LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

B.K.GUPTA... (ADVISOR)     27 July 2012

Rohit shekhar v narain datt tiwari

Judgment of The Delhi High Court dated 23rd September 2011 attached



Learning

 3 Replies

B.K.GUPTA... (ADVISOR)     27 July 2012

The order dated 20.07.2012 in the matter is reproduced:

 

  

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
  
  
  
  
  
  CS(OS) 700/2008
  
  
  
  
  
  SHRI ROHIT SHEKHAR ..... Plaintiff
  
  Through: Mr. Amit Sibal with Mr. Vedanta
  
  Varma, Mr. Giriraj Subramanium,
  
  Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh,
  
  Mr. Vibhor Kush and Mr. Raghav
  
  Awasthi, Advocates
  
  
  
  
versus
  
  
  
  
  
  SHRI NARAYAN DUTT TIWARI and ANR. ..... Defendants
  
  Through: Mr. Bahar U. Barqi, Advocate
  
  for D-1.
  
  Mr. Gaurav Mitra and Mr. Mohit
  
  Chadha, Advocates for D-2.
  
  
  
  
  
  CORAM:
  
  HON?BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL
  
  
  
   O R D E R
  
   20.07.2012
  
  IA No.13025/2012 (under Section 151 CPC)
  
  This is an application filed by the defendant No.1 seeking a
  direction that the DNA report received by this Court on 2nd July, 2012 be
  kept sealed and confidential till the conclusion of the entire trial.
  Reference is made in the application to the order passed by the Hon?ble
  Supreme Court in Special
  
  CS(OS)700/2008 Page 1 of 4
  
  Leave Petition (Civil) No.17622 of 2012, which reads as follows:-
  
  ?1. Having heard the learned senior counsel for Petitioner and after
  perusal of the record, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned
  order. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
  
  2. However, we still feel that certain protection with regard to
  confidentiality of the whole matter has to be granted to the Petitioner.
  We have been informed that presently, the Petitioner is residing at Anant
  Van, FRI Campus, Dehradun, Uttarakhand and is not in a position to move
  freely on account of his old age.
  
  3. We, therefore, direct that the Civil Surgeon of Government Hospital
  at Dehradun along with a Pathologist, the District Judge of Dehradun and
  
  the Joint Registrar Original Side of the Delhi High Court, would visit the residence of the Petitioner on Tuesday, the 29th May, 2012 at 10.30
  A.M. and the Pathologist would take the blood sample of the Petitioner in
  confidentiality in their presence for DNA profile test and the said
  sample shall be sent in a proper seal immediately to Centre for DNA
  Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD), Bldg.7, Gruhakalpa, 5-4-399/B,
  Nampally, Hyderabad ? 500 001 for analysis, by a Special Messenger of
  Delhi High Court who shall not be below the rank of Assistant Registrar.
  After test of DNA profile, the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and
  Diagnostics (CDFD), Hyderabad will forward the Report of the Analyst as
  soon as possible by a Special Messenger in a sealed cover to the
  Registrar General of Delhi High Court who will place the said Report
  before the Court.
  
  4. We direct the Petitioner to remain himself present at his
  residence i.e. Anant Van, FRI Campus, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, on Tuesday,
  the 29th May, 2012, positively.
  
  5. Respondents, if they so desire, may remain present either in person
  or through their representatives and also a representative of Petitioner
  may remain present at the aforesaid date and time of taking blood sample
  of the Petitioner at his residence.
  
  6. The Secretary General of this Court is directed to forward a copy
  of this Order by Fax to the Registrar
  
  
  
  CS(OS)700/2008 Page 2 of 4
  
  
  
  General of Delhi High Court, Registrar General of Uttarakhand at
  Nainital, District Judge of Dehradun and the Head of the Centre for DNA
  Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD), Hyderabad, forthwith. The
  District Judge, Dehradun is directed to inform of this Order to the Civil
  Surgeon, Government Hospital, Dehradun immediately so as to take
  necessary steps for collecting the blood sample of the Petitioner.
  
  7. The impugned order of the High Court stands modified to the extent
  as stated above.
  
  8. We also make it clear that this Order would be without prejudice
  to any of the parties as the civil suit is still pending in the court
  below.?
  
  
  
  It is sought to be urged on the basis of the aforesaid order that
  the confidentiality of the DNA report received by this Court is to be
  maintained till the conclusion of the trial. This Court does not find
  any such observations made by the Hon?ble Supreme Court in the said
  order. All that is stated in the order is that the Civil Surgeon of the
  
  Government Hospital at Dehradun along with a Pathologist, the District Judge of Dehradun and the Joint Registrar of this Court would visit the
  residence of the petitioner on Tuesday, the 29th May, 2012 and the
  Pathologist would take the blood sample of the petitioner in
  confidentiality in their presence for DNA profile testing and said sample
  shall be sent in a proper seal immediately to the Centre for DNA
  Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)at Hyderabad for analysis by a
  Special Messenger of the Delhi High Court. It is further directed that
  after test of DNA profile, the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and
  Diagnostics (CDFD), Hyderabad will
  
  CS(OS)700/2008 Page 3 of 4
  
  forward the report of the Analyst as soon as possible by a Special
  Messenger in a sealed cover to the Registrar General of this Court, who
  will place the said report before the Court. The very fact that the
  report has been directed to be placed before this Court, in my opinion,
  means that the report is to be unsealed in the presence of the parties
  and its contents made known to the parties. This is ordinarily the
  practice and procedure adopted by all Courts when diagnostic and forensic
  reports are received by the Court.
  
  With the aforesaid observations, the present application is
  dismissed with the direction to the parties and/or their authorized
  representatives to remain present on 27th July, 2012 at 2.30 p.m. for
  opening of the sealed cover containing the report.
  
  A copy of this order be given dasti to the counsel for the
  defendant No.1, as prayed.
  
   REVA KHETRAPAL, J.
  
  JULY 20, 2012
  
  km
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  CS(OS)700/2008 Page 4 of 4
  
  I-3
  
  

 

B.K.GUPTA... (ADVISOR)     27 July 2012

On 27.07.2012 ,the case was ordered to be  listed on 10.09.2012

B.K.GUPTA... (ADVISOR)     28 July 2012

The next date has been changed to 14.08.2012


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register