Dear Shiva,
First of all please do accept my heartiest appreciation for the prompt reply.
Further, i would like to elaborate the whole section to support my query :
Section 264 as a whole deals with the recording of individual's consent who would like to act as Director to company at two places (1) with Company, if appointed and (2) with ROC latest by 30 days from his appointment.
Section 264(1) enunciates the provisions with regard to his written signed consent with Company.
Section 264(2) enunciates the provisions with regard to filing of the consent with concerned ROC. (which is done, by filing form 32).
Section 264(3) expressively exempt the private company from this section, if it NOT the subsidiary of Public Company.
Now, here my query stand, if section 264(3) is expressively exempting from the provisions of section 264(1) and 264 (2) then why the Directors of Private company need to file their consent with ROC?