LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rishi (Consultant)     20 December 2012

Need your assitance 156/3

Hi Stanley,

Sorry to bother you again.

She filed a case under section 156/3 in her hometown under this case she mentioned my parents, sister and mine name. The court regsitered her case as a complaint. In reality we did not do anything with her.

She got a fake certifcate from a government hospital which is located in her home town. The day when she ran away from my homeon that day I was out of station and my sister was in the school as she is a government teacher.My sister lives in her neighbourhood.

We did not ask for the dowry and my brother-in-law (with whom she has the relationship) bear the entire expenditure of the marriage also my dad already infromed the SSP of my hometown as well as her hometown through telegram. we have the copy og that telegram,

we have recording where she is clearly admitting that she filed this case as it is her strong weapon.

Please let me know the precaution which am I suppose to take to proof myself as an innocent.

Many thanks
Rishi



Learning

 2 Replies

stanley (Freedom)     21 December 2012

She is laying down the grounds with the false mdecial certificate for filing a false DV case or a 498 A case . In DV case there is no arrest where as in a 498 A case arrest takes place where in you have to apply for anticapatory bail 

Normally when the police fail to file a FIr than they approach the court to register a complain u/s 156(3) after a hearing 

 

As you say you were out of town keep the tickets of your travel as well as the bills of the place you were staying in it would help you at a later stage 

Go through this 

 

 

Time limit for registering a medico-legal case

A medico-legal case should be registered as soon as a doctor suspects foul play or feels it necessary to inform the police, at any time after admission. There should not be any unnecessary delay in doing so. A case may be registered as an MLC even if it is brought several days after the incident.

Precautions to be taken

a. Consent

A valid consent to medical procedures is fundamental to the interaction between all doctors and patients. Accordingly, consent of the patient or the legal guardian is mandatory for examination. To be valid, the consent must be competent, freely given, informed, and specific to the procedure being performed. In medicolegal cases, an informed consent includes information that: a) the examination to be conducted would be a medicolegal one and would culminate in the preparation of a medico-legal injury report, b) all relevant investigations needed for the said purpose would be done, and c) (the most important) the findings of the report may go against the patient if they do not tally with the history given.

A person arrested as accused in a criminal offence may however, be medically examined without his consent on the request of a police officer or on the orders of the court, if there are sufficient grounds to believe that such examination will provide evidence of the commission of the offence. Moreover, a reasonable amount of force may be used to medically examine the person in such cases (Sec 53 CrPC). To invoke Sec 53 of CrPC,6 certain criteria need to be fulfilled, namely: a) the person should have been arrested on charge of committing an offence punishable under law, b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that an examination of his person will afford evidence as to the commission of the offence, and c) the requisition for medicolegal examination is from an officer of the rank of a sub-inspector of police or above.

Whenever examining a woman, it is preferable that a lady doctor should examine her, or, wherever this is not possible, a female disinterested attendant (nurse, etc) should be present during the examination.7 The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana has now ruled that only a lady doctor can examine a woman who is an alleged victim of s*xual offence.

In civil cases, however, no examination should be done without the consent of the person to be medically examined.

b. Confidentiality

A doctor is required to keep secret all information regarding the patient that he comes across during the course of his treatment. Medico-legal reports are no exception and are to be treated as strictly confidential. They should not be issued directly to the patient. They have to be handed over to the police official, after getting them duly received on the carbon copy of the same. Copies of the MLR can be handed over to the patient/ his relatives, as per the prevailing rules of the doctor’s hospital, and after the requisite fee has been paid by the patient.

c. Collection and preservation of samples

All relevant specimens should be collected and after proper labeling, are to be sealed under the doctor’s supervision. These should be handed over to the police official concerned, along with the medico-legal report and a proper requisition letter detailing the tests to be conducted on such samples. If the samples have been collected on the request of the police, the fact is to be mentioned in the report and no requisition is necessary.

Medico-legal Reports

Medico-legal reports (MLR) are to be prepared immediately after the examination is done. They should be prepared in duplicate, preferably with a ball-point-pen, in a clear and legible hand. Cutting/ overwriting, etc should be avoided as much as possible and all corrections should be properly initialed. Abbreviations of any sort should be avoided.

An MLR comprises of three parts, namely:

a) Pre-amble—includes the date, time and place of examination, name of the patient, his residential address, occupation; name of the person(s)/police official accompanying, DDR/FIR No., informed consent of the person being examined, two marks of identification, etc, wherever applicable.

b) Body (Findings/Observations)—includes a complete descripttttion of the injuries/any other findings present; any investigations/referrals, etc, asked for.

c) Post-amble (Opinion)—includes the

·         Nature of the injury—whether simple or grievous.

·         Weapon/Force used—whether blunt or sharp or fire-arms or burns, etc.

·         Duration of the injuries—based on the characteristics of the external injuries.

Here, it would be pertinent to add that when giving the duration of the injuries, the most common mistake that is committed is that undue/complete reliance is placed on the history given; while the doctor’s own observations regarding the features of the injuries are often not taken into consideration. This again, may prove disastrous, as far as the courts are concerned. As regards the accuracy of estimating the duration of the injuries, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Ramswaroop v State of UP8, said that “It is well known that a doctor can never be absolutely certain on the point of the time so far as duration of injuries is concerned”.

·         Any other information that may prove to be helpful to the police.

·         If for any reason, the opinion is to be kept ‘pending’, the same is to be documented properly in the appropriate column.

The Officer/CMO issuing the MLR register to any doctor should ensure that it is properly numbered and a certificate regarding the same (giving the number of forms contained there-in) should be given by him on the first page of the said register.

All investigation forms, X-rays, Case file, etc should bear the label “MLC” on the top, so that necessary precautions can be taken by all concerned.

Custody of the Records

The records should be kept under lock and key, in the custody of the doctor concerned or may be kept in a Central Record Room, in hospitals where such facility is available; as per the institution’s rules.

Most hospitals have a policy of maintaining all medico-legal records for variable periods. However, as per law, there is no specified time limit after which the MLRs can be destroyed. Hence, they have to be preserved. In view of the multitude of cases against the doctors under the Consumer Protection Act, it is advisable to preserve all the in-patient records for a period of at least 5 years and OPD records for 3 years.9

Admission and discharge

Whenever a medico-legal case is admitted or discharged, the same should be intimated to the nearest police station at the earliest. It is always better to inform the police through the casualty of the hospital where the medico-legal register is usually maintained and necessary entries can be made in it. While discharging or referring the patient, care should be taken to see that he receives the Discharge Card/Referral Letter, complete with the summary of admission, the treatment given in the hospital and the instructions to the patient to be followed after discharge. Failure to do so renders the doctor liable for “negligence” and “deficiency of service”. In N. K. Kohli v Bajaj Nursing Home,10 the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission said that “issuance of the discharge certificate is the mandatory duty of the treating doctor and the Nursing Home/ Hospital and the non-issuance of the same amounts to grave negligence and deficiency (in service) on the part of the doctor and the hospital”.

If the patient is not serious and can take care of himself, he may be discharged on his own request, after taking in writing from him that he has been explained the possible outcome of such a discharge and that he is going on his own against medical advice. Police have to be informed before the said patient leaves the hospital. Sometimes the patient, registered as a medico-legal case, may abscond from the hospital. Police have to be immediately informed, the moment such an instance comes to the notice of the doctor/ hospital staff.

1 Like

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     21 December 2012

you already recorded her eadmission that the case is filed as a weapon


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register