LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

498a-who,when,why,what

1.Who introduced this 498a?

2.Why was it introduced when innumerable such laws exist?

3.When was it introduced?

4. What is the Constitutional Position on this 498a?

5. Why is the Parliament silent?

6.Why do judges consider it indispensible?



Learning

 10 Replies

zimmerzapper (student)     15 November 2011

Originally posted by :Debbie and Nina
" 1.Who introduced this 498a?

2.Why was it introduced when innumerable such laws exist?

3.When was it introduced?

4. What is the Constitutional Position on this 498a?

5. Why is the Parliament silent?

6.Why do judges consider it indispensible?
"

 

very good questions nina or debbie, if my knowledge serves me right, i think this was introduced by indira gandhi in the year 1983, it is believed by some to be unconstitutional, about parliament you know india and vote bank politics. we don't know everyone's lives, judges are the people who hear case after case every hour of the day, so they are more likely to know realities of life in india. in india people are always in a kind of sadistic high and they reflexively hurt and antagonise poeple.

pratik (self working)     15 November 2011

good question.

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Advocacy)     15 November 2011

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on 12.02.2007
Date of Decision: March 07, 2007
Crl.Appeal No.161 of 1999
07.03.2007
Surender Kumar and Another ..... Appellants
Through:Mr. J.B.Dhanda with Mr. Vineet Dhanda Advocates
versus
The State(NCT of Delhi) ..... Respondent
Through:Ms. Richa Kapoor with Ms. Sukriti Bhardwaj, Advocates
CORAM:
JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Yes
2.To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes.
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes.
: SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J
1. By this appeal the appellants have assailed the judgment dated
18.3.1999 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge whereby the appellants Surender
Kumar and Ashwani Kumar were convicted under Section 308 read with Section 34 of
Indian Penal Code and Surender Kumar was convicted under Section 498A IPC as
well and against the order on sentence dated 23.3.1999 whereby the appellant
Surender Kumar was sentenced to undergo RI for two years and fine of Rs.1000/-
under Section 498A IPC and the two appellants were sentenced to RI for five
years and fine of Rs.1000 under Section 308 read with Section 34 of IPC.
2. The case was registered against four persons on the statement of
complainant Mamta who, in her complaint dated 9.3.1992, stated that she was
living with her family at House No.86/14, Sector-I, Pushp Vihar, New Delhi. She
was married to appellant Surender Kumar on 2.2.1992. Her parents used to live at
Sarojini Nagar. A day before the incident, her husband had taken her to her
parents house and then brought her back to her matrimonial home at 4 pm. On the
night intervening 8th and 9th March, 1992, she was beaten up by her husband and
to suppress her cries from outsiders, a tape recorder was played. Daily she
used to be told that she had brought less dowry and she should bring more
dowry. On the morning of 9.3.1992, she telephoned her father and called him. Her
father and brother came to her matrimonial home to take her to her parents'
house. When they (she, her father and brother) had come downstairs for going to
parental house, her husband called her upstairs to open the lock of Almirah. On
her going upstairs, her husband and her Dewar Ashwani Kumar, bolted the door
from inside and thereafter both of them picked her up and threw her down from
balcony, due to which she received injuries on her body. She further stated

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Advocacy)     16 November 2011

 

Payment of a dowry, gift—often financial, has a long history in many parts of the world. In India, the payment of a dowry was prohibited in 1961 under Indian civil law and subsequently by Sections 304B and 498a of the Indian Penal Code were enacted to make it easier for the wife to seek redress from potential harassment by the husband's family. Dowry laws have come under criticism as they have been misused by women and their families.

In India, there are civil laws, criminal laws and special legislative acts against the tradition of Dowry. Someone accused of taking dowry is therefore subject to a multiplicity of legal processes.

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Advocacy)     16 November 2011

Section 498A was inserted into the Indian Penal Code in 1983 via an amendment. It reads: 498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty. Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation-For the purpose of this section, "cruelty" means- (a) Any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) Harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her meet such demand.[9] This section is non-bailable,non-compoundable (i.e. it cannot be privately resolved between the parties concerned) and cognizable. Prosecution for a non-compoundable offense can only be quashed by a High Court of India under its powers under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code of India. Usually, cases under 498A are quashed by mutual agreement when the husband and wife reconcile with each other, or agree to divorce by mutual consent. After registration of an FIR for a cognizable, non-bailable offense, the police in India can arrest any and all of the accused named in the complaint. Status of Second wife under Anti-Dowry Law- I [2008] DMC 279- Bombay High Court- Justice C.L. Pangarkar —Ranjana Gopalrao Thorat Vs. State of Maharashatra- Hindu Marriage Act,1955—Section 17—Bigamy—Second wife cannot assume a character as wife--- It is no marriage in eyes of law—[Pg.280 {Para6}]-- Indian Penal Code—Section 498A—cruelty—word “relative”—meaning of- “Person who is related to husband either by blood or marriage—Thus she does not fall within scope of Section 498A-- Indian Penal Code— Pg.280 {Para6}] "Every Suicide After Marriage cannot be presumed to be Suicide due to Dowry Demand"- 2011[1] JCC Page No.668- In The High Court of Delhi- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra- Dated: - 2 December 2010- Rani Vs. State of NCT of Delhi- Criminal Appeal No. 93 of 2004- Indian Penal Code, 1860- Section 304B/ 498A Read With Section 34- Conviction- allegation of demanding of Rs.50,000/- and scooter were vague in nature- Whether it was done by husband, mother-in-law or father-in-law- Answers to all these questions are absent—Ingredients of Section 304B IPC were totally absent- Unnatural Death can be called a dowry death only if after making a demand made by accused is not fulfilled by perpetuation of cruelty upon the victim- The list of dowry show that both parties belonged to poor strata of society- No evidence, whatsoever was collected by police about the real facts- Every suicide after marriage cannot be presumed to be a suicide due to dowry demand- The tendency of the court should not be that since a young bride has died after marriage, now somebody must be held culprit and the noose must be made to fit some neck. [edit]Domestic Violence Act (2005/2006) Main article: Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 The above being criminal remedies, a civil remedy was brought into the picture in 2005 (amended in 2006). This was called the "Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act". For the purpose of this act, Domestic Violence includes the demand for dowry: For the purposes of this Act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it - (a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well-being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, s*xual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse; or (b) harasses, harms, injures or endangers the aggrieved person with a view to coerce her or any other person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any dowry or other property or valuable security; or (c) has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b); or(d) otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person.[10] This Act empowered the lower courts to issue "protection orders" on the complaint of a woman against her male relatives. The protection orders could include restraining orders on the husband and others, monetary compensation, and residence orders. Though it is a Civil remedy, violation of protection orders result in Criminal penalties (including imprisonment). [edit]Criticism of Anti-Dowry Laws

Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Advocacy)     16 November 2011

you may have got your answer 

adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate)     16 November 2011

You gott the details from Rajkumarlaxan.  But regarding report is submitted before the Govt., that 498A is legal terriorism.


(Guest)

1.In view of laws like 498a can a Hindu Marriage be called divine or sacramental?

Meaning of Sacramental:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrament

 

2.  HMA is wrong in many places of Prohibited Degrees of Relationships. Male Invests 3/4th of his genes in sisters daughter [Fischer, Wilson, Lorenz,Eibeldffeld, Samuelson].

3, How can a divine marriage become so malignant or s devil's marriage.

I'm getting suspicious of the Constitutionality [Lack of spirit of scientific temper] of 498a as well HMA in its 1955 form

 

After feed back and stats collection will post an article somewher if banned here. Don't understand indiscriminate banning going on here.

Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     16 November 2011

Read any commentray on IPC you would get the answers.

 

 

Regards,
 
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com

Alok Tholiya (self employed)     17 November 2011

Even today in most marriages dowry is big consideration. Specially in my community. The genetic and cultural defect comes up in many and they remain dissatisfied post marriage and start dowery demands, taunting, harrassment etc etc. 

Thousands of brides have lost their lives just after marriage. Finally a not very strong act was enacted. So the atrocities continue on bride and bride side. 

 How to stop that : 

1. Girls must be made strong and taught martial arts as compulsory subjest. 

2. Man and their side must be taught repercussions of 498A and other laws much before marriage. 

3. Both side must be taught to use secret gadgets and detectives. 

4. Small fights, issues, and other distubing factors are not dealt immediately with unbias, strong hand and then incorrigible person/persons ( be it bride or groom) keep repeating same and one day it blasts in big way like volcano. So able interference must be rendered without any delay but in most cases both sides first ignore and fear to intervene and then it is too late and only thing they do is gun for each other. 

5. A declaration of assurance by both side  that no extra marital  relations exists and no force is used on them for this marriage ( for reasons of Samaj/ dowery/ status) , physical examination and cerification that they r both fit to enjoy marital ( physical ) relationships, declaration of  health issues if any so no other side feels cheated and then taunts, certificate of income by boy, his parents, and other claims made by boy side must be in writing. 

6. Marriage should be compulsoryly registerd before registrar. And all witness to marriage including pandit and mullas be punished in marriages are solumnised without due registration. 

7. All the friends and relatives who knowingly hide major issues like sever ailments, extra / illcit relations and such other major issues which can culminate in to disaster in the life of those innocent be it from boy or girl side must be severly punished. 

8. Sex eduaction and enrichment of marital relationship , spiritualism must be made compulsory in schools and colleges as on the success of that depends the happiness of all family members.

And lot many marriages can be saved if friends of boy or girls are honest and bold and see that thier friend marries the one he loves or does not marry the one because the parents are forcing. But unfortunately there r some spineless, courageless, misguiding friends who want to encash even from so called friendship and thrieve. If a friend is a friend and sees antthing wrong happening then first warn him and if they fail then they must distance from any wrong actions of boy / girl or their family and should not be a part of sinister design of thier friend / parents. But When Duryodhan / Ravan had full army  of friends and relatived with them and Draupadi chirharan and Sita haran was done befoer their eyes and yet sideed Ravan and Duryodhan. Though they all then died. Now it is pancham kal so there r worst then that happenings and most of us burn effigy of Ravan but on the other hand participate crually in victimising a innocent girl and their family. May be they have genes of Ravan, 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register