krishna rao (retired) 27 April 2019
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 28 April 2019
What is your problem, if it is not an examination hall question paper?
However, if there is some truth in your story consult a local prudent lawyer with relevant documents for better appreciation, guidance and proceeding.
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 28 April 2019
Search in google and you can find the best articles and case studies. In short, when females got rights in self-acquired property of their parents if they expired intestate, the 2005 act gives rights to female co-sharers also equal rights with that of male co-sharers if the property remains undivided, and if father and co-sharer are living by 2005 cut of date.
Shashi Dhara 28 April 2019
krishna rao (retired) 28 April 2019
Thank you sir for your reply in 2005 act towards married daughters claim in ancestors property, as you said daughters father died in 1980, which he was alive as on 2005 act, which was filed in case in 2013, now only their advocates agrees as per 2005 act they are eligible for ancestors property. now preliminary judgement is going to give after may 2019
thank you very much
krishna rao (retired) 28 April 2019
sir above as per act 2005 passsed in 9.9.2005 their father was not alive, but died in 1980, sorry for above , preliminary judgement is going to come as a married daughters claim , they are not eligible for ancestors property, because father died in 1980
thats was clarified our lawer thanks
krishna rao (retired) 28 April 2019
sir above as per act 2005 passsed in 9.9.2005 their father was not alive, but died in 1980, sorry for above , preliminary judgement is going to come as a married daughters claim , they are not eligible for ancestors property, because father died in 1980
thats was clarified our lawer thanks
krishna rao (retired) 28 April 2019
thank you for kind reply thanks
krishna rao (retired) 01 May 2019
THANKS
R KRISHNA RAO