LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Audio recording as evidence

Hi

I understand that audio recording in original media can be used as evidence in matrimonial cases but I have few questions regarding the same:

1) Is voice/conversation recording using voice recorder (not telephone internal recording) is producable. What if my wife disagrees that its not her voice. Burden of proving that this is her voice lies on me or she has to prove that this is not her voice? Will court take help of forensic labs in matrimonial cases?

2) I have very strong evidence in form of voice recordings but there is a lot noice as it was recorded in crowded area but with patience/concentration one can hear it easily. Will judge make that efforts to hear that noisy recording?

3) What weightage voice recording carries in matrimonial cases?? I mean to say will one be acquitted only on the basis of that recording or it is a small card that husband can play ;-)  ???

4) If in such voice recording, one person is accusing other of her mistakes and other person is just listening (not agreeing and not even disagreeing) and talking about every other things except those accusitions then will be it be treated ( in the eyes of law) as her acceptance of mistakes or such recording is of no use.

5) Do one have to produce transcriptts of voice recording and judge reads what notes has been submitted or will he listen to long complete recording with so many idle (time cosuming) pauses in between?

Please reply.



Learning

 9 Replies


(Guest)

Ho Tajobsindia Sir, please reply.

Zubair (aaa)     06 December 2012

Dear Sirs,

Please reply. Its already there in other topics but the questions are precise.

 

To add one more question : On what circumstances  Video/Voice/Audio recordings are considered as "Secondary Evidence" in courts.

Tajobsindia, Rajiv_Lodha, Bharat Sir, Maks, Victim, Chandu sir and every body have any info or knowledge pls share.

 

Regards

Zubair

Goutam Prasad (Advocate)     06 December 2012

Audio recordings have evidentary value only in corrobration with some documentary evidence. Also, such evidence needs to be non doctored and the same can be assessed in Lab only.

https://www.aegisjurist.com

https://www.facebook.com/aegisjurist


(Guest)

Can someone relpy to my questions, the original thread opener?


(Guest)

Tajobsnidia sirr?

reply ker do plz

Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com)     06 December 2012

Dear Querist

according to section 65 B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872

 

65B. Admissibility of electronic records:

 

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any information contained in an electronic record which is printed on a paper, stored, recorded

or copied in optical or magnetic media produced by a computer (hereinafter referred to as the computer output) shall be deemed to be also a

document, if the conditions mentioned in this section are satisfied in relation to the information and computer in question and shall be admissible in

any proceedings, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence of any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of

which direct evidence would be admissible.

 

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-section (1) in respect of a computer output shall be the following, namely: -

 

(a) the computer output containing the information was produced by the computer during the period over which the computer was used

regularly to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period by the person having lawful

control over the use of the computer;

 

(b) during the said period, information of the kind contained in the electronic record or of the kind from which the information so contained is

derived was regularly fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities;

 

(c) throughout the material part of the said period, the computer was operating properly or, if not, then in respect of any period in which it

was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of the period, was not such as to affect the electronic record or the

accuracy of its contents; and

 

(d) the information contained in the electronic record reproduces or is derived from such information fed into the computer in the ordinary

course of the said activities.

 

(3) Where over any period, the function of storing or processing information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period

as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) was regularly performed by computers, whether –

(a) by a combination of computers operating over that period; or

(b) by different computers operating in succession over that period; or

(c) by different combinations of computers operating in succession over that period; or

(d) in any other manner involving the successive operation over that period, in whatever order, of one or more computers and one or more

combinations of computers,

all the computers used for that purpose during that period shall be treated for the purposes of this section as constituting a single computer; and

references in this section to a computer shall be construed accordingly.

 

(4) In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things,

that is to say, -

 

(a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

 

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing

that the electronic record was produced by a computer;

 

(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate,

and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the

management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of

this sub-section it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.

 

(5) For the purposes of this section, -

 

(a) information shall be taken to be supplied to a computer if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly

or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment;

 

(b) whether in the course of activities carried on by any official, information is supplied with a view to its being stored or processed for the

purposes of those activities by a computer operated otherwise than in the course of those activities, that information, if duly supplied to that

computer, shall be taken to be supplied to it in the course of those activities;

 

(c) a computer output shall be taken to have been produced by a computer whether it was produced by it directly or (with or without human

intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment.

Explanation: For the purposes of this section any reference to information being derived from other information shall be a reference to its being

derived therefrom by calculation, comparison or any other process.

Feel Free To Call


(Guest)

Thanks for this bookish and generic extract...my question (though may silly) but were little specific...


(Guest)

Tajobindia sir, please reply :-(


(Guest)

bharat, tajobsindia sir, please reply


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register