I asked for NOC from my advocate who failed to get a court slip from the hob-ble Judges ( Three of Them in the last 6 months)and NOC has since been given on 22 Oct 2013.On the same day I had filed an application along with a copy of that NOC to the CJ AP HC requesting him of a personal hearing and to post my case at the earliest..But as per the APHC.NIC it is still listed on the name of my erstwhile advocate who has now advised me to submit the original copy of the NOC to the Registrar ( Judicial) as soon as the court opens on 20 Jan..So I need help as I found contradictory orders of the high courts as well as supreme court on the issue of domiciliary of the state though every one confirms that one could be domicile of India only and there is no such thing called domicile of a state..however a state can insists on certain parameters to be fulfilled to be eligible to avail concessions of thatstate..in the instant case my application for CAP quota for my daughter's admission to MBBS was rejected by the ZSWO RanGa Reddy stating" you are not considered a domicile of AP & You havenot commissioned from the state of AP" hence CAP quota denied..It has invoked the auth of a letter DTE OF AP Sainik Welfare which in turn has relied upon an order of the APHC on a writ Appeal wa 951 &952 of 2006...It made passing remarks "That mere residence for 5 years will not make an ESM eligible for CAP quota ..he has to be domicile of that state"..The hon-ble judges heavily relied upon a circular of the Dte Gen of Resettlement for ESM which stated " to avail concessions/facilities ofered by a state ESM has to be domicile of that state.
It is obvious both i.e Dte Gen of Resettlement as well as Honble division bench of AP HC (WA 951 &952 OF 2006) are contradicting the very pronouncement of the supreme court which settled the issue stating that there is no such thing as domicile of a state besides being a domicile of India. It is loosele used which in effect means the person is expected to be resident of that state for a specified years. In the instant case as per GO Ms 370 of 1994 ( still in vogue) one has to live for 5 years in AP to be eligible for CAP quota for his /her children. Pl help me as I am preparing for my argument as a PIP when the court takes up my case..

V R SHROFF (Expert) 13 January 2014
you demand urgent hearing [ age]

Guest (Querist) 13 January 2014
@VR Shroff how? Secondly I need to know whether the GP Home representing all the three respondents who has failed to submit their counter within two weeks ( not yet filed) still can be given chance to argue its case or the hon-ble Judge should proceed with petition already before the hon-ble Judge?
Is it not contempt of court for not filing counter within two weeks time? Or just because the court did not take up my Writ not for once there after will come as an excuse for the GP Home..Pl do advise me as I am rearing to argue my first case as PIP and wish to do a good job.

Guest (Querist) 13 January 2014
In the month of Oct my erstwhile Advocate took up my case while the Hon-ble Judge was about to retire for the day requesting posting my writ in the motion list or at least give some urgency keeping in view of the carrear of my daughter in jeopardy. The hon-ble was not impressed. Further in the open court he said as per supreme court ruling all counselling are to be over by 30 Sep and hence my case deserve no special consideration and will be taken up in the routine manner..May I request the experts in this panel to provide me the link of the supreme court ruling which is sacrosant as the counselling of candiadtes for MBBS admissions in AP..It will immensely help me to argue my case as my writ was filed on 16/7 . regd on 18/7 taken up on 8 Aug but never taken up there after knowing the urgency of my case.

Guest (Querist) 14 January 2014
Just now I found from the high court of AP website that my writ is now listed on 20 Jan 2014..the day court re-opens.Guess and tell..Will it be at serial No 335, 249, 177, 79 of on the motion list..no reward for guessing the wrong one.
And it is till listed against my advocate who has already handed over the case to me with NOC..I do not wish to delay its hearing on such technical point..can I ask my advocate to be present?

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 14 January 2014
You can ask your new advocate present in the hearing, let him make his submission.

V R SHROFF (Expert) 14 January 2014
brief ur adv in advance to mention the matter [age factor for expedite] and argue on 20-1-14.

Guest (Querist) 15 January 2014
I am not engaging any new advocate. I have taken NOC and submitted my application for PIP. ..I need to know the link wherein Supreme Court has stated that all counselling for admissions be completed latest by 30 Sep. I just do not wish to ask for any further time and insist that an order either way be passed as the Respondents have failed to submit any counter affidavit there by forgoing their right to contradict my submision on the issue..would you please help me with cut & paste for important decisions of the various High Courts and Supreme court on the issue of :
a) Domicialary of a state means nothing more than a permanent add with intent to stay.
b) That if there was an order on the subject by the Supreme Court to complete all such admissions latest by 30 Sep the onus lied on the court to arr final hearing before 30 Sep. And if not done the order must be 'either way'with retropestive effect.

Guest (Querist) 15 January 2014
In the instant case the present Judge will ( if at all my writ comes up by the divine intervention)hear the case for the first time..will he be privy to the notes taken if any by the his predessesor ( who heard the case once on 8 Aug 2013)? or will it be like a fresh case for the present Judge?
Who will be given the first chance ..the GP for the Respondent or the Petitioner?

Guest (Querist) 30 January 2014
I cross-checked the site for the status of my Writ..It is still listed against my Writ on 20 Jan 2014 though it was found included in the daily cause list..for any Judge or in the entire cause list..for 20 Jan 2014. It needs no rocket science that there are mischief mongers inside registrar's office in ap HC.
And there after there is no trace of my writ either against my Advocate,my name as PIP,Honble Judge at court No 10 etc etc..What a great country we have with what a great judiciary with ofice of the Registrar must be in consultation with lordships playing havoc on my daughter's career. We need some aam admi here to take the judiciary..Changing to Jury system is the only answer..Judges have failed the nation.

Guest (Expert) 30 January 2014
Mr.Haridas mandal only one thing I could tell you when crooks and narrow minded people are with their intelligence and power we should be above them with what we have our minds .Fight if no enemy there is no Krishna.

Guest (Querist) 31 January 2014
My RTI to Justice Dept ONLINE returned unactioned stating High Courts are not yet inter-netted. I submitted the same query affixing Rs 10 postal order..It came back unactioned asking me to affix Rs 25 instaed. I have resubmitted that.I am sure Registry of High Court of AP will reply my queries..A USR was filed by my erstwhile advocate stating removal his name against my writ..I demanded a copy of the same..It is recd today... Funny thing his name excluded but my name as party in person not included..and my case not listed at all..

Guest (Querist) 02 February 2014
There is a proverb 'when the going gets tough,tough gets going"..The prep of cause list and issue of cheats sorry chits after the official hours creates limitless rumours..This demon of issuing cheats sorry chits only reflects poor has created an excldefeating the very purpose of having an expensive softwares ..But we are sure there..If the numbers shown by the LawyersclubofIndia is right there will be silent revolution and I will ensure this point is taken note of during my presentation of my case as PIP in not so distant future..Tough must get going.

Guest (Querist) 10 February 2014
My RTI query with Rs 25 in postal orders have come back in original without the original appl..this time stating that all the postal orders stand time barred..going to the post office to clarify , re-validate and att afresh..I am hell bent on bringing transparency in the prep of daily cause list by the automated computer process with no manual intervention..which include the Hon-ble Judges as well as they are the ones issuing chits by the dozens allowing their court clerks to get the already generated cause list to amend and insert their Cheats sorry chits sorry court slips..I saw them by the dozens with court clerk for court No 10..
And appeal these more than two lacs members where ever they are not to ask for Cheats sorry chits sorry court slip with or without any logistic considerations from their so called pious wholly honest insulated from castes creed community gotras etc etc Hon-ble Judges..let the NIC.COM software do the talking with no fear or favour and the cause list be generated within a few minutes of the court closed officially for the day..lets not allow even the judges to go and make changes in the automatically generated cause list inside the darkness of his chamber..let the sunshine comes in and brighten all of us..Jai Aam Admi.

Guest (Querist) 17 February 2014
CASE STATUS INFORMATION SYSTEM
WP 21313 / 2013 WPSR 112751 / 2013 CASE IS:PENDING
PETITIONER RESPONDENT
LT.COLONEL HARIDAS MANDAL, HYDERABAD, & ANR. VS THE GOVT.OF A.P.,SAINIK WELFARE,HYD.,& 2 OTRS.
PET.ADV. : PARTY-IN-PERSON RESP.ADV. : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
SUBJECT: SOCIAL WELFARE & TRIBAL WELFARE(MISC.MATTERS) DISTRICT: HYDERABAD
FILING DATE: 16-07-2013 POSTING STAGE : INTERLOCUTORY(HOME)
REG. DATE : 18-07-2013 LISTING DATE : 11-02-2014 STATUS : ---------
HON'BLE JUDGE(S): NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Latest status of my case..updated by the most efficient registry only on 14 Feb 2014..36 Crores Goddesses

Guest (Querist) 17 February 2014
CASE STATUS INFORMATION SYSTEM
WP 21313 / 2013 WPSR 112751 / 2013 CASE IS:PENDING
PETITIONER RESPONDENT
LT.COLONEL HARIDAS MANDAL, HYDERABAD, & ANR. VS THE GOVT.OF A.P.,SAINIK WELFARE,HYD.,& 2 OTRS.
PET.ADV. : PARTY-IN-PERSON RESP.ADV. : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
SUBJECT: SOCIAL WELFARE & TRIBAL WELFARE(MISC.MATTERS) DISTRICT: HYDERABAD
FILING DATE: 16-07-2013 POSTING STAGE : INTERLOCUTORY(HOME)
REG. DATE : 18-07-2013 LISTING DATE : 11-02-2014 STATUS : ---------
HON'BLE JUDGE(S): NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

Latest status of my case..updated by the most efficient registry only on 14 Feb 2014..36 Crores Goddesses can not even instill fear among the crooks..Jai Aam Admi..
I have submitted my RTI query through CAPIO (Head Post Office Trimulgherry)..Lets see what excuse this time the Registry finds to return my RTI query back.

Guest (Querist) 24 February 2014
I am determined to fight the evil in posting of pending cases and changing of Judges for no good.
Devil's advocates are too weak too mean.They are incapable of fighting for a cause. This is a unique and noble cause. To dis-engage Hon-ble Judges from fixing the match sorry prep of cause list inside their dark chambers and not in the open court.

Guest (Querist) 05 March 2014
WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH ,TOUGHS GET GOING..REGISTRY IS SHAKEN AT LEAST..
Nothing has changed much..it is still pending but some people are seen acting silently. Though respondent adv has remained unchange i.e GP for social affair subject now has been changed to Home Deptt ( Misc) and in the wakalatlama GP for Home has now been included.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WP 21313 / 2013 WPSR 112751 / 2013 CASE IS:PENDING
PETITIONER RESPONDENT
LT.COLONEL HARIDAS MANDAL, HYDERABAD, & ANR. VS THE GOVT.OF A.P.,SAINIK WELFARE,HYD.,& 2 OTRS.
PET.ADV. : PARTY-IN-PERSON RESP.ADV. : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
SUBJECT: HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) DISTRICT: HYDERABAD
FILING DATE: 16-07-2013 POSTING STAGE : INTERLOCUTORY(HOME)
REG. DATE : 18-07-2013 LISTING DATE : 11-02-2014 STATUS : ---------
HON'BLE JUDGE(S): NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
P / R No. Advocate Code Advocate Name
null 1490 VISHNUVARDHAN REDDY(ASST SOL GEN)
null 1977 GP FOR HOME

Guest (Querist) 31 March 2014
And this is the status as on today..it was last updated on 11 Feb 2014.There ar4 already change of four Judges and the court..without case being taken up ( except once..admitted on 8/82013). And another change of Judge is in the air.

Guest (Querist) 18 April 2014
CASE STATUS INFORMATION SYSTEM
WP 21313 / 2013 WPSR 112751 / 2013 CASE IS:PENDING
PETITIONER RESPONDENT
LT.COLONEL HARIDAS MANDAL, HYDERABAD, & ANR. VS THE GOVT.OF A.P.,SAINIK WELFARE,HYD.,& 2 OTRS.
PET.ADV. : PARTY-IN-PERSON RESP.ADV. : GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
SUBJECT: HOME DEPARTMENT (MISC.MATTERS) DISTRICT: HYDERABAD
FILING DATE: 16-07-2013 POSTING STAGE : INTERLOCUTORY(HOME)
REG. DATE : 18-07-2013 LISTING DATE : 11-02-2014 STATUS : ---------
HON'BLE JUDGE(S): NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

If the hon-ble judge is retired/posted out

Similar Resolved Queries :