Sometimes it happens that the issue remains behind and discussion go somewhere else. So, let us come to the point.
I put here a "centred" question, that;
When the question arises before the constitution or before the state that what is the caste a cotizen belongs to???
Isn't it that; if a citizen claims that he/she is left behind the society and needs caste reservation??? And if considered once under any "particular" scheduled caste or tribe or OBC no change in caste is considered since once it is established.
Are all the citizens, those are belongs to any scheduled caste or tribe or OBC, should necessarily be granted reservation??? OR only to them who claim for it???
Those who do not claim caste reservation is it necessary to establish their caste unnecessarily and forcibly??? And forcibly they will be always kept with in the caste???
I DON'T WANT CASTE RESERVATION. WILL ANYONE ASK MY CASTE FOR NO REASON??? OR IS THERE ANY CONCERN AS TO WHICH IS MY CASTE??? OR ANY SUCH QUESTION OCCURS THAT AFTER MARRYING TO SOMEONE WHETHER MY CASTE IS CHANGED???
I think NO.
It is up to an individual as to whether he/she feels that he/she left behind the society and needs caste reservation, only their caste is asked. It is the whole concern of the constitution or of the state.
CASTE DOESN'T MATTERS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO FEELS THEMESELVES IN MAIN STREAM.
THE APPROVED LIST OF SC/ST/OBC IS ONLY MADE FOR A SYSTEMATIC DISTRIBUTION TO NEEDY PEOPLE WHO FEELS THAT THEY ARE LEFT BEHIND SOCIETY DUE TO THEIR CASTE CLASSIFICATION.
WHO FEELS THAT THEY ARE NOW COME UP EQUALLY IN MAIN STREAM OF THE SOCIETY THEIR CASTE DISAPPEARS SINCE THE CASTE BECOMES NO CONCERNS.
IF ONE DO NOT LIKE TO COME UP IN MAIN STREAM OF THE SOCIETY THEY EVER REFERS THEIR CASTE AND SEEK CASTE RESERVATION AND EVER IDENTIFIED WITH A CASTE. NONE OTHER DO
IT FOR THEM BUT THEY THEMESELVES CHOOSE IT.