LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108)     06 February 2009

Lower judiciary is ROTTING: SC

Dear All,
The following appeared in  "Times of India", Mumbai Edition on February 06,2009, page no. 01.
May be useful for future references, to prove the corruption and moral-less incompetence in the lower courts.

The SC ought to have a vigilance department, district-wise to investigate randomly on su-moto basis over the corruption and out-of-the-way  disposal / manipulation of the cases in lower courts.

The SC reaction is only a LIP - SERVICE, which as usual will be forgotten, by the time you finish reading this.

Keep Smiling ... HemantAgarwal
09820174108


Lower judiciary is rotting: SC

New Delhi: The supreme court on Thursday sounded the grim warning that the criminal justice system had been subverted, with witnesses being manipulated and trials being hijacked with judges and lawyers remaining “handicapped witnesses’’.
   Making the chilling observation, which to many only confirmed the widely held perception of the erosion of the system, a bench comprising Justices B N Agrawal, G S Singhvi and Aftab Alam also said that the lower judiciary had decayed.
   “The courts of magistrate and munsif have ceased to be an option for the common man,’’ the bench said and compared the lower courts to ill-equipped and ill-staffed public health centres (PHCs) in rural areas. “Only those people go there who have no other option,’’ said the bench as an apparent indicator of the low measure of public faith in these courts, which are the first points of dispute settlement for the masses.
   The comment, perhaps the sharpest ever from the apex court on the health of the country’s judicial administration system, came in a case arising from the appeal filed by two senior advocates—R K Anand and I U Khan—against the Delhi high court’s order hauling them up for criminal contempt for influencing a key witness in a hit-and-run case.
   The high court’s action against the two advocates was based on a sting operation.


SC judges throw up their hands

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday woke up to the rot in the judiciary system and said that a large number of trials have been hijacked and manipulated by defence lawyers. It was senior advocate Harish Salve who provided the trigger for the candid comments from the bench.
   The advocate said that while it might be fine to fault the journalists involved in the sting operation for the methods they used to record the conversation between the two advocates and the witness, what was really important was that their action had driven home the fact that “the criminal justice system faced a serious challenge from such activity’’.
   Salve’s opening provided the perfect vent for the bench to pour out its anguish. “Over the years, the fact remains that a large number of trials have been hijacked by manipulation. The accused have succeeded in manipulating the witnesses. In the system in which we are involved, the judges and lawyers have remained handicapped witnesses,’’ the bench said.
   The bench’s expression of helplessness with regard to the apparent pervasiveness of the problem in the criminal justice system took on a more serious dimension as the judges expressed serious doubts about the competence of the lower judiciary and waning public faith in it.
   Coming to the BMW hit-and-run case and the involvement of two well-known lawyers—defence counsel Anand and public prosecutor Khan—and the manner in which they allegedly manipulated the witness, the bench said, “What happened in this case is the tip of the iceberg. This is a case of accident. We have seen cases involving smuggling of arms, RDX, narcotics where the accused get away. But we are helpless.’’
   Salve said not only in the judicial system, there was also a general tendency in all quarters to disregard the majesty of law and the judgments passed by the judiciary. “The SC has repeatedly told the lawyer community not to go on strike. But we do not seem to care. The SC has told the police not to handcuff accused, but they have scant regard for it. The single directive principle protecting bureaucrats has been struck down repeatedly, but it still holds good. SC has ordered police reforms, but few states have implemented it,’’ he said.
   “I belong to a fraternity which has a lot to answer to society,’’ the leading lawyer told the bench in response to its caustic comments on the obnoxious manipulations happening in trials.



Learning

 17 Replies

Prakash Yedhula (Lawyer)     06 February 2009

The few instances of doubtful integrity of judges of High Courts in the North, the West and the South, widely reported and commented upon in the media last year and the ongoing prosecution of a former Judge of the Delhi High Court underline the need for a constitutional mechanism to weed out from the Judiciary members suspected of moral turpitude. The Prevention of Corruption Acts, 1947 and 1988, have not succeeded in checking corruption. A.P. Bharucha as Chief Justice of India frankly admitted that there was corruption in the ranks of the judiciary to some extent, mostly at the lower levels. The constitutional provision for impeachment of judges of High courts and of the Supreme Court is impracticable. The disease of judicial corruption has, therefore to be tackled by other methods before it assumes the proportions of an epidemic.

1 Like

Ravi Arora (Advocate)     06 February 2009

Ultimately the Judicial Officers are also coming form our society. And every body wants his work done at any cost. No body cares how he is getting his goal but he wants his work, so I think its time to check the entire system other wise we will discus, discus and only…… But things will never change.

M. PIRAVI PERUMAL (Advocate & Consumer Rights)     06 February 2009

I completely agree with what Mr. Arora said. The people in the country are slowly started losing faith in the judicial system. The lower judiciary is rotten (SC can say so if a common man says the same about  HC/SC judges  the same thing we will treated as contempt of court. The recent act of SC registry approaching the Delhi HC when they where directed by the CIC to reveal about their assests shows the mentality of the whole judiciary.  Can anyone imagine that Delhi HC rejects an appeal when their superiors (Supreme Court) is the petitioner.  Nothing will change them but a day will come when they will be forced to change.


 


 

PALNITKAR V.V. (Lawyer)     06 February 2009

The situation is really getting worst. But is there anyone to improve the service conditions of the lower judiciary. Is anybody trying to solve the problems faced by the lower court judges and their family. Why to blame only the lower courts? The writ petition filed by the All India Judges Association for various reliefs could not be decided expeditiously by the SC. In Maharashtra, judges are transferred at remote places, their family problems are not considered, they do not get good staff, they do not get adequate protection, they do not get proper facilities etc etc. They do not get timely promotions. They have not been given ACPs recommended by Shetty Commission. The atmosphere in and around judiciary is getting worst and the judges are finding it difficult to work fearlessly. A  honest judge does not have enough money if he wants to admit his son to private medical or other professional college while a constable can secure it for his son. It is easy to say that the lower judiciary is rotten but do we have guarantee that the higher judiciary is not so rotten? Can we say confidently that appointments to the Higher Judiciary are totally on merit basis and extraneous things are not at all considered? Who will try to understand the problems of lower judiciary and when those problems would be solved.

J. P. Shah (RTI & CONSUMER ACTIVIST)     07 February 2009

WE ARE A NATION OF RELIGIOUS PEOPLE WITH HIGH CORRUPTION LEVEL. OUR RELIGION ENDS ON THE LAST STEP OF TEMPLE AND LAST WORD OF PRAYER. MERA BHARAT MAHAN NAHI, YE MERI JAVABDARI HAI. UNLESS COMMON MAN OF INDIA DOES NOT SEARCH HIS SOUL AND DECISIVELY ACT, NOTHING WILL CHANGE. 

K.C.Suresh (Advocate)     08 February 2009

Don't limit rotting to lower judiciary alone.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Things will change if we legalise corruption.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Slowly! What an understatement. Well Sir, we have already lost faith,

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Either legalise corruption or don't join judicial service. What is the problem. CBI is questioning high court judges in corruption case. Who will question CBI?

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Being CJI he was constrained to use the words "to some extent". We have no such constraints. It is full fledged.

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Yes the buck stops at 'common man' who is the whipping boy. Why not adopt Saudi system of justice and stone the perpetrators of crime to death? Publicly behead or hang them by the nearest lamp post and see the transformation. 

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 Sorry! Supreme Court is showing its helplessness at CBI's handling of cases of Lalu, Mayawati and now Mulayam Singh. 

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 I donot understand one thing. Perhaps legal fraternity can enlighten me. Who is manning judiciary? You will agree that they are human beings. If granted, why should they not be corrupt like any other functionary in the government right from the peon to Minister?

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     11 February 2009

 We are afraid to call a spade a spade.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading