32. Power of court to permit appearances in particular cases.- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter, any court, authority, or person may permit any person, not enrolled as an advocate under this Act, to appear before it or him in any particular case.
Section 32 of the advocate act, 1961 of the above extract (UNDER THIS ACT) MEANS ADVOCATE ACT, 1961 only & not for any other purposes.
13. Right to legal representation.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any law, no party to a suit or proceeding before a Family Court shall be entitled, as of right, to be represented by a legal practitioner: Provided that if the Family Court considers it necessary in the interest of justice, it may seek the assistance of a legal expert as amicus curiae.
Section 13 of the Family Court Act, 1984 say (as of right, to be represented by a legal practitioner) so it doesn't mean that a person who has not yet completed this 3 years LLB course can appear before the Honourable any court.
Also there is a Judgment Passed By the Bombay High Court og Nagpur Bench which says that a person who has not completed his 3 years LLB course & not registred under BCI as an advocate canno't plead before the Hounrable any court. I couldn't find the case law but it is there.
So it is my opinion not to appear.
But our india is a demorcatric country so everyone has the right to do as they wish.
God Bless U & Best Of Luck.