Ex parte order set aside application.

When vakalat has been filed by counsel and doe not appear in court it is bound to issue notice to party concerned before setting defendant exparte.  This is a settled law.  One more settled law is that by engaging counsel party is not relieved of his duties and obligations.  If he fails to have contact with counsel he commits default, negligence. 

Can you please provide some precedents in similar matters before HC and SC?

District Consumer Forum and State Commission can not set aside their orders and also have no jurisdiction to review their orders.

Recently S.C in civil Appeal no 936/2013 arising out of SLP{C}no 19556/2012 decided on 5 2 2013 titled as Lucknow  Development  Authority vs Shyam Kapoor held 

  Consumer Protection Act Ss 22&22A Ex-Parte orders&Review District Forums and State Commissions have no power to set aside ex parte orders and to review orders .Such orders are assailable only before  the National Commission.{2013{2 } civil court cases 209{ S .C} Also see  2011 {3} Apex court Judgments 236 {S.C}

 so cite  the above judgments and get dismissed the application.

Thanks Mr Bhartesh,

I have gone through this judgement and also the judgement refered as follows-

Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & Ors. v. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & Anr., (2011) 9 SCC 541, wherein this Court clearly concluded, that neither the District Forum nor the State Commission had power to review its “ex parte” orders. 

As per me, the judgement means that district and state forum does not have power to set aside ex parte order passed by itself.

So, there are two cases at state commission level:

1. To set aside ex parte order passed by state commission.

2. To set aside ex parte order of district commission.

For Case 1, the judgement will be useful, but not in second case, is what I gathered from the judgement.

Because the ACT, has expressly given powers to state commission to review decisions of district commission.

Please let me know if my interpretation is wrong.