Pankaj kumar (Studying) 03 February 2021
Nandini Warrier 03 February 2021
Good evening,
Section 17 of the Registration Act states that any document that talks about inheriting rights, extinguishing rights, title, property or interest that is mlre than the value of Rs. 100 must be registered. Section 49 of the Registration Act states that if any document is not registered as per Section 17, if can be considered inadmissible in the court of law.
There is an exception regarding family agreement made by the supreme court, stating that if the family agreement is oral, then registration is not required, and supreme court favours family agreements, since such agreements are made to prevent family strife and long court procedures of distribution of property. Hence if family agreements are mads honestly, they will need no registration.{Kale v. Deputy Director of Consolidation (1976)}
Registration of family agreement is required only when such agreement is written. A memorandum is different from family agreement, since it was made after the agreements were made, just for the purposes of documentation, but getting it registered will help it become admissible in courts of law.
In the case of Subraya M.N. v. Vittala M.N.(2016) 8 SCC 705, the Supreme Court held as under:
“There is no provision of law requiring family settlements to be reduced to writing and registered, though when reduced to writing the question of registration may arise. Binding family arrangements dealing with immovable property worth more than rupees hundred can be made orally and when so made, no question of registration arises. If, however, it is reduced to the form of writing with the purpose that the terms should be evidenced by it, it required registration and without registration it is inadmissible; but the said family arrangement can be used as corroborative piece of evidence for showing or explaining the conduct of the parties.”
Therefore, any written document containing details of such transfer of rights, or any such information must be registered for it to be admissible in the court of law.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Nandini
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 03 February 2021
What is the present issue? As the transaction was noted by the revenue dept., and as possession is with concerned parties since 1995, the adverse possession can be claimed to defend the ownership. Contact a local advocate with the issue. Such written settlement may not be stating rights but it is definitely an evidence of possession, supported by revenue records.
P. Venu (Advocate) 03 February 2021
Is there any real-time issue?
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 04 February 2021
It will be better to consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for appreciation of facts/ documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding.