Witness property encrochment
Prasad
(Querist) 18 April 2013
This query is : Resolved
1. In 1982 father and two sons are parationed thier proprty by comparmise court degree
2. father and elder son sold thier property in 1983
3. Younger son sold some part of the land by making revenue site 1984-86
4. in the revenue site one of the site sold to his elder brother
one of the boundry wrongly mentioned in the register sale deed
instead of mine he mentioned yours
5. elder brother childerns are done paration on 2001
6. younger brother is the one of the (5th) witness attestor of the above paration
7. younger did go through the above paration but in that paration deed has his property encroched by taking advantage of boundries ( ref above point 4 )
8. one more mistake done by wintess attator - he has sold one more site to third party thier also boundry mistake (instead of his the mentioned his elder brother name)
now case in court, yonger brother seeking injection
can some one guide is this case stand in court and give me same type of case and judgment if you have
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 18 April 2013
The original partition deed is the key to proper resolution of dispute.
Take cue form this deed.
Show your possession all along in the property which actually belongs to you even if the same is wrongly described.
For citation , search yourself.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 19 April 2013
Older partition deed clubeed with the sale-deeds of the shares of your father and elder brother shall clear the every point. There is no merit in the case of the sons of your elder brother and they shall have to face defeat in this unncessary litigation.
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well Advised by Experts
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
SHAME ON THIS FELLOW TO ATTEND THIS ONE YEAR OLD QUERY.
HE IS TRYING ALL THESE GIMMICS TO HIDE HIS FALSE AND FRADULENT PROFILE.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
please visit the following link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/N-J-S-Rajkumar-alias-narasimha-254519.asp#.VIcRwmeHPFx
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details
Listed Under
Business Law
Civil Law
Criminal Law
Practicing Since
2001
Specialization
SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES
Court
Others
Address
54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023
Other Details
rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
