A and B are brothers . A name is entered in pahani for a few years till 91-92. He has no document to show how he got his name entered in the records. During cross examination , he mentioned that a decree was granted in favour of his brother using which he got his name entered. A filed a case on D stating that D encroached the land,manipulated the records.
Pahani entries show B from 92-93 to 97. B sold land to C. ROR and pahani records show B and C only . D purchased land from C.
In the sale deed of C , A signed as witness which he denies. D obtained forensic report that A signed the document.
1.At this stage , the evidence produced by D is adequate to prove his right on property or any more evidence is required.
Decree in favour of B is not tracable but A himself mentioned perhaps unintended but cameout during cross exam.!
2. How D can proceed against A , what compensation /damages can be claimed for falsely implicating.
