minakshi bindhani
27 September 2021
As per your query concerned!
Sec 2(2). C.P.C. defines decree as the final culmination of the rights of the parties in a suit. Order 23, Rule 3 C.P.C. formulates the procedure of providing a legal seal to the adjustments arrived at by the parties by passing a decree in consonance with the terms of such adjustment and such decree is defined as compromise decree. The consensus of the agreement arrived at by the parties is given judicial recognition and ratification.
Rule 3B: No agreement or compromise in a representative suit can be entered into without the leave of the court. Before granting such leave, the court shall comply with a notice to the interested party.
But in the case of Lok Adalat, no compromise or settlement could be arrived at between the parties, the record of the case shall be returned by it to the court, by which the reference has been received for disposal by the law.
In my view, a compromise decree is considerably practised in a property dispute matter to avoid future litigation expenses.
Hope it clarifies the issues
Regards
Minakshi Bindhani