Hi,
I am working with a middle size software firm. At the time of joining I signed the offer letter that stipulated a notice period of 3 months. After one year, based on the good performance of my team, the company decided to revise our salaries heftly and asked us to sign a contract which stipulated a notice period of 6 months for next 1.5 years. The time given to accept it was 1 week or we were told to resign otherwise(it was all verbal- no written proof). Ultimately all of us signed the contract.
Now after serving 3 months of contract, I have resigned from the company (due to personal reasons) and I want to be relieved after 3 months and not serve the full 6 months notice period. But the company HR is denying me the buy out option. It is asking me to serve the full 6 months.
Here's the notice period clause of the contract:
" You will be required to give 3 months notice in addition to 3 months notice period in your existing terms of employment(total 6 months notice) in case during this 18 months period, you want to resign from company or make payment of six months gross compensation to the company in lieu of six months notice. However company can terminate your services after giving 1 months notice. "
Here's my questions:
1. How do I interprete this contract? As per the above contract can I serve the notice period partially (i.e. 3 months serve + 3 months payout) OR does this contract states either 6 months serve or 6 months pay.
2. 1. Is this a valid contract legally?(as it is on unequal terms 6 months for employee and 1 month for employer)
3. What to do next as the company HR is denying me the buyout option and asking to serve the full notice period?
Appreciate if someone can help me out through this situation