FIRST APPEAL DT.17th SEPT,2020 under RTI Act.
Before: First Appellate Authority,..............................
Against: Public Information Officer,.............................
Appellant:.....................................................
Grounds for Appeal: As per Sec. 7 (1) of RTI Act PIO has to either provide the information or deny information stating such applicable exemption under Sec.8 or Sec.9 of RTI Act. PIO has invented a strange reason that RTI is not a grievance redressal mechanism to deny information.. Such reason for denial was never stated in the RTI Act. Further authorities have violated laid down law and norms and depriving a salary without stating such reason. This is against principles of natural justice and fundamental rights. There can never be an exemption as a Public authority itself violated such laid down norms and not stating such reasons. Though an Indian citizen need not state any reason for seeking information under RTI Act, to bring urgency, the importance of information and serious violation by a public authority that amounts to harassment, the applicant has to state such reasons for claiming compensation under the law. Several CIC decisions state that RTI Application can also be taken as a redressal of grievance and should be attended to. (Without knowing the exact reasons for non-payment of such eligible benefits, a meaningful redressal application can not be filed and hence the information is urgent and important to the applicant)
As PIO has not provided the information and not denied information stating such exemption in Sec.8 with justification this first appeal treating the information as deliberate and malafide, deemed denial.
PRAYER: Appellant prays for directions to SPIO for providing the information as expeditiously as possible free of cost
Appellant.