Possibility in govt job
Rishabh verma
(Querist) 02 August 2018
This query is : Resolved
I was convicted in gambling act and i fined near about 100 rs by court can i get govt job
K Rajasekharan
(Expert) 02 August 2018
Paying a fine does not prevent you from getting a government job.
Fine is not a punishment at all. Punishment for an offence is quite a different concept.
Guest
(Expert) 02 August 2018
If you have money you can get govt job. Everything depends on money only.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 02 August 2018
You were fined and NO case is pending.
Carefully go thru the forms/applications/affidavits etc that you are to sign….and do not conceal anything as per the information to be furnished by you.
Thereafter the matter is upto recruiter.
If you do not conceal you may get relief from courts.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 02 August 2018
To avoid committing any error you may approach in person seasoned employees/trade union leaders and a very able senior LOCAL counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in Labor/service matters and well versed with latest citations, LOCAL applicable rules/laws/ … and having successful track record…. and worth his/her salt…..and share inputs /show the documents/evidence for a considered opinion..
At each location three are some counsels that specialize in such matters and they are well known.
Check for such counsels at LOCAL Labor court/CGIT, CAT, School-Educational tribunal,civil courts, HC, SC……
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 02 August 2018
In the meantime you may go thru;
The Service Rules of the said govt establishment
And also
Madras High Court
P.Mohan vs The Director General Of Police on 16 April, 2013
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127441879/
Category SERVICE RELATING TO STATE GOVT.-17100
Appointment-17123
Cancellation, Illegal & Invalid Appointment / By incompetent authority / Advertisement
WRIT PETITION (WP) 9760/2014
SHUKHSAGAR SINGH
Vs
1 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
PRINCPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL , Bhopal , MADHYA PRADESH
2 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
POLICE HEAD QUATER BHOPAL , Bhopal , MADHYA PRADESH
3 INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
POLICE HEAD QUATER (SELECTION) BHOPAL , Bhopal , MADHYA PRADESH
4 SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
GWALIOR , Gwalior , MADHYA PRADESH
https://mphc.gov.in/upload/jabalpur/MPHCJB/2014/WP/9760/WP_9760_2014_FinalOrder_23-Jul-2014.pdf
MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH AT AURANGABAD ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.531/2012 DISTRICT – BEED
Abhijeet s
V E R S U S
1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Home Department, M.S., Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Beed, Dist. Beed.
https://mat.maharashtra.gov.in/Site/Upload/Pdf/YUK%20oa%20531.12%20rajdk%20appointment0.pdf
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 02 August 2018
Similar queries have been discussed in many threads that you can search thru SEARCH option in threads, articles..
e.g;
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/A-teen-patti-gambling-case-is-pending-against-me-can-i-join-gujarat-government-job--379161.asp
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 02 August 2018
Don't pay money in other words Bribe..
Anyone if comes to know of instances can act and you will waste money and get entangled in litigation.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 03 August 2018
No punishment (including imposing fine) can be awarded without conviction.
K Rajasekharan
(Expert) 03 August 2018
Sorry to note that I made the above comment under the mistaken impression that it was just a fine for a lapse and not as a punishment in a conviction in a criminal offence.
K Rajasekharan
(Expert) 03 August 2018
Sorry to note that I made the above comment under the mistaken impression that it was just a fine for a lapse and not as a punishment in a conviction in a criminal offence.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 03 August 2018
Mr Kumar Doab quoted following cases
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/127441879/
five categories of case were decided
(i) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced criminal
prosecution, though they were honourably acquitted.
(iii) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced
criminal prosecution, though they were juvenile at the time commission of
offence.
(iv) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced
criminal prosecution though action was dropped or charges were quashed by this
Court.
(v) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced criminal prosecution though the involvement of the petitioners was in a petty offence under Section 75 of Madras City Police Act.
direction is issued to the respondents to give appointment orders to the petitioners :
(ii) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced
criminal prosecution and also that they failed to disclose about their
involvement in the criminal case either in the application or during
verification.
direction is issued to the respondents to give appointment orders to the petitioners on condition that the appointment is subject to the result of the decision of the Larger Bench of the Apex Court
(iii) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced
criminal prosecution, though they were juvenile at the time commission of
offence.
(iv) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced
criminal prosecution though action was dropped or charges were quashed by this
Court.
(v) Selection was denied on the ground that the petitioners faced criminal
prosecution though the involvement of the petitioners was in a petty offence
under Section 75 of Madras City Police Act.
direction is issued to the respondents to give appointment orders to the petitioners :
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Possibility-in-govt-job-688296.asp
applicant concealed the fact in verification Roll
the court decided that petitioner having concealed vital facts of his being convicted is not entitled for any relief.
MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.531/2012
While answering the question no. 11(a), (b) & (c) applicant has answered in negative because he was never arrested or kept under detention or bound down or /convicted by any court as he was not aware of any crime registered against the applicant in 2007 at Police Station Peth, Beed under Prevention of Gambling Act. According to the applicant, he was falsely implicated in the said crime. Till May, 2010 applicant did not receive any summons in the said case. The Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Beed vide judgment and order dated 30-08-2010 was pleased to acquit the
Court directed
Matter is remanded back to the competent Matter is remanded back to the competent
authority i.e. the State of Maharashtra for reconsidering application of the applicant for
appointment to the post of Police Constable in view of the guidelines of the Hon’ble the Supreme Court case in the case of Avtar Singh (supra). authority i.e. the State of for reconsidering application of the applicant for appointment to the post of Police in view of the guidelines of the Hon’ble the Supreme Court case in the case of Avtar Singh
Not know what happened to the applicant thereafter
