If an advocate posts a blog and criticizes a judgment passed by a High Court on the grounds that the judges did not follow the law settled by the Supreme Court in an earlier decision, then is it a contempt of court? If so, why?
Mansi Aggarwal 10 February 2021
If an advocate posts a blog and criticizes a judgment passed by a High Court on the grounds that the judges did not follow the law settled by the Supreme Court in an earlier decision, then is it a contempt of court? If so, why?
Nandini Warrier 10 February 2021
Good evening,
Contempt of Court refers to the situation where there is an act of disobedience of the Court's orders, words or judgements. The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 talks about what constitutes as contempt. It also talks about what punishment must be sanctioned on the person committing contempt of court. Article 129 of the Indian Constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to become the court of records, and allows the Supreme Court to punish any contempt of Court.
What exactly constitutes as Contempt of Court?
(a) words, written or spoken, signs and actions that “scandalise” or “tend to scandalise” or “lower” or “tends to lower” the authority of any court
(b) prejudices or interferes with any judicial proceeding and
(c) interferes with or obstructs the administration of justice.
What will not be contempt of court?
Any fair reporting of the Court proceedings will not be considered contempt. And any fair criticism about the points of the court's judicial order will not be considered contempt.
Therefore, if the advocate has put up any comments that are not scandalous to the court in any nature, and if it is only a fair criticism, then it will not be considered contempt of Court.
You can always read more about contempt of Court in the following link-
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/contempt-of-court-11897.asp
Hope this helped!
Regards,
Nandini.
Sankaranarayanan (Advocate) 30 April 2021
Nothing more need to be added. Learned friend posted her maximum for your query