LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Swastika admits her dowry harassment allegations were FALSE

Page no : 2

ROHAN (Adm)     05 October 2013

Why men suffer?

More often than not this question has perturbed my mind and ever since I got involved in men's rights activism, fighting for men's rights, creating awareness about men's issues and problems and interacted with abused and victimized men, my understanding of the answer to the above question has improved tremendously and today I am going to write about the same in this article.

Before we delve into the reasons as to why men suffer, it is pertinent to talk about "How Men Suffer?"

It is important to understand how men suffer because the current social understanding about suffering of men is largely undercover. In fact, even after 8 years since the establishment of the men's rights movement in India and after umpteen presences in the media, by and large, the society is still oblivious to the problems that are faced by men. Even, if sometimes people are aware that the man is suffering, they have nothing to offer to the man. And this is again a reflection of poor understanding of the male psyche and male emotions.

Some of the common forms of abuse of men are,

1.    Forced to earn manhood: Boys are taught to be ruthless and cruel to other men, view them as competitors but have a soft corner for women. Even our social constructs are so designed that a man must earn his manhood while a woman gets her womanhood by default because of her gender. That's the reason we see dialogues like "Respect me because I am a woman", "You are not a man if.......", "You are not a man unless you......", "Be a man", "Take it like a man" etc.

2.    Conditioned to be inferior: Boys are socially conditioned to believe that in general the male gender is inferior to women and that a man's life is incomplete without a woman. They are conditioned to believe that it is OK to demean their own gender; in fact they are made to feel proud about that.

3.    Made to suppress: Boys are encouraged to suppress their emotions/pains/sufferings and as they grow up, the language that takes shape in their minds is - "It is unmanly for me to complain".

4.    Economic abuse: This is the most common form of abuse that men are subjected to. It's been a social tradition to expect men to earn money through hard-work and then others should enjoy it. In fact, men who spend their own hard money for themselves are ridiculed and those who spend it for their family are hailed even though the family is abusive towards the man. Every new anti-male law that is proposed is based on the premise that it is the right of the woman on the man's money.

5.    Emotional abuse: Men face a lot of emotional abuse which often goes unnoticed because of the high expectations from the society and the emotional suppression that they face since childhood.

6.    Abuse in Marriages: Marriages are tumultuous for men. Every year close to double the number of men commit suicides due to abusive and married men top the list of suicides.

7.    Legal Abuse: The legal system is highly anti-male. There are more than 15 anti-male, inhuman and unconstitutional gender biased laws which openly flout principles of natural justice and many more are coming in pipeline. Also, the legal system is immune and insensitive to the abuse of a man who is victimized and has nothing more than lip service to offer to them.

8.    Social Abuse: Men face social bias. All a man needs to invoke hatred against him is to have a woman complain against him and it does not matter how much bizarre, absurd or illogical the allegations are; social hatred against men (misandry) will ensure that the life of the man is ruined. And such deep is the misandry that even if the man comes out clean; there is no will in the society to punish the liar woman so as to deter other women from repeating the same offense. In fact, abuse of men by society is like a social service.

9.    Workplace Bias: Men face bias at workplace as well. Mostly men find it very difficult to get promoted and need to struggle a lot for the same. Most companies hire more women under initiatives like "Diversity" and mostly even if men are as competent as women, they lose out on the job due to such initiatives.

10.  Cultural Bias: Abuse of men is not a new fashion; it's a chronic social disease. Men have always been forced to play violent roles by cultures and societies by participating in wars, taking risks, losing their life and limbs and donning the role of a protector. And this very role of protector goes against men which takes away the right from them to fight for their own selves.

This is just a tip of the iceberg about the various problems which men have been suffering from and are either unaddressed or unrecognized. However, let us now see as to why men suffer so much?

Men suffer because of the following reasons:

1.    They don't share their problems: Men feel it is unmanly for them to share their problems and fearing social backlash and ridicule, they suffer silently.

2.    They share their successes more often than their failures: Men are made to feel unmanly when they share their failures with dialogues such as "Dude, you could have handled this much". Due to this reason and the first one, the problems of the male world rarely surface. All that surfaces is their successes all over which makes the society feel as if it is OK to snatch from men. But, as it is said, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", same is with the problems and struggles faced by a man. Merely because men are silent, does not mean they are good to go. It's just that they are resilient enough to deal with the abuse heaped upon them.

3.    The Protector Role of men: Even if they are being attacked from all sides they won't forego their "protector" role. Even after getting abused by the very society, men find in themselves a fetish to protect culture, protect society, protect country and such high and lofty objectives do not allow them to take up cudgels against the injustice they themselves are being subjected to.

4.    Logic of Men: Men are extremely logical and analytical in their approach and thus often they fail to comprehend emotional turbulences and end up getting bruised emotionally. Men have great respect for systems, hierarchies, rules and laws. That is the reason, they somehow think that anti-male laws are fine and they would never be trapped if they don't do anything wrong and even if that happens, they would use logic to prove their innocence.

5.    Internal Misandry: This is the biggest reason why men suffer. Internally men hate each other and have a lot of disrespect for each other. They judge each other a lot and are too quick and active in jumping into action to punish a man against whom a woman complains. That is the reason, even after being victimized, most men do not challenge anti-male social attitudes and anti-male laws because internally they somehow feel, these laws are justified, it's just that, for them, the anti-male laws should not be "misused".

The solution to end the suffering of men is very simple. It just depends on certain choices that men need to make.

1.    Men must stop disrespecting and hating other men.

2.    Men must challenge all such social constructs which force them to earn manhood or suffer abuse because it is considered unmanly to raise voice against it.

3.    Men must not view other men as competitors in order to get s*x.

4.    Men must challenge all forms of anti-male attitudes, laws and media content.

5.    Men must understand the importance of "men's rights".

Men's suffering will end if they make the above choices and choice to make these choices also belies with them.

ROHAN (Adm)     05 October 2013

The Marriage laws amendment bill is further evidence of the growing misandry (male hatred) in the society and how the society treats men as disposable entities. Even in this modern age when we talk of Gender Equality, the stereotypical patriarchal notion that the financial responsibility of a family should lay on a husband still prevails in the society, and this pervert social mindset is the root cause of abuse of men, especially husbands in a marriage.

In such a situation, where men are already burdened with so much of load, another law which makes divorce extremely costly for them is thoroughly unwelcome.

Highlights of the law:

  1. This law recognizes “Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage” as a ground for divorce.
  2. While the law empowers the wife to oppose the divorce at any point of time if the husband has filed for divorce, it restrains the husband from doing so when the wife has filed for the same.
  3. This law also contains a clause by which courts will be empowered to snatch away half the property of husband and give it away to wife.
  4. This law only talks about women’s rights and has no considerations whatsoever for men.

Brief Background:

Due to demand from various quarters, this ground for divorce was introduced by the Govt. of India by way of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2010 which sought to amend the Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act. However, the bill contained clauses that facilitated financial extortion of men.

The bill read that courts would have power not to grant the divorce unless the wife was paid adequate amount of money under the cute name of “Financial Security of Woman”.

And the bill also mentioned about special powers being given only to wives to oppose the divorce if the wife was unhappy with the money she received from the husband.

Such clauses being outright anti-male and gender-biased in nature were vehemently opposed by various men’s rights activists and organizations, who even deposed in front of the Standing Committee on personnel, public grievances, law and justice. The panel, chaired by Shri Santaram Naik, was presented with the objections raised by men’s rights organizations who sought to make the bill gender-neutral and ensure that no man faced any kind of financial hardship because of gender-biased clauses in the bill.

Oppositions ignored:

However, the objections raised by men’s rights organizations have been conveniently ignored by the standing committee panel, that has gone ahead and recommended the very clauses to the Govt. of India for the bill to be tabled, to which the men’s rights organizations has raised objections against.

What will happen if?

  1. Husband purchases a property just 6 months after marriage out of his hard-earned savings earned before marriage and his marriage breaks and he loses half of the property. In that case the husband will be doomed.
  2. Men start fearing this law and stop buying real estate which adversely affects the economy of the country.
  3. Husband has dependent parents and owns a single property and if 50% of that goes to wife post-divorce, how will the husband take care of his old parents? Is the concept of family restricted to only husband-wife in the Indian context?
  4. What, if the family is a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) owning a single joint property? Will the wife get 50% of that? What about other sibling’s share in it?

Confidare's objections:

  1. Marriages are tumultuous for men. This fact reflects in the suicide statistics that are published year-over-year by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and it’s the married men who top the list of suicide. Suicide rate of husbands’ increases 4 times the rate of wives’ and 6 times the rate they are bornEvery 9 minutes a married man commits suicide. This fact clearly proves how bad marriages turn out for men and if divorces are also made costlier by way of such laws, this will lead to further increase in suicides by men. Is the Government of India trying to facilitate the suicides of men?
  2. There is one more law in the pipeline – Matrimonial Property (Rights of Women upon Marriage Act), 2012 – which talks about making wife the co-owner of husband’s properties right at the time of marriage; then, why this law? Why is the Government hell bent on making redundant anti-male laws and convert marriage into an extortion industry thriving on men?
  3. In a democratic law making process, objections raised by a particular group or individual cannot be ignored without any proper justification. The panel has failed to give any just and proper reason as to why the objections raised should not be considered.
  4. As per Dowry Prohibition Act, any demand of cash/kind in relation to marriage is “Dowry”. Is not this law legalizing dowry to be paid to wife from husband under the cute name of “Financial Security of Wife”?
  5. Right to Equality is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India and cannot be disrespected under any circumstances. Current bill thoroughly violates it, as far as men are concerned.
  6. Feminists are claiming that nearly 80% of women do not have a place to live post-divorce. This is completely false because no such study has ever been conducted. India does not have any standard data collected as to how many divorces are happening, of those how many own a house and how many do not, how many are nuclear, joint and HUF families. Without any such data in place, any claims made are just airy claims without any data. Formulating a law on airy data is dangerous.

Confidare's demands:

  1. Marriages and Divorces should not be made a property-transfer-bureau.
  2. If property division is to be done then wife’s share in her ancestral property must also be considered and then division must be done.
  3. Duration of marriage must be a crucial factor of consideration. The difference between a 2 month marriage and a 20 year marriage must be clearly understood.
  4. Property division must take into account contributions made by both the spouses and also the fact that the property was acquired from wealth earned post marriage and not from previous savings.
  5. Any and all outstanding financial liabilities on the property like loan for property, loan against property, mortgage etc. must also be equally divided and wife must be made to be equally paid for it. If she is not working then she should get her share from her ancestral property.
  6. Both the partners should have equal and unbridled right to oppose divorce and there should be no gender-bias in this.
  7. There should not be any power wrested with the courts to decide upon property transfer or stalling of proceedings as the Indian judiciary is highly incompetent and has not shown positive trends favoring men when it comes to disposing cases. The Indian judiciary is highly anti-male and does not consider twice before ordering a man to either “sell his kidney” or “beg, borrow or steal” just to pay maintenance to his estranged wife. What is the guarantee that the same judiciary will make judicious decisions when it comes to this law?
  8. Institute a National Commission for Men, that can systematically collect issues, concerns and problems of men, study them and recommend to the Govt. about measures to be taken to address those problems.

If the Govt. of India does not take these considerations seriously then we have only one message for the hardworking Indian men, who think putting self before others, is a social norm –

Your hard earned property does not belong to you.


(Guest)

@Tajobs India & @ Jamai of law...your reply on this particular thread had made me to laugh.

 

and Tajob'sindia is making influence without any sense of Mr. Prabhakar who has deleted his profile due to politic's and egoism on this forum.

 

I appreciate Mr. Prabhakar's reply who put the untold story of injustice which is going through out in India.

I know the straight trees are cut first but it doesn't mean that one should stop telling the truth and fight for injustice created by this biased law.


If a women who files these false cases only to terrorize her husband and family and extort the money should be put behind the bar's not less than three year's and susequently parallel with the punishment what ever the original penal code of such offences permit's.

After this all will dare to file these fake cases and many families and their marriages will be saved at least...and their will be no hue and cry from wives who say's that " I have filed complaint case on my husband,his parent's & relatives and yet I want to live with him"

 

This is very high time to reload these biased law's now , as gone are the day's when women were treated as slave or just like concubines during 17th & 18th centure or before Independence.

 

Let's Join hand's to atleast aware our nearer and dearer one's and who ever associates with us to warn them about these biased law's and to save themselves from these women's.

 

Regard's,

A sufferer...


(Guest)

@Tajobs India & @ Jamai of law...your reply on this particular thread had made me to laugh.

 

and Tajob'sindia is making influence without any sense of Mr. Prabhakar who has deleted his profile due to politic's and egoism on this forum.

 

I appreciate Mr. Prabhakar's reply who put the untold story of injustice which is going through out in India.

I know the straight trees are cut first but it doesn't mean that one should stop telling the truth and fight for injustice created by this biased law.


If a women who files these false cases only to terrorize her husband and family and extort the money should be put behind the bar's not less than three year's and susequently parallel with the punishment what ever the original penal code of such offences permit's.

After this all will dare to file these fake cases and many families and their marriages will be saved at least...and their will be no hue and cry from wives who say's that " I have filed complaint case on my husband,his parent's & relatives and yet I want to live with him"

 

This is very high time to reload these biased law's now , as gone are the day's when women were treated as slave or just like concubines during 17th & 18th centure or before Independence.

 

Let's Join hand's to atleast aware our nearer and dearer one's and who ever associates with us to warn them about these biased law's and to save themselves from these women's.

 

Regard's,

A sufferer...


(Guest)

Until unless there is a law where once proved that such 498a or PWDVA case is false, the boy should be able to press charges, and it should be made a criminal offence to file falsified cases and do time behind bars a good 7 years.


But sonia and her ladla are more interested in getting telangana votes, what a pity.


at least if modi assures such husbands that he will bring a change in this law of 498a a counter law to curb false cases, then only india can improve.

Gopal Arora (Engineer)     06 October 2013

@Helping Hand

All parties are same.  In May 2012, Arun Jaitley (BJP) opposed the marriage amendment bill, and wanted the bil to have provision to give 50% of share of property of husband in IRBM cases. 


(Guest)

What if husband sells his all movable & immovable properties before thse law?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register