Now which is a married lady

ya i really appreciate ur efforts...and am thankful to you for the same!

i am sure someone in LCI has this judgement.bas use copy paste ya upload karne kee der hai

hmmmm / ?

HOW ARE YOU MR GIRISHANKAR?

Arup ji with due respect, please see the definition of shared household in the PDV act.

"for the purpose of shared household, the property should belong (ie, owenership of the property) to  the husband and not anybody else.

- otherwise a tenant's wife will file dv  suit against her husband and capture the property."

hADD HAI; jar jar rotein honge is act ko banane wale, jab wo aisa anarth nikaalte dekhtein honge.

AMITABH JI,

FOLLOWING IS THE COPY OF YR POSTING.

(s)     “shared household” means a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with the respondent and includes such a household whether owned or tenanted either jointly by the aggrieved person and the respondent, or owned or tenanted by either of them in respect of which either the aggrieved person or the respondent or both jointly or singly have any right, title, interest or equity and includes such a household which may belong to the joint family of which the respondent is a member, irrespective of whether the respondent or the aggrieved person has any right, title or interest in the shared household.

IF THE RESPONDENT HAS THE RIGHT OVER THE PROPERTY, THEN THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT MAY CONSIDER.

Dear Arup ji please do not miss the starting lines which are as under

"“shared household” means a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship either singly or along with the respondent"

It is factum of living which is more important. nature of rights of the respondent is secondary thing. By way of an oreder of magistrate the lady gets only a right of residence where the respondent  is living. By way of this provision the legislature has taken care of right of only residence with the respondent or in a place where the respondent resides. the act does not say about any other right in property.  if the husband is staying in a house owned by his parents and his also resided with him in the same house then the lady is entitled for a protection order by a magistrate.

yes, true,

but the matter finally stick on

" jointly or singly have any right, title, interest or equity "

With due respect Arup ji ye samajhne ke wakil banna padega aapko.

Fine &Thank You ARUP JI.......

I wonder in our country now a days Daugther-in-Laws are not concerened as female in law as per civil property disputes.... Its Why is the ???????????

Now a days due to the law favouring them b'cous of political reasons{Vote Bank} there are taking undue advantage of troubling there parents home {i:e Sister-in-Laws} as well as in-laws Home.

Are they not female like them ????