PREETY (EMPLOYEE OF P.S.U. BANK) 27 March 2009
Kiran Kumar (Lawyer) 27 March 2009
there have been no. of recent judgments by the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding the quashing of the cases on the basis of compromise....S.C specifically says such type of quashings shall be confined to disputes akin to civil nature only.
no doubt in few of the criminal cases complaints/ fir have been quashed on the basis of compromise.
as far as ur matter is concerned the FIR and the Chargesheet has to be read first in order to form any opinion.
quashing on the basis of compromise has become a larger issue now pls provide me with the apt details so that i may advice u properly.
Kiran Kr. Madan,
Advocate
09814303538
harry.law@hotmail.com
Swami Sadashiva Brahmendra Sar (Nil) 27 March 2009
1. in this case only s. 420 is compoundable, that too by bermission of court.
2. employee should not believe on banks assurance to withdraw the case.
3. any agreement as assured by the bank will be void and can not be enforced against it by the accused /employee.
4. return of money itself will be an strong proof against accused i.e. it will amount to confession.
5. you have not given the place so as to sugest a lawyer.
- Dr. V.N. Tripathi, Advocate , Allahabad high court
email: dr.vntripathi@yahoo.com ;
mob 9839527421 ph: 0532-2545245
Ravi Arora (Advocate) 28 March 2009
No chance of compromise. In which state you are and what F.I.R says give full detail
Anish Thakur 7018812737 (advocate) 10 January 2012
BANK CANT NOT GO FOR COMPROMISE AS THE POLICY OF ANY BANK NEVER ENCOURAGES FINANCIAL FRAUD, AND COMPROMISE BY BANK IN ANY FINANCIAL FRAUD WILL AMOUNT TO ENCOURAGE IT ,IS ONLY A TRICK PLAYING BY BANK TO MAKE CONFESSION FROM THE ACCUSED.
ANISH THAKUR
ADVOCATE
SHIMLA HIGH COURT
09459321520