Regularisation of Services.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 17 February 2011
This query is : Open
Sir,
I was working in the govt. autonomous body and in the year 2002 the high powered committee of the autonomous body in its meeting where the then Minister of the Ministry under which autonomous body was regulated, former president of india, former m.p. and renowned scholars being members were present and took a unanimous decision "it was decided that the persons who were appointed in the project since 10-20 years may face problem to get regular job outside and it is decided that their cases may be considered for regularisation without affecting the seniority of the regular staff of the institution. This decision came into black and white and circulated through minutes and Member Secretary also forwarded these minutes to the concerned officers for 'necessary action'. But this decision was not implemented and no order was issued except releasing of these minutes.
Sir,
My querry is whether - (i) we the former project employee raise our voice to regularise our services keeping in view the above decision of regularisation which was taken by majority by the high dignitories of our country. (ii) In Uma Devi Judgement it is clearly stated that if decision of regularisation has already taken by the State then the Uma Devi Judgment can not be implemented on the same cases. Sir, can we expect that the decision which was taken in the minutes of the meeting by using words 'may be considered for regularisation' can be considered as decision of regularisation.
