Case filed under wrong jurisdiction

You treated the institution of marriage as a joke, and pulled in the court and judge to be part of your joke. Please let your husband live peacefully with a woman who respects him and grant him a divorce. Withdraw your petition and arrange a mutual divorce. You are unfit for him, and vice versa.

appear with a right family court advocate and submit you were not aware of law but you got messed up by advocate views, might be he was ignorant on jurisdictions, the court might allow you to move afresh to appear wherein you can state being a woman you need the matter be heard at the place where you stay, that will be allowed due to women's law

If the marriage happened under Hindu Marriage Act, the wife has got a right from the place where she is temporarily residing at the time of filing the petition.  On that ground by giving affidavit, that at the time of filing the divorce petition, you were staying in the place, which comes within the jurisdiction of the court.  Do not worry about your husband or his advocate.  Such kind of jurisdictional errors quite often happen. But if husband raises jurisdictional question, the court will take a lot of time to decide that issue and it would take away your valuable time.  As the place is also far away from your residence, on the next date of hearing you request the judge that coming all the way to this court is becoming expensive and time consuming and request him to permit you to withdraw the case and file it in some other jurisdiction, where you are entitled to file.  Under Hindu marriage Act, a wife can file divorce petition in any of these following places: 1.  Where marriage happened or 2. where both parties resided together 3.  where husband is residing at the time of filing the petition or (MOST IMPORTANT) 4. where wife is living at the time of filing the petition.  So, do not worry and act accordingly.

How she can be an advocate? she has to pursuade the court so too the advocate, not fight.speak the fact as it is, in fact it is not where the marriage took place ois vital as this is a case of inter caste and inter relion marriage obviously some kind of run way type from home; when problems arises in love, then they go back to their parents no court deny this fact that is called reasoning, so law is dry some thoughts sans emotions, so law is amenable to emotions too, that way even in murders we see whether the person attacked the other person either under premedited situationor spontaneous fear base, that way crimes arre decided, when so why marriage is based on emotions base only more than big great logic you hand on sir. tks,

Classic example of how lawyers misuse law and cover up under the protection of women laws.

No mattter whatever tactics you use madam, ur husband appears smart to rip your false-case apart.

Go for mediation/MCD