Nitin (AM) 06 May 2015
N R Dash.. (Advocate) 06 May 2015
It is a prohibited relationship as both of them are sapindas. Mutually discuss among your families and try for an amicable settlement of the matter.
Nitin (AM) 07 May 2015
Thanks Mr. Dash for your response.
We we have tried our best to discuss with girl's family and they are also trying to explain the concequecies of the matter to the gril but she is still demanding for the marriage. Boy is putting allegation in defence to that girl and we are not sure where this case will be heading to.
Can court understand the point of view of boy as it was a mutual relationship not a rape. Girl has also not gone for the medical test as per the FIR report and has made false allegation that the boy is threaten and beaten her in the past when she was at her place without telling her parents.
If the court will not listen to the boy side of story then It seems unfortunately the boy will not have a way out other than accepting her for marriage. Please advice.
Thanks !
Adv k . mahesh (advocate) 07 May 2015
why are you thinking only from the point of boy why not girl side, already they know and also they continued the relation and finally you came and disagree for the relation and now all are in a situation to settle the issue from girl side
thus in your words both agreed for the relation and now going to court and saying that why only listen to girl why not boy
Nitin (AM) 07 May 2015
Dear Mahesh sir, I hope you have read the details about the case. The boy has allegation that the girl has compelled him emotionally and had visited his place more often for the intension of s*x so that the boy will not have any choice to say No for marriage. The boy was telling her since long that he will not be marrying her because they are first cousin. They both are matured and adult.
Girl has added false allegation also to compell him for marriage and boy is also putting allegation by mentioning the girl character less and having other releation as well. The most important thing is that girl has visited him not he visited her place for this relation.
What is your take on this case now? Thanks !
Adv k . mahesh (advocate) 07 May 2015
go to your first query
They both were in relation with each others for about 4 years but parents were not aware
They both are matured and adult.
In this relation, they made few mistake which leads pregnancy and they did abortion as well
i am not elobarating your own points but making you realise who is at fault if she came with a bad intention what happened to boy who is also a matured person cant he ignore her being her cousin and complain to their parents a single moment is enough to complain about her to their parents why he waited all this 4 years and finally you say that since 2 years he is refusing her to marry after all the relation is over even abortion
better to marry her or fight the case if any merits then he will win or court also will direct the same
Nitin (AM) 07 May 2015
I buy your points sir but what about the first cousin. Both of them are sapindas..do you think it is legal in India?
What will be result of the marriage if they are putting allegatioon on each others. how many days this marriage will stand even if they both get married ?
Nadeem Qureshi (Advocate/ nadeemqureshi1@gmail.com) 07 May 2015
Dear Querist
marriage between the first cousins are prohibited.
it will be better to settle the matter amicablly or fight the case on merit.
TGK REDDI (No designation) 17 May 2015
Shri Nitin's Advocate is to be appreciated. Courts don't listen to boys (means, of course, men).
Not only Courts but also people.
Compromise resorting to marriage is a remedy worse than the disease. It's anarchical. Such a remedy is allowed only if the girl likes the boy. Pardon me. Premarital and post-marital adultery is a commonplace. A girl invariably has s*x with so many boys and men before marriage. How can she ask a particular person to marry her? Marriage assumes a form of punishment. Why can't males say that many others too are responsible?
Females are not so innocent to be so easily deceived. Is it not the responsibility of females to refrain from s*x till marriage takes place? Why, then, is man only punished?
Nitin (AM) 17 September 2015
SuperHero (Manager) 17 September 2015
Karma is the Sanskrit word for action. It is equivalent to Newton's law of 'every action must have a reaction'. When we think, speak or act we initiate a force that will react accordingly. This returning force maybe modified, changed or suspended, but most people will not be able eradicate it
Nitin (AM) 17 September 2015
advocatepassy@gmail.com 971794 (Advocate) 18 September 2015
Nitin, they are both adults and have fun with each other because they were pretty sure that they cannot marry each other. Something what your brother had said or done to her, made her really angry. Now she is hell bound to punish him by seeing him behind bars. Please tell your brother to meet her and sincerely apologises to her. It is not that courts do not hear boy's side. They do but generally the law and the society conscious is tilted towards women, hence this perception. Your brother's lawyer should highlight that it was consensual act between two adults which itself is not prohibited. They had gone for oboe tigon, that too is not prohibited. It is hurt hurt ego, which could be massaged by sincerely apolozing to her in front of her and her close relatives.
SuperHero (Manager) 18 September 2015
Nitin (AM) 20 September 2015
Thanks Vinod ji for your inputs. That should be the way if ego is hurt of someone.