LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Order 39 rule 3 a of cpc

(Querist) 12 January 2015 This query is : Resolved 
when A Court issue Ex-Parte Injunction , plaintiff Counsel failed to Comply Order 39 rule 3 a . When we bought it to the Notice of the Court with WS and Objection, Court still extend TI. When We protested with Memo for Extension of TI ,Judge notes in order sheet as Follows :" 3rd Defendant file Objection for Extending TI for not complying Order 39 Rule 3 a and 3rd defendant has no-objection to extend The TI" and TI was extended till further orders.
what is the remedy
venkatesh Rao (Expert) 12 January 2015
Appeal and appeal is the only remedy.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 12 January 2015
File appeal in such case.
Advocate Bhartesh goyal (Expert) 14 January 2015
Challenge the order by filing cma


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :