Originally posted by :Arup | ||
" | NOW ANNA IS PEOPLES VOICE ONLY - parliamentarian's must note on it. | " |
Parliamentarians may not note it because what can the people do? Do self destructive hunger strikes like slaves? Who cares about slaves anyways? Parliamentarians know very well how to game the system(Constitution, democracy, votes and the like), fool and divide the people. The money power, muscle power, divisive politics everything in their favor. Exactly the same things that were in favor of the British rulers. What do people have with them so that parliamentarians fear the people?
Liberty has never come from Government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it... The history of liberty is a history of limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it. - Woodrow T. wilson
People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.-Benjamin Franklin
Originally posted by :JSDN -advocate DEFENSE | ||
" |
I am advocate of defense and power of defense is power of negative which is perpetual . Light has to be sustained but darkness is eternal. That is why negative sucseeds even may not be right. From this background what Anna is doing NEGATIVE MOVEMENT. Let people do corruption we will catch them for that we have to keep a police person behind every public person. Impossible feat to achieve so the movement will go on and on and on. Why not opposite is demanded that we make our systems simple so that there are minumum chances of corruption. But than there will not be media headlines , no TV cameras and most of all no heros. |
" |
What you are saying has substance. But why those in power will change the system? The system benefits and protects them the most and keeps the people helpless and disarmed the most. The same system that was designed to systematically exploit the people and only give an illusion of justice was created to protect the corrupt practices by British. On 15 August 1947 there was only transfer of power and the entire same system has been kept intact to continue forever by the vested interests.
Originally posted by : Zeeshan | ||
" | How is this possible ? If you have any suggestion please also put them here so we can also understand. | " |
I sincerely hope that the following does not become a reality in this nation:
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. - John F. Kennedy
When injustice becomes law, then Rebellion becomes duty! -Thomas Jefferson
Originally posted by : Zeeshan | ||
" | Once I went to lalu with some work. He asked me," party fund ke liye kya de rahe hain ??? ." |
This is a very "civilized" demand which almost every political party makes under suitable atmosphere. If you want to know more PM me your email, I will tell you more.
Originally posted by :Ankit Kr Mishra | ||
" |
SIR, cAN WE REALLY MAKE A LOKPAL WITH ALL THE DEMANDS THAT aNNA HAZARE JI WANTS ... WOULD IT DO GOOD WITH OUR EXISTING CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK... i DONT REALLY THINK SO.. pLZ EXPRESS UR VEIWS |
" |
Since when the "existing constitutional framework" become an obstacle to the politicians for their interests? They have amended the Constituiton almost 100 times in 60 years. Almost like daily changing of diapers. Who are they fooling by making the "existing constitutional framework" as an excuse? Where does the Constitution say that corruption has to be safeguarded and games be played with the Constitution?
We, the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.— Abraham Lincoln
The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. – Thomas Jefferson