Jurisdiction on perjury
gauvaskum
(Querist) 19 September 2015
This query is : Resolved
I have a maintenance case @125 CrPc which is disposed ex-partiate based on the affidavit and witness of my wife, where she says she has not withdrawn money from the ATM of her account where i deposited money and also claiming that she is not working. Lately i found out that she has been working in a school during the pendency of the case. The judgement was given by the District Family Court. I tried to file a perjury application against the two facts mentioned above in a JMFC court. The matter is not being accepted as the JMFC Judge wants clarity on the jurisdiction of the complaint. Any citation where the JMFC court has accepted such complaint subsequent to Order is required urgently. Request for your cooperation, this shall save me from grave injustice.
Thanks & Regards
PS: you may contact me at gautamkum@yahoo.com
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI
(Expert) 19 September 2015
Jurisdiction should be residence and place of work place of either party
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 20 September 2015
citations not provided.
gauvaskum
(Querist) 20 September 2015
Gentlemen thanks for running through the problem, but i need any such citation where the JMFC can consider my case of perjury where the Family court has closed the case. Thanks & Regards
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 20 September 2015
Don't get frustrated my friend citations are very much available on google.
gauvaskum
(Querist) 20 September 2015
:-), Its not frustration; rather tried to elaborate the issue. Tried it on google but not able to find yet, still trying on it. Mean while if any one who is aware of such a citation may please post it. Thanks
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 21 September 2015
Consult a local senior lawyer, however, number of citations are available on net.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 21 September 2015
Jurisdiction for Perjury
Dear Author,
You have to file a petition u/s 340 cr.p.c. in the same District Family Court wherein the false affidavit is filed by the wife. No other court is having jurisdiction.
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 21 September 2015
Rightly concluded by Adv Arunagiri
