Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 02 June 2011
Democratic Indian (n/a) 02 June 2011
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 03 June 2011
thanks di.
RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA) 10 July 2011
Dear Citizens ,
Don't cry about constitutional and unconstitutional . I have already posted several posting in the forum in this regard send PM also to " democratic" and " Mr. Arup " through the name " vmrajkishore " .No body can be punished in india who has the whole contents of Contempt Petition No. 203 of 1996 disposed by Supreme Court Of India . Get the whole contents and DO ANY CRIME IN INDIA.
Thanks with regards
Raj Kishore Vaish
09807952137
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 26 November 2011
Thos entering this debate may read consitution to find out if the prdon power of President can be exrcised without advise of the Counsil of Minisers.? Most of the qeustions will be replied.
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 28 November 2011
COI ART 72. Power of President to grant pardons, etc., and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases.— (1) The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence—
(a) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a Court Martial;
(b) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;
(c) in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the power conferred by law on any officer of the Armed Forces of the Union to suspend, remit or commute a sentence passed by a Court Martial.
It is true that, the President will work with the consultation of prime minister, but this power is more administrative than the constitutional, once the pardon already rejected by the president with all appropriate procedures, thereafter no scope to raise these points again.
Moreover the petition addressed to PM, not the president, who has no power to grant pardon.
Above all, regarding the grant of pardon, as the basic power vested to the President, not PM, therefore the communication not possible for grant of pardon till it addressed to the President instead of PM.
Mr Sudhir, Mr DI rightly said that, the approach is more political rather than according to constitutional provisions, for the purpuose of eye wash of the people.
Perhaps now you realise that, we already read and understand the Constitutional provisions.