LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Stop it Before it Will Kill All....

Page no : 3

(Guest)

agar ye sab mera bah or pita bhi karte dowry ki liye woh bhi saza ke hakdaar..unke liye kanoon badlne ki jaruraat nahi hain..sahi ka sath dena jaruri hain...

or jab shadi hoti hain hain to dono ki rajamandi se hoti hain..jab todne ka naam aata hain to ek ho kaise hak use todne ka fassila karne ka...

sirf ek jawab jab aapka jagda apne maa baap ya bai behan se hota hain..baar baar kahte hain..ab baas...fir kuch din baad wapas unhi ke beach hote hain..kuki woh khoon ka rista hain isliye???

biwi ke sath ka rista aapn jaise logo ke liye option ho jata hain..aap akele faisle kar lete hain...mera to dam ghut raha chodo esse...kya usse pucha hain rista todne se pahle???

tab aap fasila akele kasie suna sakte ho..????

shadi rista hain dilo ka ek ke todne se tuta nahi..jo todega usse saza milegi..dono razamandi se todege to saza nahi mutual divorce hota hain..samjhe app log...ye jo karta hai woh ya to paise ke liye wife chodta hain...ya fir extra affair ke liye...ya ladke ke maa bap ko uski wife pasand nahi hoti..kyu unhe lagta unka beta to gaya ab unke haation se...na inta mila jitna unhe paisa chahiye tha.....

Reformist !!! (Other)     31 July 2013

lijiye roma ji aap ke liye data tyaar hai ki kitne aadmion ne suicide kia hai india mein apni biwion se dukhi hoke....

https://standupforacause.wordpress.com/2013/06/22/national-crime-records-bureau-suicide-stats-2012-part-1/

kripiya dhyaan se padhen aur yahan dhang ki bhashaa ka istemaal karen......

12 ghante mard bhi bacche sambhalenge -----done hai .........aap naukri karke ghar mein paise share karengi ????
aapke maan baap ki sewa karenge----- done hai........... aap karengi sewa in-laws ki ??
jaise aapka ladke ke ghar pe hak hai ......kya aap manti hain ki ladke ka bhi hak hona chahie fir aap parents ke ghar pe ???
kyunki yahan gender equality ki baat ho rahi hai............shaadi mein aap ne agar dahej diye toh yeh bhi utna hi apradh hai jitna ki lena..........aur agar unhon ne aapka wapis nahi kia, toh zaroor yeh galat hai........par agar aap ne jhutha case dala hai, toh we cant comment y they have kept ur so called "Istridhan"....

44 kanoon ladkion ke hakk mein hain.....ladke ko defence ke lie bhi kuch nhi de rakha sarkaar ne...............toh kya aap un 98% ladkon ke lie khadi hongi jinko biwian jhuthe cases mein courts mein pratadit kar rahi hain ??

India mein janwaron ki bhi ministry hai, yes animal husbandry ki bhi ministry hai ...........lekin mardon ke lie koi kanoon nahin hai........

acha ek baat batayie.........aapne padhai kari and job kia, pehle 6 mahine ki salary aap ne apne father ko de di shadi se pehle.........aur shaadi ke baad yahan ladke ke ghar aa gayi,,,,toh kya ab apne dad pe 498 dalengi ki unhon ne shaadi karke bhej diya aur koi dahej nahi dia mujhe toh meri salary jo ki isridhan hai wapis dilwaya jaye ???

ghar mein sab ke vichaar alag hote hain, lekin maan aur beta ladkar toh thaane police station nahi jaate, lekin khali ye biwian hi kyun jaati hain ???? unhi kya sach mein maar padti hai.........yeh sab janne ke lie dekhie yeh blog

https://standupforacause.wordpress.com/2013/06/22/national-crime-records-bureau-suicide-stats-2012-part-1/

1 Like

(Guest)

Stepmom names two-month-old in dowry FIR

Mumbai: In diapers, lying in her mother's lap and yet to sprout teeth, but Zoya is an accused in a dowry harassment case. The two-month-old baby was named along with seven adults by her stepmother in a complaint letter to the police. What is worse is that the police has included the child's name in the FIR.

Zoya - who should be playing in crib - had to spend several hours in a police station with her mother, foregoing food and sleep and came very close to being arrested.

Her mother, Reshma Shamsuddin Khan, pleaded with the police. "Sahab ye toh choti bacchi hai. Iska aapne kaise complaint le liye. Toh woh bole nai kuch problem nahin hai, hota hai saat-aath saal ke bachi ka bhi hamare paas case hai. Tab humney socha ke court jayenge. (I told them that she is a baby and how can you write her name in the FIR. The policemen said that it was no big deal and that they had other cases against young children too. That's when we decided to go to court.")

Not surprisingly, Zoya is the youngest bail applicant before the Mumbai Sessions Court. She was granted anticipatory bail on Sunday and is now safely in her mother's care.

The defense lawyer, Ashok Bhole said, "My client called me and told me everything. I saw that the child's name was also in the complaint, so I quickly filed a bail application in the sessions court."

Meanwhile, legal experts are stunned to say the least.

Advocate Usha Makasare says, "It is crazy. Unheard of. We will have to see under what circumstances the court has given this order."

In all this, one wonders what prompted the complainant to drag the child into the mess and worse still, was it right for the police to have even called the child to the police station? The officer who is to blame for this bizarre incident has now been suspended and the child's name removed from the FIR.

==========================

Two-month-old Zoya gets dragged into a dowry harassment case filed by her father's first wife. Legal experts, child rights activists react in shock at her having to get anticipatory bail to avoid arrest

www.mid-day.com/news/2009/jun/210609-Zoya-two-month-old-girl-anticipatory-bail-dowry-harrassment-case-youngest-accused-Mumbai-news.htm


In a case straight out of Ripley's Believe It Or Not, the Mumbai Sessions court last Wednesday (June 17, 2009) granted anticipatory bail for what must have been their youngest applicant ever a two-month-old baby: Zoya aka Mehak Shamshuddin Khan. Lucky for her, or Zoya could have ended up behind bars.

Mother Reshma Khan of two-month-old baby Zoya said the family was called for an inquiry to Nehru Nagar police station. She sat there with the baby in her arms for 10 hours without reprieve, from 1 pm till 10 pm. She even had to feed her baby in front of the police and visitors

Zoya, who has got bail on a surety amount of Rs 10,000, is a member of the Khan family from Kurla who have been accused by Shakila Khan (27) in a dowry harassment case and for a criminal breach of trust. The sessions judge S N Sardesai in his order granted bail for seven of the eight applicants who applied for the anticipatory bail.

Shakila lodged a complaint against Zoya's father and her divorced spouse Shamsuddin Khan at the Nehru Nagar police station and named the entire family in her letter, including Zoya, her biological mother (Shamsuddin's second wife), a neighbour and four relatives. Shakila accused them of harassing and demanding dowry of Rs one lakh and torturing her, the police said.

Khan's lawyers Anil Bhole and Lata Vhotkar said the police initially thought that the matter would be resolved between both parties amicably. "However, when Shakila submitted a complaint letter against Shamsuddin and his family in which his second wife Reshma's baby was also mentioned, he had to rush for anticipatory bail for all his family members," said Bhole.

The police registered the case on Wednesday evening against Khan and his family members, acting on Shakila's complaint letter submitted earlier.

"Shakila and Shamsuddin divorced two years ago and he has since remarried and had Zoya with his second wife," said Nasim Bano Khan, Shamsuddin's mother. The entire family, apart from Shamsuddin, was summoned to the Nehru Nagar police station on Friday for questioning. "We were at the police station from 1 pm to 10 pm. Who would have looked after my baby while we were being questioned by the policemen? Our baby is so small, so I have to still bring her along every time," said a distraught Reshma.

The case so far
Police have filed a case against Shamshuddin Khan (divorced husband of Shakila), his second wife, daughter, mother, brother, two sisters and one neighbour for dowry harassment (section 498), criminal breach of trust (section 406) and acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention (section 34). Shamsuddin's bail application was rejected and he was arrested by the Nehru Nagar police station on Saturday.


(Guest)

Now,what be called as above-----------------simply shame on this one sided law and the way of investigation.






Reformist !!! (Other)     31 July 2013

nahi nahi roma ke lie yeh ladki jisne FIR karvai thi (upar wali), woh bhi usi 2% aati hogi.......jis bichari ko pati ne pratadit kia hoga 2 months ke bache ke sath conspiracy karke............sec 120b bhi laga deti ki yeh 2 mahine ke bacche ne sazish rachi hai aur sab ke sath milkar dowry maangi hai......

And if u remember sufferer bhai, family had to take ANTICIPATORY Bail for this kid too ........salute 2 our system and the above abli naari.........then after this IO was suspended on the basis that how a kid was named in FIR ....


(Guest)

Yes,buddy ! It's crime to born in India.


Isse accha hota ki aadmi chua,billi,saanp,kaua kuch bhi hota  atleast government birds aur animal ke extinct hone ke dangerous ko samjhti hai aur barabar dhayan deti.


So,every victim just pray to god as "never make me born in India in next born anf if born also never make me a husband"

Reformist !!! (Other)     31 July 2013

yes i pray that we shud never get rebirth in India


(Guest)

Accepting the illegal demand from once wife and in laws will only generate another sufferer to the society........ Cost of freedom is neither sucide nor fulfilling the illegal demands of wife. If you are capable of paying such money then it's ok.

 

BUT WHAT ABOUT THOSE HARASSED HUSBANDS---

 

who are suffering from his own dead marriage and needs to take breath, then what these wicked wives thinks i.e husbnads are like scraps or a postmartem body that his eyes,kidneys,liver,heart,blood,tissues,hair,sperm and last but not least a dead certificate of his own husband to show the policy agencies to take all the insurane amount to give him freedom.......

shame on all these ladies who don't know the meaning of life!

They scrupliously drag the husband in false cases to make husband either suicide or succumb or sale his entire body with with all hard earned money. If not able then be ready to suffer whole life ! I ask is this life? is these women are really a synonym of Maa durga, Maa kali, maa saraswati,Maa lakshmi or I would say a freak women with conspired mind overloaded with fake makeup and eye killing figure to trap victims. I beg my pardon----If any harrased husband if going to succum on these legal terrorism then I sure no body in India is going to see a blessed wedding in coming decades.

A sufferer..


(Guest)

This is for all who says that in India there is no Biased Law......as Law maker's are right before considering more wrong persons and only one right person.


Dear Madam's,

How many law cases have your read before pointing on such controversial topic. Don't disguised by just few drops of eyes of wicked women infront of judges as these women are highly crooked by passing societies due to urbanization. In today's India where 98% of 498a cases are false and merely 2 % get accused for the said cause. In DVA 2005 in this particular year I will state the condition of delhi just 2-3 months back were 35 cases of DVA was filed and all were false.

 

Now come to the maintenance part ......do you believe that women also have their brain,with two hands , two legs and their own stomach and sense to atleast work for their dignity and don't become parasite on their husband. ....no,they think they have universal right given by these biased law so they can ask through right even tough they are capable to earn. I say if you go to a village where an uneducated women along with his husband work in the field as a labourer for his/her families livelihood,then why can't an educated women can earn atleast 140 per day even low than MGNREGA workers appointed for 40 days of employment who are below poverty level.

 

Iam ashamed that women are wantedly made weaker sections in the society only for the cause of rulling and not for supporting her.


Now come to adultery.....a man who sleeps with a married women then he had performed illegal act and for these he would be sued for 5 years of imprisonment but the same act also done by his counterpart women,but for her no punishment...what is this is this not a biased law? so just read the case laws with wide open eyes madam before suggesting me to read and understand. You women can easily go for a relationship and when it is saturated or you may say as geting bored then you can leave them and indulge in new relationship but for this there is no punishment's.And the same act if done by a man then he is liable for rape,breach of trust ,forgery,fraud and many more and he will enter into rigorous punishment but the same act done by women there is no punishment...So what you will call this?

even now also you will say as this is not biased Law? if you still say it is justice then I wonder what is Injustice then. So,it's your time to think and infact try to understand the situation of men In India.

 

Thank's & regard's.

1 Like

yousuf (Deputy manager)     12 October 2013

hello.. wat u exactly want


(Guest)

^^^ @ Yousuf Bahisaheb , What you want exactly after puting this fake comment???

Do you want me to reply on your Ghost type post or wanted me to ignore you.

ok......I will choose later one 4 you bcz for me you are not rationale.

stanley (Freedom)     12 October 2013

A good write up and analysis by @ Sufferer .


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register