Respected experts,
sorry for bringing up the same subject again. In the DV case against me and my family, maintenance is ordered. I could pay only two months' maintenance. Today we found a new judge. OP said arrears are pending. Judge said arrears will have to be paid as per order ( made by the old judge). Said I have brought one months' maintenance. So judge asked me to pay that and did not say anything further. OP lawyer has come armed with petitions ( green paper) and told the judge something about property attachment. OP lawyer also said she is giving evidence ( op has been evading evidence for quite some time). Judge asked these to be given on the next date. Our lawyer said it is because judge is new and may be he needs time to go thro the case sheets.
i don't own a single property under this sky. I had some bank balance which got wiped off during these litigation period. My mother owns a small building and my father owns a flat. The flat was purchased by my father's hard earned money about 30 years back and my mother purchased her property about 15 years ago.
I know that she doesn't have any rights over my parents properties. My mother is respondent 3 and my father is respondent 2 in the DV case.
So what was the OP talking about property attachment?
Has she got any right to attach these properties since my parents are also resopondents in DV case?
can it be that they are trying to scare us?
Or, isthe OP lawyer herself hoodwinking her clients to extract some more money?