An Important Issue

RAJ THIS VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE. THIS ISSUE SHOWS OUR INDIA IS VERY RICH COUNTRY.

WE SHOULD FILE PIL IN SUPREME COURT. CAN SUPREME COURT CUT DOWN ABVE EXPENCES AND DISTRIBUTE IN POOR FARMERS.WHO REALY NEED FOR HIS AGRICULTURE.

During British Raj also mayors of Madras and other cities were getting more than their couterparts at Newyork and other cities.

MPLAD funds' commissions too should be added. Mr. Satya Prakashji in one of his thread had nicely  observed that only Politicians and Govt. employees are true Indian or son of the soil, other's are step sons.

Had they performed their duties/reponsibilities, that amount would have justified? But with the situation prevailing it is utter waste.

Price Of Democracy.

I should not have any issues to support your engineering fees.(what does means ,he's willing to take my fees or not reply me as soon as possible i'm looking forward your reply)

I should not have any issues to support your engineering fees.(what does means ,he's willing to take my fees or not reply me as soon as possible i'm looking forward your reply)

Sir,

What you have given is known expense, what about the hidden expenses. Well our constitution mandates the qualification for an M.P.  Your word ( allegations ) stating that No qualification should be errased. No harm in a person who have no educational qualification in becoming an M.P., No harm in spending for him. The main point it that whether he is doing his duties as an M.P who has been chosen to represent the people of the consitutency he belongs. The major answer is No. If he does his duties, we are the richest and the super Power nation in the World ( unshakable ).

Mr.Raj Kumar Makkad Advocate,

What's the objective of posting this thread especially when every body knows that policy is always above law.  The point I am trying to make is we all make fool of overselves at the time of electing our representatives and what's the fun of moaning and groaning like this.  

THE BEST PLACE TO POST THIS THREAD MUST HAVE BEEN UNDER THE OTHER HEADING RATHER THAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Regards

Daksh

thanks again to mr makkad and mr adinath. please go ahead. let us inform also i am with you.

mujhe aap sab  sey puchna hai.....arakshan.....par  jab humara samvidhan humko jati aur dharm ke adhar par bhed bhaw ko mana karta hai to fir ye arakshan jati ke adhar par aur dharm ke adhar par kaise diya ja sakta hai...par agar samano ke saat samanta ka aadhaar maan bhi liya jai to kia jo hindu nhi hai aur garib hai aur parishtithiya same hai kia usko bhi arakshan ka adhikar hai ya nhi....aur jab sarkaar ka kartaviya hai ke wo janta ke paise ka durpiyog nhi kar sakti fir kaise wo paisa jo sabka hai us paise sey chalne wale vibhago mey kuch jatiyo ko variyata dey sakti hai kia ye galat nhi hai ke mayavati jaisi crore pati bhi agar noukari ke liye aavedan kare to aniyo ke mukabale usko variyata di jaigi sirf esliye ke wo sc hai...aur right to vote humara adhikar bhi prabhavit nhi hota jab humare yaha sey sabhi sc chunav lade to kia ye majbur nhi kia jata ke majburan sc ko hi chuno kisi aur ko nhi....aur fir jo pahle hi bhed bhaw ke adhaar par chuna jaiga kia vo bhed nhi karega...kia aapko nhi lagta ke arakshan ko khatam karke slab vice arakshan hona chahiye aur wo bhi aarthik aadhar pe aur sabko hona chahiye jiski jitni income usko ussi hisaab sey arakshan..aur kisi bhi paper aur form mey jati na likhne ki azadi aur pure desh mey flat arakshan kiuki puri dunia mey do hi jati hai....ek amir aur ek garib...what u think i waiting ur reply?????????

well ms shaivani, 'aarkshan' & 'unnecessary expenditure are  are diffrent matter. if you like you may start a new thread, better under constitution, any how aarkshan is also a burning point.